Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
As we can see for many reason they are not , main one being westerners do not take religion so seriously any longer , as in practising it . Is few christian that know how to interpret bible for example .I see, so what has that got to do with Islam being compatible with the Western.
Yes and I think that's a good thing, religions should never be pushed onto the public, even in Christianity there are so many different beliefs, and who's beliefs are going to be the controller, your, mine ?As we can see for many reason they are not , main one being westerners do not take religion so seriously any longer , as in practising it . Is few christian that know how to interpret bible for example .
The controller game will continue civilization is as such, just won't be able to blame the christains any longer which yes is a good thing , another sacrifice of Jesus I think he would accept just to clear his name.Yes and I think that's a good thing, religions should never be pushed onto the public, even in Christianity there are so many different beliefs, and who's beliefs are going to be the controller, your, mine ?
Jesus was like Krishna belonged to no one and should not be forced onto anyone , like I said most Christians do not understand , is fadingYes and I think that's a good thing, religions should never be pushed onto the public, even in Christianity there are so many different beliefs, and who's beliefs are going to be the controller, your, mine ?
Yes I think many Christian could learn a thing or two from Krishna, Jesus seemed to be a serious man, whereas Krishna was always like a child, up to no good sometimes which I like, it makes him more human and not just divine figure.Jesus was like Krishna belonged to no one and should not be forced onto anyone , like I said most Christians do not understand , is fading
No one to teach them , apathy beyond points of reason, evolution , we live in world where we taught to use logic and reason, the NT a subjective account delivered some time later .Yes I think many Christian could learn a thing or two from Krishna, Jesus seemed to be a serious man, whereas Krishna was always like a child, up to no good sometimes which I like, it makes him more human and not just divine figure.
So you see that as serious practice? I beg to differ.As we can see for many reason they are not , main one being westerners do not take religion so seriously any longer , as in practising it . Is few christian that know how to interpret bible for example .
Lol come down of your horse, science does not have conclusive proof of non existence .
If you say so.My junior school teacher was very fair man , I was satisfied with his narrative and conclusions that could be drawn.
Thomas did not believe is doubt
No.Some might find Value in life eating babies
Law the prerequisite of civilized society
You are not helping.That was really important point for Muslim believers please do not make tangents .
The difference between the two being...?Islam, yes. Islamism, no.
Not helping your agenda ? ,however is the premise set by a Islamic prophet regarding disbelief .You are not helping.
It is difficult to have conversation with some so anti-christ I answered honestlySorry... that is, as our American friends, say, very much a non-starter. Russell's Teapot.
If you say so.
Not helping your case.Not helping your agenda ?
Ahah... yes, I suppose I am technically an antichrist. And our conversation is indeed difficult, since I have no desire to concede to your arbitrary and IMO unreasonable expectations.It is difficult to have conversation with some so anti-christ I answered honestly
I was baptized and confirmed in parish church of Thomas , Thomas is my patron saint per seAhah... yes, I suppose I am technically an antichrist. And our conversation is indeed difficult, since I have no desire to concede to your arbitrary and IMO unreasonable expectations.
Definitely, that God should be believed "just in case" because it is not "possible to prove that it does not exist" is safely in the scope of "not at all reasonable" far as I am concerned.
Thomas was outnumbered 10 : 1 that day they did not attack him for his belief , they had seen with thier own eyes per se.You are not helping.