Is God pro-abortion?

[ElishaElijah]

Then why did you fail utterly as you have so often in the past?

And I need to remind you that you will not even allow yourself to understand how test your claims. You cannot know what is true or false when you use the Ostrich Defense.

What did you do look at the title and not read it?

 

[night912]

You can’t understand that the world isn’t gonna be destroyed by a flood? God says what He is gonna do so wouldn’t you rather hear His Word than someone’s opininion?

If God does exist then, yes, I rather hear his words than your opinion. So if you believe that it's better to hear his words, why are you giving me your opinion and the opinion of someone who lived and died hundreds of years ago? And that answers your first question. I can't understand that God isn't going to destroy the world with a flood if I never heard God's words saying that.

 

[Subduction Zone]

What did you do look at the title and not read it?

You did not read or understand the key part. You are trying to apply modern day beliefs to the point that that source made. In Old Testament times it was thought that the soul entered at birth. That is why when two men strove and a woman that was inadvertently struck ended up in only a monetary fine for losing the fetus. That was a monetary fine and not a death penalty if it had been the case that the fetus was considered to be a person.

 

[ElishaElijah]

If God does exist then, yes, I rather hear his words than your opinion. So if you believe that it's better to hear his words, why are you giving me your opinion and the opinion of someone who lived and died hundreds of years ago? And that answers your first question. I can't understand that God isn't going to destroy the world with a flood if I never heard God's words saying that.

He said that in the verse with the Rainbow as His Covenant to us, I sent that to you, right?

 

[ElishaElijah]

You did not read or understand the key part. You are trying to apply modern day beliefs to the point that that source made. In Old Testament times it was thought that the soul entered at birth. That is why when two men strove and a woman that was inadvertently struck ended up in only a monetary fine for losing the fetus. That was a monetary fine and not a death penalty if it had been the case that the fetus was considered to be a person.

Is the word ‘fetus’ in the Bible?
I’m not the only person who disagrees with you, here is one of many and they explain it very simply.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Is the word ‘fetus’ in the Bible?
I’m not the only person who disagrees with you, here is one of many and they explain it very simply.

Who cares if that particular word is in the Bible or not. Neither is the word "felching" so I guess that act is perfectly acceptable according to the Bible.

This error of yours is an example of a Red Herring.

 

[ElishaElijah]

Who cares if that particular word is in the Bible or not. Neither is the word "felching" so I guess that act is perfectly acceptable according to the Bible.

This error of yours is an example of a Red Herring.

Never heard of that term before, after looking it up you are a depraved, sick individual to even pick that word.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Never heard of that term before, after looking it up you are a depraved, sick individual to even pick that word.

.LOL, no I had to search for a while to pick a term that demonstrated how poor your argument was. I did not invent that word. But it illustrates a point extremely well. Claiming that a word is not in the Bible is an extremely poor argument.

Tell me, why didn't you own up to your error?

 

[ElishaElijah]

.LOL, no I had to search for a while to pick a term that demonstrated how poor your argument was. I did not invent that word. But it illustrates a point extremely well. Claiming that a word is not in the Bible is an extremely poor argument.

Tell me, why didn't you own up to your error?

It’s your error, baby has been God’s view since the beginning as I already demonstrated by Old Testament view ex Jacob and Esau in the womb.

 

[ElishaElijah]

.LOL, no I had to search for a while to pick a term that demonstrated how poor your argument was. I did not invent that word. But it illustrates a point extremely well. Claiming that a word is not in the Bible is an extremely poor argument.

Tell me, why didn't you own up to your error?

You searched a word and found that, sickening brother.

 

[Subduction Zone]

You searched a word and found that, sickening brother.

No, not really. . You sickened yourself. Now that is not healthy.

 

[Subduction Zone]

It’s your error, baby has been God’s view since the beginning as I already demonstrated by Old Testament view ex Jacob and Esau in the womb.

Yet as has been shown in this thread, and in the video that started it off, the Bible disagrees with you.

 

[ElishaElijah]

Yet as has been shown in this thread, and in the video that started it off, the Bible disagrees with you.

Lol, your false satire? Lol the angel must’ve flicked you on the lip.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Lol, your false satire? Lol the angel must’ve flicked you on the lip.

You have failed to show that any part of it is false. That must really hurt.

 

[ElishaElijah]

You have failed to show that any part of it is false. That must really hurt.

Nope

 

[ElishaElijah]

You have failed to show that any part of it is false. That must really hurt.

What you’ve said so far: They ate the apple and Bible doesn’t mention that, you posted a cartoon, you’re addicted to pornography, use apostates and unbelievers for your trusted sources, don’t know what the message of the Bible is, don’t know what God’s standards are or know God yet you put yourself in the seat of a judge against your Creator, you don’t even know that a baby in the mothers womb is an individual person. Keep on going with your deranged thinking though.

 

[night912]

He said that in the verse with the Rainbow as His Covenant to us, I sent that to you, right?

If God does exist then, yes, I rather hear his words than your opinion. So if you believe that it's better to hear his words, why are you giving me your opinion and the opinion of someone who lived and died hundreds of years ago? And that answers your first question. I can't understand that God isn't going to destroy the world with a flood if I never heard God's words saying that.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Nope

Yep. All that you failed when it came to properly applying the Bible. But then literalists cannot afford to understand the Bible.

 

[McBell]

What you’ve said so far: They ate the apple and Bible doesn’t mention that, you posted a cartoon, you’re addicted to pornography, use apostates and unbelievers for your trusted sources, don’t know what the message of the Bible is, don’t know what God’s standards are or know God yet you put yourself in the seat of a judge against your Creator, you don’t even know that a baby in the mothers womb is an individual person. Keep on going with your deranged thinking though.

 

[Subduction Zone]

What you’ve said so far: They ate the apple and Bible doesn’t mention that, you posted a cartoon, you’re addicted to pornography, use apostates and unbelievers for your trusted sources, don’t know what the message of the Bible is, don’t know what God’s standards are or know God yet you put yourself in the seat of a judge against your Creator, you don’t even know that a baby in the mothers womb is an individual person. Keep on going with your deranged thinking though.

Oh, it is so sad when a literalist cannot understand his own book of myths. When one says that Adam "ate the apple" that is in reference to the forbidden fruit of the Garden of Eden. It does not mean that it was an actual apple.

I never said or even implied that I am addicted to pornography. But it appears that you might be. You tend to project rather heavily. I pointed out that pornography is not bad in of itself. Only the sexually addicted seem to think otherwise.

You cannot fully understand the message of the Bible until you understand the flaws in the Bible and since you reuse to admit that those obvious flaws exist you can never fully understand it.

You have also failed to prove that a fetus is a baby. We know that it is a fetus. That is a proper term for it. When it comes to demonstrating that it is something more than that you fail utterly.

And lastly your version of God clearly does not exist, but you do not even want to go into that. You believe in an incompetent God that is vain and hateful. He is almost the opposite of Jesus. No wonder that you are so confused at times.

By the way, there are some legitimate arguments against abortion, but you have failed to post any.