Spirit of Light
Be who ever you want
Yes this is trueNo, the original sect was under Buddha himself.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yes this is trueNo, the original sect was under Buddha himself.
So Theravada Buddhism worldside are all managed locally through Buddhist temples, each temple electing a monk to manage the temple and be in charge of the teaching? The monks are dependent on the local Buddhist community for the premises and administration, right?Some clame it to be the closest to the teaching Buddha Sakyamuni was teaching, But honestly i do not know. But i think it was the first that was written down as suttas. But here i can be wrong.
But that was never written down, was it?No, the original sect was under Buddha himself.
I can only answer for those temple i know my self, but yes there is one "head" monk and the community do help with food and other needs. There are some people who are called Upāsaka (masculine) or Upāsikā (feminine) who dedicate their life to help the monks, this people are not monastic and not directly lay buddhistsSo Theravada Buddhism worldside are all managed locally through Buddhist temples, each temple electing a monk to manage the temple and be in charge of the teaching? The monks are dependent on the local Buddhist community for the premises and administration, right?
Buddha did only teach by oral traditionBut that was never written down, was it?
So Theravada Buddhism Suttas were written down by people 100 - 200 years after Buddha died?Buddha did only teach by oral tradition
It generated the oral traditions before they were written down. Buddha was keen on oral tradition. He wanted the Buddhadharma to spread and be accessible.But that was never written down, was it?
Written down by who?It generated the oral traditions before they were written down. Buddha was keen on oral tradition. He wanted the Buddhadharma to spread and be accessible.
As far as i know. Monks who already had reach enlightenment and because of this would be able to recall Buddhas exact wordsWritten down by who?
The Suttas and Vinaya were recited soon after Buddha's death at the First Buddhist Council. Some of the oral traditions may or may not have been written down before the Fourth Buddhist Council in Sri Lanka, when the Theravadan suttas were all written down.Written down by who?
This is the reason why the Four Dharma Seals were recognized: as a means by which to tell Buddhism from "sorta looks like Buddhism." It's a Mahayana thing, but Theravada also fits in with the Four Dharma Seals with their Three Marks of Existence and teachings on Nibbana.I think all this is very fuzzy: and we need to revise Buddhism on first principles based on proper scientific scrutiny of ones assertions.This is why Existential Buddhism is the way forward.
Hinduism was also a oral tradition before it was written down, right? so why do you feel buddhism i fuzzy and hindusim is not?I think all this is very fuzzy: and we need to revise Buddhism on first principles based on proper scientific scrutiny of ones assertions.This is why Existential Buddhism is the way forward.
You are emphasizing the nearly fully accidental fact that both Hinduism and Buddhism use the concept of Ahimsa (by such a name). I see that as misleading, and frankly, a bit naive as well.I am not pursuing ties to Buddhism that do not already exist.
So Mahayana Buddhism in First Century BCE first recognised the Four Dharma Seals that marks Buddhism as being something that is distinct from all other thoughts on dharma?This is the reason why the Four Dharma Seals were recognized: as a means by which to tell Buddhism from "sorta looks like Buddhism." It's a Mahayana thing, but Theravada also fits in with the Four Dharma Seals with their Three Marks of Existence and teachings on Nibbana.
I'll just post this link to the 42 negative confessions from the ancient Egyptian Papyrus of Ani for comparison to ahimsa.You are emphasizing the nearly fully accidental fact that both Hinduism and Buddhism use the concept of Ahimsa (by such a name). I see that as misleading, and frankly, a bit naive as well.
Hinduism is not a religion but the way of life of people in the region. It has countless religious traditions each orally passed down until they were written down. The same fuzziness applies on authenticity of the writings, example Who was Valmiki, Who was Sankaracharya, etc.Hinduism was also a oral tradition before it was written down, right? so why do you feel buddhism i fuzzy and hindusim is not?
I'm not sure when the Four Dharma Seals were recognized. You can see the Dharma Seals throughout Buddha's teachings, however. To ignore the Dharma Seals is to ignore Buddha's teachings. Hence, it is used to distinguish Buddhadharma from "sorta looks like Buddhism."So Mahayana Buddhism in First Century BCE first recognised the Four Dharma Seals that marks Buddhism as being something that is distinct from all other thoughts on dharma?
You are emphasizing the nearly fully accidental fact that both Hinduism and Buddhism use the concept of Ahimsa (by such a name). I see that as misleading, and frankly, a bit naive as well.
As I said before, I reject annata whilst accepting the other three seals. It should also be recognised that the justification of karma is an even more ancient Hindu belief stemming from reincarnation that Buddha accepted. Finally, the idea of Satchitananda from the Upanishads was incorporated in the concept of nibbana.I'm not sure when the Four Dharma Seals were recognized. You can see the Dharma Seals throughout Buddha's teachings, however. To ignore the Dharma Seals is to ignore Buddha's teachings. Hence, it is used to distinguish Buddhadharma from "sorta looks like Buddhism."