Trailblazer
Veteran Member
He had the power, He just did not use it.Baha'u'llah should have the power to avert disaster in his own family
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
He had the power, He just did not use it.Baha'u'llah should have the power to avert disaster in his own family
If its not vague to you what is the specific nature of the "unforeseen calamity", where will it happen when will it happen and how will it happen and most important of all, how did you get all that from, "Know, verily, that an unforeseen calamity followeth you, and grievous retribution awaiteth you."?It is only vague to those that do not heed the warnings...
It requires an understanding of all that Baha'u'llah has offered Daniel. It is a complex puzzle that only can be seen as more and more pieces are put into place.If its not vague to you what is the specific nature of the "unforeseen calamity", where will it happen when will it happen and how will it happen and most important of all, how did you get all that from, "Know, verily, that an unforeseen calamity followeth you, and grievous retribution awaiteth you."?
Lol, then if he is not even prepared to save his own family from unforeseen calamity such as falling through a skylight to their death what makes you feel so guaranteed that he will spare a total stranger like you and me from unforeseen calamity regardless of whether we follow his law to the last letter like his own son did?He had the power, He just did not use it.
You are dodging the question in my view.It requires an understanding of all that Baha'u'llah has offered Daniel. It is a co.pkex puzzle that only can be seen as more and more pieces are put into place.
That is the purpose, God allows us to assemble the puzzle, or say Meh!
Regards Tony
The other thought is that Baha'u'llah did use it. He knew his sons demise and gave his son a choice. The choice was to live or a wish granted.He had the power, He just did not use it.
I have no desire to do that for you Daniel, that would have to be your choice or it will always result in Meh!You are dodging the question in my view.
You claimed its not vague which means in my view that you have assembled the puzzle to use your own words.
So go on then, show us the assembled puzzle and how you assembled it if you can.
The context and thus what I was responding to was this:Lol, then if he is not even prepared to save his own family from unforeseen calamity such as falling through a skylight to their death what makes you feel so guaranteed that he will spare a total stranger like you and me from unforeseen calamity regardless of whether we follow his law to the last letter like his own son did?
Baha'u'llah never said that He was going to save anyone from the unforeseen calamity and my belief in Him is not based upon whether I will be spared or not. Yes, I will probably go on believing in Him till the point of death, unless something happens that causes me to lose that belief.He could just claim he had the power to save you but chose not to and you'd go right on believing him to the point of death in my view.
Of course you have no desire to do that which you are unable to do in my view.I have no desire to do that for you Daniel, that would have to be your choice or it will always result in Meh!
Regards Tony
So then @TransmutingSoul post threatening destruction for failure to adhere to the law of Baha'u'llah becomes irrelevant as we are just as likely to face unforeseen calamity with or without adherence to Baha'i law in my view.The context and thus what I was responding to was this:
"Meh, In my opinion Baha'u'llah who couldn't keep his own family loyal to the Baha'i Universal House of Justice invented by his successors reckons he has the power to avert any destruction caused by the remaining humans rejecting the more ridiculous advice of the Baha'i Universal House of Justice or any of the other more ridiculous advice of Baha'u'llah and his Successors?
Baha'u'llah should have the power to avert disaster in his own family before he comes lecturing people far more competent than himself on how to avert disaster in my view."
I was not referring to His son falling through the skylight. I was referring to the members of His family who rejected Him. I believe He had the power to change their minds but instead He left them to themselves to make their own choices.
I don't feel guaranteed that he will spare a total stranger like you and me from unforeseen calamity regardless of whether we follow his law to the last letter like his own son did. When did I ever say that?
Baha'u'llah never said that He was going to save anyone from the unforeseen calamity and my belief in Him is not based upon whether I will be spared or not. Yes, I will probably go on believing in Him till the point of death, unless something happens that causes me to lose that belief.
That sure makes sense to me. Why would a person desire to do what they know they are are unable to do? That would be futile and only cause frustration.Of course you have no desire to do that which you are unable to do in my view.
True.So then @TransmutingSoul post threatening destruction for failure to adhere to the law of Baha'u'llah becomes irrelevant as we are just as likely to face unforeseen calamity with or without adherence to Baha'i law in my view.
So then @TransmutingSoul post threatening destruction for failure to adhere to the law of Baha'u'llah becomes irrelevant as we are just as likely to face unforeseen calamity with or without adherence to Baha'i law in my view.
True.
The truth sets one free. No earthly calamity can overcome the station of certitude. The world is but a show, an assemblage of reality.Lol, then if he is not even prepared to save his own family from unforeseen calamity such as falling through a skylight to their death what makes you feel so guaranteed that he will spare a total stranger like you and me from unforeseen calamity regardless of whether we follow his law to the last letter like his own son did?
Certitude is blind faith in my view as earthly calamity comes whether or not one follows the law of Baha'u'llah rendering threats of earthly calamity irrelevant, and threats of spiritual calamity in the afterlife are non-demonstrable (not to mention illogical as i see it).The truth sets one free. No earthly calamity can overcome the station of certitude. The world is but a show, an assemblage of reality.
Certitude can only be gained after a just, unbiased and honest search for the truth. It is based in sound logic and reason, with ample relative evidence having to be considered.Certitude is blind faith in my view as earthly calamity comes whether or not one follows the law of Baha'u'llah rendering threats of earthly calamity irrelevant, and threats of spiritual calamity in the afterlife are non-demonstrable (not to mention illogical as i see it).
To the contrary doubt can only be gained after a just, unbiased and honest search for the truth. It is based in sound logic and reason, with all reliable and relevant evidence having to be considered in my view.Certitude can only be gained after a just, unbiased and honest search for the truth. It is based in sound logic and reason, with ample relative evidence having to be considered.
Regards Tony
One has to determine these matters for their own selves and Baha'u'llah offered that "The understanding of His words and the comprehension of the utterances of the Birds of Heaven are in no wise dependent upon human learning. They depend solely upon purity of heart, chastity of soul, and freedom of spirit."To the contrary doubt can only be gained after a just, unbiased and honest search for the truth. It is based in sound logic and reason, with all reliable and relevant evidence having to be considered in my view.
To merely claim certitude can be gained through such a process without being able to demonstrate it is empty assertion in my view
So, if his son would have chosen to live, pilgrims would not have been allowed to go to Haifa? Why couldn't his father grant both?The other thought is that Baha'u'llah did use it. He knew his sons demise and gave his son a choice. The choice was to live or a wish granted.
Mirza Mihdi asked that Baha'u'llah allow pilgrims to return to Haifa and Akka as a sacrafice for his life. Thus the privilege we have this day for Pilgrimage, is a direct result of that choice.
bahai-encyclopedia-project.org
The Baha'i Encyclopedia Project › ...
Mihdí, Mírzá (1848–70) - The Baha'i Encyclopedia Project
Baha'u'llah and Ásíyih K͟hánum gave their son for the future of Baha'i pilgrims. Ya Baha'ul Abha.
Regards Tony
I see the bounty of that decision was written on tablets of crystallite, before the time it was manifested in this world.So, if his son would have chosen to live, pilgrims would not have been allowed to go to Haifa? Why couldn't his father grant both?