Yes, I know what you meant. Your position stays the same. Mine goes with truth. I do not know where truth is going. Do you?Position in understanding.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yes, I know what you meant. Your position stays the same. Mine goes with truth. I do not know where truth is going. Do you?Position in understanding.
So gods word is not a perfect map?I believe in the Bible. Most people who debate it believe in it, I suppose. There is a difference between believing in it and believing it is a perfect map. It is not a perfect map.
Humans have been around longer than that. We've dated human remains in excess of 195,000 years. And no, that wasn't with radiocarbon dating, but radioargon dating.Again I am not against the world being millions of years. I just say humans have been around for 6000 years.
Of course not! God's Word is a person. Good god man. Is he tattooed all over?So gods word is not a perfect map?
You claim yours to be the truth, but even your position on the faithful slave is very flawed. Your interpretation of matthew 24:45Yes, I know what you meant. Your position stays the same. Mine goes with truth. I do not know where truth is going. Do you?
The faithful and discreet are men who are not faithful and discreet? Even if that was true I can not believe it.You claim yours to be the truth, but even your position on the faithful slave is very flawed. Your interpretation of matthew 24:45
Thank you. That's the kind of evidence I'm asking for, these other guys could not state the facts. Do you have an article or study that confirms what you are claiming?Humans have been around longer than that. We've dated human remains in excess of 195,000 years. And no, that wasn't with radiocarbon dating, but radioargon dating.
It doesn't matter. If your interpretation is flawed on a very simple passage how can we trust your interpretation. Where the bible is explicit is conductThe faithful and discreet are men who are not faithful and discreet? Even if that was true I can not believe it.
I did not say mine is truth. I said I go with the truth.
Who said? For the most part, God is not portrayed that way in the bible. You can thank nonsense like the Greeks' "ideal forms" for this "logic". Ancient Canaanite religions didn't have these concepts.2. God is infinite. We have to face the fact that by the end of that chain someone had to be infinite. You speak of the spiritual realm, obviously they have things that we cannot comprehend and an infinite being is not out of the question.
I don't know, but he and Eve are written with the cognitive abilities of a seven year old.Adam was how old when he was created?
Speaking of dating mistakes, do you know why you can't just add up everyone's lives in the bible to get at how old the Earth is?What we have to face is that humans have been around for 6000 years. Also the dating methods have made plenty of mistakes.
Neither were the biblical authors. Heck, even God teases Job for thinking he knows anything about Creation...Dating methods are just speculation, because they were not there.
The 2 minute version of carbon datingIf you have faith in the dating method prove it bring evidence. You Expect Me To Take Your Word For it. Yeah right.
It's not even complicated math. How far a group of people can walk in a day and how many days it would take to reach Point B after leaving Point A. According to the Wiki for Oregon Trail, people covered roughly 10-15 miles per day for what is a 2170 mile trip.I don't think it's out of the question. It would be up to you to explain why not and for me to explain why it was. I haven't put much thought into it, but I believe it is possible.
Haha. Yes.
I don't think so. But I think it is true that if my conduct is flawed regarding anyone or anything which is true and right then I can't trust about myself that anything else is right. Luke 16:10 Does God's word say that we will know truths and they will set us free or does it say we will know the TRUTH and IT will set us free?It doesn't matter. If your interpretation is flawed on a very simple passage how can we trust your interpretation.
I agree!Where the bible is explicit is conduct
Psalm 90:2Who said? For the most part, God is not portrayed that way in the bible. You can thank nonsense like the Greeks' "ideal forms" for this "logic". Ancient Canaanite religions didn't have these concepts.
I don't know, but he and Eve are written with the cognitive abilities of a seven year old.
Speaking of dating mistakes, do you know why you can't just add up everyone's lives in the bible to get at how old the Earth is?
Neither were the biblical authors. Heck, even God teases Job for thinking he knows anything about Creation...
The 2 minute version of carbon dating
It's not even complicated math. How far a group of people can walk in a day and how many days it would take to reach Point B after leaving Point A. According to the Wiki for Oregon Trail, people covered roughly 10-15 miles per day for what is a 2170 mile trip.
Let's say you want to walk from NY, NY to Seattle, WA. That's 2857 miles per mapquest. Assuming you just walked and never did anything else (like eat or sleep), and the weather was nice, and you didn't die of dysentery (how I ususally ended up in the Oregon Trail game, LOL), it would take over 190 days just to get there.
My ancestors (some of them, anyway) had to walk the Trail of Tears, a much shorter distance. Do you know how many people died on that Trail? Do you know how many died on any of the long exploratory routes? No adequate medical care. No hotels. No nothing. You want me to believe that 8 human beings and God knows how many animals survived such long distances without being driven completely to extinction? It's not mathematically possible.
Psalms 90:2 You are confused. Genesis 11:7Psalm 90:2
OK. Since that time it is only 3700 years. Correct? My mind is feeling like cotton candy right now.
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/showing-their-age-62874/Thank you. That's the kind of evidence I'm asking for, these other guys could not state the facts. Do you have an article or study that confirms what you are claiming?
Do you know the difference between a fact and worshipful bootlicking?
Thank you. By that estimation there is plenty real time for humankind's migrations.The deluge is present in Hindu myths as well, but it's estimated to have occured at least around 12000-10000 BCE when the ice sheets began to melt increasing the sea levels.
The story of Dwarka submerging however looks more like a tsunami than a flood around (3067 minus 36) BCE.
Floods have occured many times in the past due to msny ice ages and fluctuations of ocean levels.
Still this is a very rough estimate. Mythological timeline suggests at least 4 million years ago for the great flood.
Agreed. How to prove Yahweh was there "at the beginning", even though El was considered "God" until Moses and "Yahweh"? Maybe find some archaeological stuff with His name on it from "everlasting", whatever that means.In about 2 mins you'll be asked for some sort of evidence or labelled as a christian hater.
Thank you. By that estimation there is plenty real time for humankind's migrations.