anonymous9887
bible reader
4316
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Is it OK to question other people's beliefs?
- Thread starter anonymous9887
- Start date
anonymous9887
bible reader
By charges I mean attacks on Noahs ark and creation.
I am not attacking those. See Printed Commandment number nine.
Demonslayer
Well-Known Member
By "attacks" do you mean someone saying how the story is physically impossible?
4316 minus 2000 equals 2316 minus another 2000 because I think real history goes back that far equals 316 years for mankind to think about their travel to the U.S.A. The MATH has to be wrong! Oh. no U.S.A? Hm that would be a surprise development for sure. That is why I never fear for my life.
You are wonderful.
I realize my math is wrong. But the real math really does not allow for the migration of peoples and the establishment of nations on the other side of the world from Noah' side. There was not enough time. Maybe satan gets to fool with time.
Know why what? In U.S.A. schools we do not learn much. That's me!
I suppose it does not matter much as the end is always tomorrow.
I suppose it does not matter much as the end is always tomorrow.
That's why we don't use carbon dating for things past its natural half-life. This is what creationists consistently fail to mention and how I know creationists are only circulating among their own echo chamber and not looking at actual science. What they're doing is essentially saying all tools are wrong because this alan wrench doesn't fit this bolt, even though there is other wrenches which do.
Radiocarbon 14 is used for archaeologists, not paleontologists, which use mother isotopes which stay stable at a much longer half-life, such as Potassium, Uranium and Thorium radiometric dating, some of which have stable half-lives of BILLIONS of years.
Demonslayer
Well-Known Member
Mom? Is that you?
anonymous9887
bible reader
Haha. Yes.
You believe something that you haven't thought about yet. Are you not saying it something WE should not do?
anonymous9887
bible reader
Again I am not against the world being millions of years. I just say humans have been around for 6000 years.
Aupmanyav
Be your own guru
It is not that but we do not have expertise on dating methods. There are people who have. You too, have not researched all things on your own. You too, depend on the opinion of others who have researched the subject.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geochronology
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeology#Methods
You don't say much there. Every one will agree to that. Science says humans have been around for more than 150,000 years.
Last edited:
anonymous9887
bible reader
That's why it's called a discussion. That how we learn. I did not claim to know everything. But I have a position as you do.
It is because you choose to take the Bible literally. Did early humans even know about literal ideas?
I knew not about having a position, but I shall take that as a compliment.
anonymous9887
bible reader
I agree, but we have to look at both positions in all fairness, because we have scientist that believe in the bible.
anonymous9887
bible reader
Position in understanding.
I believe in the Bible. Most people who debate it believe in it, I suppose. There is a difference between believing in it and believing it is a perfect map. It is not a perfect map.