Taylor Seraphim
Angel of Reason
Eve was made as a mate for Adam...if Adam used the Eve's back passage for sex...the human race would not exist...
Because if he did so once that means he did so always.
Your being a moron.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Eve was made as a mate for Adam...if Adam used the Eve's back passage for sex...the human race would not exist...
You mean you judge the bible to be wrong.... the tail wants to wag the dog...So it's gays being oversensitive, and not you being judgemental?
As an atheist.....what would you know?
And if Adam had taken a vow of abstinence the human race would not exist either. So, what's your point?Eve was made as a mate for Adam...if Adam used the Eve's back passage for sex...the human race would not exist...
You mean you judge the bible to be wrong.... the tail wants to wag the dog...
What reality?That reality does not conform to fantasy.
What reality?
Adam would be a moron if he chose a yucky stinky toxic anus instead of a beautifully designed vagina to receive his manhood....and produce us as a bonus....Because if he did so once that means he did so always.
Your being a moron.
You mean you judge the bible to be wrong.... the tail wants to wag the dog...
Adam would be a moron if he chose a yucky stinky toxic anus instead of a beautifully designed vagina to receive his manhood....and produce us as a bonus....
Adam would be a moron if he chose a yucky stinky toxic anus instead of a beautifully designed vagina to receive his manhood....and produce us as a bonus....
I would say the new testament is, the old testament is more political.Your judgemental attitudes are what I find wrong. As for the Bible, I see it as a very crude and muddled attempt to convey a spiritual message.
But Adam did not take a vow....and here we are..deal with it....And if Adam had taken a vow of abstinence the human race would not exist either. So, what's your point?
I see you didn't actually answer my question. Here it is again, which emphasis in case you miss it: What was your point?But Adam did not take a vow....and here we are..deal with it....
No...the OP is clear....it is about our religion's judgement on homosexuality.... Shellfish has got nothing to do with it....this thread is like being Alice in Wonderland....It is one of the other of those laws that you state you follow. One cannot pick and choose which of the laws they wish to follow. Either you follow them all or none of them.
Genesis 19 .... Leviticus 18:22 ... Leviticus 20:13 ... Romans 1:26-27 .. 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 ... 1 Timothy 1:10I see you didn't actually answer my question. Here it is again, which emphasis in case you miss it: What was your point?
How so...And an extremely sensitive issue for you too..
I understand.....That is your opinion, particularly the part I bolded and underlined. I believe it to be more of an energy, but not having to do with Christ necessarily.
Jo...I do not think God is a one trick pony....How do you know it does? This is a double edged sword. But the truth is, the onus is on you to prove its divine. I have always said the Bible contains wisdom but so, too, does the Upanishads, the Vedas, and so on. Do you wish to state that there was no divine input into any other sacred text? Are you willing to say that the Qu'ran was not divinely inspired and if you are, on what basis do you make such as assertion?