Is God pro-abortion?

[Subduction Zone]

I made an edit to my post. Here it is in case you missed it...

"Don't get me wrong. I'm not knocking you for your faith. That's great you have it. Sometimes a persons faith is what keeps them going, helps them make decision's, gets them through hard time and sometimes gets them just through the day."

I would not mind proper arguments against abortion, but true believers can't seem to raise any.

And when one investigates the topic most of their claims are simply bogus. Late term abortions, as previously defined, are a very small percentage of all abortions. They are usually medically necessary. Making excessive laws could backfire easily because those that truly need abortions for medical reasons might not be able to get them in time. The death rate of mothers and fetuses would likely rise under such a scenario.

 

[We Never Know]

Yes, people misusing terminology. Very convincing.

You do not seem to understand that as things stand you have lost the argument. Abortions are safe and legal right now. If you want to oppose them you need something more than a person that does not know how to properly refer to a fetus as a source. That is not going to get any laws changed at all.

Is this your opinion? If it is you've already stated your opinion doesn't matter in post #226.

 

[Subduction Zone]

The point was baby and fetus are used interchangeably and many people using fetus to justify killing a human being, that’s what’s disgusting.

Yes, people are sloppy in their terminology at times. But no matter how many times people are sloppy that does not make a fetus a baby.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Is this your opinion? If it is you've already stated your opinion doesn't matter in post #226.

Aah, misquoting. Nice.

 

[Subduction Zone]

The poster isn't that far off.

https://www-the--scientist-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/scientists-grapple-with-us-restrictions-on-fetal-tissue-research-67205/amp?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA==#aoh=16149186598023&referrer=https://www.google.com&amp_tf=From %1$s&ampshare=https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/scientists-grapple-with-us-restrictions-on-fetal-tissue-research-67205

That is true. What is now almost ancient fetal tissue is at the base of many vaccines. Now the question is are people pro-life or are they antiabortion. If they are pro-life they have to support that use of fetal tissue since it saved countless lives. If they are only antiabortion they will act as if it matters.

 

[McBell]

The poster isn't that far off.

https://www-the--scientist-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/scientists-grapple-with-us-restrictions-on-fetal-tissue-research-67205/amp?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA==#aoh=16149186598023&referrer=https://www.google.com&amp_tf=From %1$s&ampshare=https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/scientists-grapple-with-us-restrictions-on-fetal-tissue-research-67205

Yes he is.
The title of that piece is "Scientists grapple with US restrictions on fetal tissue research" not "Scientists defend using body parts from aborted babies in their experiments".

Do I really need to point out the differences between the information in both the links?

 

[We Never Know]

Yes he is.
The title of that piece is "Scientists grapple with US restrictions on fetal tissue research" not "Scientists defend using body parts from aborted babies in their experiments".

Do I really need to point out the differences between the information in both the links?

But science does defend their work with fetal tissue, etc. Without it many advancements wouldn't have been made.

 

[ElishaElijah]

Yes, people misusing terminology. Very convincing.

You do not seem to understand that as things stand you have lost the argument. Abortions are safe and legal right now. If you want to oppose them you need something more than a person that does not know how to properly refer to a fetus as a source. That is not going to get any laws changed at all.

Yes, people are sloppy in their terminology at times. But no matter how many times people are sloppy that does not make a fetus a baby.

Ok so when you’re interpreting Scripture and the exact word for miscarriage isn’t used are you able to say it is, ex. Numbers 5? Plus I agree fetus is the correct term, so is baby, especially a fully formed human being in the womb. Also, who are your Bible Scholars you trust? There names

 

[McBell]

But science does defend their work with fetal tissue, etc. Without it many advancements wouldn't have been made.

I never made any claim otherwise.

 

[ElishaElijah]

Yes he is.
The title of that piece is "Scientists grapple with US restrictions on fetal tissue research" not "Scientists defend using body parts from aborted babies in their experiments".

Do I really need to point out the differences between the information in both the links?

No because that wasn’t what I was saying or communicating. Wasn’t the point

 

[We Never Know]

That is true. What is now almost ancient fetal tissue is at the base of many vaccines. Now the question is are people pro-life or are they antiabortion. If they are pro-life they have to support that use of fetal tissue since it saved countless lives. If they are only antiabortion they will act as if it matters.

You say its true, Mestemia says he's far off. Who's post or opinion is right?

 

[McBell]

Also, who are your Bible Scholars you trust? There names

Already answered in post #216

 

[McBell]

You say its true, Mestemia says he's far off. Who's post or opinion is right?

Interestingly enough, MY post is about him trying to pass a blog entry title off as a headline.

Now I will flat out ask you to stop misrepresenting my post to further your agenda.

 

[ElishaElijah]

Already answered in post #216

Thank-you

 

[McBell]

Thank-you

I miss posts all the time and really appreciate it when the missed post is pointed out to me.

 

[We Never Know]

Interestingly enough, MY post is about him trying to pass a blog entry title off as a headline.

Now I will flat out ask you to stop misrepresenting my post to further your agenda.

I said he isn't far off, you said he is. He wasn't far off because science does defend their work with fetal tissue, etc. Without it many advancements wouldn't have been made.

Maybe you should be more clear about what you post and stop accusing.

 

[McBell]

I said he isn't far off, you said he is. Maybe you should be more clear about what you post and stop accusing.

I do not know how to make it any more clear than:

Except it is not a headline.
It is the title of a blog post
​

You know, the first two lines of that post......

I then presented a link to the only title with said name that google can find.
Perhaps you could be so kind as to give an example of how it could have been more clear that I was specifically talking about the "headline/blog entry title" and not the content of them?

 

[ElishaElijah]

Interestingly enough, MY post is about him trying to pass a blog entry title off as a headline.

Now I will flat out ask you to stop misrepresenting my post to further your agenda.

When I use headline it is this meaning :
: words set at the head of a passage or page to introduce or categorize
Some other meaning can be newspaper or breaking news.
As I mentioned it was an example how fetus and baby are used in our society interchangeably. Like body parts of an aborted baby like an arm or leg I would not call a fetus, to make it more palatable for people.

 

[ElishaElijah]

I miss posts all the time and really appreciate it when the missed post is pointed out to me.

Yep, never saw it, too much going on here

 

[We Never Know]

I do not know how to make it any more clear than:

Except it is not a headline.
It is the title of a blog post
​

You know, the first two lines of that post......

I then presented a link to the only title with said name that google can find.
Perhaps you could be so kind as to give an example of how it could have been more clear that I was specifically talking about the "headline/blog entry title" and not the content of them?

So he posted a title of blog. In reality it is real. Research it.