Call_of_the_Wild
Well-Known Member
I am against false biblical doctrine, and both you are Ingle are promoting just that. But that is ok, stay in the darkness.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Is being gay a sin according to your religion?
- Thread starter AlphaAlex115
- Start date
I am against false biblical doctrine, and both you are Ingle are promoting just that. But that is ok, stay in the darkness.
That's why I'm not interested in discussing this with you. You're not interested in truth. You're stuck in a dogma rut and are not interested in removing yourself from it. You're the one in intellectual darkness.
Triumphant_Loser
Libertarian Egalitarian
Only the way the religious do it.
OK the irony of this coming from the guy who "loves" Jesus is just too much.
Homosexuality filled beneficial roles in our (and many other animal's) evolutionary history and so it exists and has always existed in human society.
Pair bonded couples tend do better than single people in times of stress and they contribute their excess to the group. Further non bonded males in particular tend to be disruptive.
Such couples can also act as adoptive uncles when there is need and they can take more dangerous roles leaving the breeding couple to produce offspring.
For women, bi sexuality can be particularly advantageous by creating a network of lovers/"aunts" to help out.
Infidelity is simply a means of increasing the number of kids for the male or "improving" the father while retaining a supporter to raise the kids.
Or, god made them like that so respect his manifest will.
One of the things "Traditional" Christians don't understand is that many animals, who, according to most Christans, can not sin, exhibit homosexual behaviour, so isn't it simply a natural phenomenon?
Triumphant_Loser
Libertarian Egalitarian
Okay. Will do! :flirt:
Triumphant_Loser
Libertarian Egalitarian
Perhaps you'd be more comfortable closing the computer tab and watching Rev. Jimmy Swaggart's happy-go-lucky gospel sing along hour instead. I heard if you look really closely, you can see his 5-dollar prostitute under the pulpit.
Ingledsva
HEATHEN ALASKAN
Ingledsva said:
We don't have to justify anything. These are FACTS.
It changes to Molech worship at 18:21 and continues through at least 18:23, - with KNOWN Molech/Moloch Sacred Sex practices.
*
Ingledsva
HEATHEN ALASKAN
Again, we have done so several times, however ...
In Lev 20:13, it can be read differently. "Zakar" is also commemoration.
Here is the HRB version -
(HRB) And a man who lies with a male as one lies with a woman, both of them have done a detestable thing, surely they shall die; their blood shall be on them.
There is no - as one lies with a - before woman, and zakar can be commemorative, SO ...
Lev 20:13 And if a Man also lies down for commemorative sex (Sacred Sex) with a women, both have committed IDOLATRY, they shall die; their blood shall be upon them.
I also suggest you look at the top of the list for Lev 20, as the whole thing appears to be about Molech worship practices.
Lev 20:1 And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,
Lev 20:2 Again, thou shalt say to the children of Israel, Whosoever he be of the children of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel, that giveth any of his seed unto Molech; he shall surely be put to death: the people of the land shall stone him with stones.
Lev 20:3 And I will set my face against that man, and will cut him off from among his people; because he hath given of his seed unto Molech, to defile my sanctuary, and to profane my holy name.
Lev 20:4 And if the people of the land do any ways hide their eyes from the man, when he giveth of his seed unto Molech, and kill him not:
Lev 20:5 Then I will set my face against that man, and against his family, and will cut him off, and all that go a whoring after him, to commit whoredom with Molech, from among their people.
We know they did all of the things mentioned in Lev 20, in their Sacred Sex practice.
Sacred Sex in the Temples.
The Women were known, at least once, to dedicate their bodies, to the Temple as Sacred Sex Qadeshah.
They held yearly Sacred Sex celebrations - just as in Europe centuries later, where they went off with whomever they wanted to for sex. Hence the no father-daughter, no son-mom, etc.
*
Romans 1 is obviously Sacred Sex as it tells us so!
Rom 1:23 And changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and four-footed beasts, and serpents.
Rom 1:24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonor their own bodies between themselves:
~~ ~ NOTE: the people in 24 that dishonor their bodies, are the people WHO worship the Act of Creation in 25! Religious Sexuality! ~~~
Rom 1:25 Who changed the truth of Deity into a lie, and worship and render religious homage to the "Act of Creation" more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
Homosexuals are obviously NOT rendering RELIGIOUS HOMAGE to God with their Sex act.
This is Sacred Sex.
*
Last edited:
AlphaAlex115
Active Member
it does i read it in one night
Triumphant_Loser
Libertarian Egalitarian
Yep... Unfortunately. I don't really fit in with stereotypical " gay culture," and have gotten picked on for it a little as well. I don't wear anything rainbow, I don't speak with a lisp, I don't go to drag shows or pride parades, etc. But I don't feel like any of those are requirements for me to be bi. I'm quite happy sitting at home and watching crappy Sci-Fi movies, listening to Metal, and wearing cargo pants (which are apparently only for straight guys.)
sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
I am too. Which is why I support homosexuality as a normal expression of human love.
No, it doesn't. Why don't you actually read your own thread? It's been shown that those verses aren't anti-gay over and over again. If you refuse to see that, then you're either trolling or being willfully ignorant.
Triumphant_Loser
Libertarian Egalitarian
I can almost physically hear the passive-aggressiveness in your voice.
sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Or the willful ignorance.
Triumphant_Loser
Libertarian Egalitarian
And just a hint of prideful self-righteousness.
sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
BTW: Have I mentioned that I love your signature? Pizza is its own food group, and will be plentiful in the halls of Valhalla. When I was a kid I used to breathe pizza -- and still would if my gastric system would cooperate...
Triumphant_Loser
Libertarian Egalitarian
Thank you!
I'd like to think Valhalla has a Pizza hut, or a Papa John's, or even a Hungry Howie's. But only the shores of Náströnd have something as vile and unholy as a Domino's... Where you chew on stale crust for all eternity!