gnomon
Well-Known Member
This would require a fundamental paradigm shift in perspective that very few people would be capable of.
Maybe that's what's going to happen on December 20th, 2012.
Or whatever day it is.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
This would require a fundamental paradigm shift in perspective that very few people would be capable of.
Why is that? To have children that are planned for, wanted, and well cared for is not selfish. What kids need is parenting, not fathering or mothering. What's selfish is having kids without planning for, choosing to, or being prepared.To have children without providing those children with a father seems rather selfish.
That sounds like you.If one feels bad because of how others view that, how secure can that one be concerning that choice.
Yup. It's clear you've done no research whatsoever, or you'd know that the opposite of what you're saying is true. That's how I know your statements are bigoted; I've read the research.A bigot is a person who bases his or her opinions on his or her feelings without any regard of research.
All choices are not of equal value. It's better to only have kids if you plan for and are prepared to take it on. That's why, overall, homosexual parenting is better than heterosexual parenting.To imagine that all choices are of equal value is as bigoted and one who feels only his/her choices are valid.
Good. Then clearly, you support same-sex parenting, as the research shows that it's good for children.I've never suggested that I know it all or that I have not made dumb mistakes or thought dumb things, but I do not make it a habit of promoting my dumbness at the expense of thousands of years of Biblical history, nor would I intentionally place my desires ahead of the needs of children.
Maybe that's what's going to happen on December 20th, 2012.
Or whatever day it is.
Why can't you just admit you're wrong?
And your right?
And your right?
Maybe that's what's going to happen on December 20th, 2012.
Or whatever day it is.
Your not offending anyone, your just displaying your bigotry is all. I challenge you to walk up to a couple who one was infertile and whose child was born with the help of either a sperm donor or surrogate mother and tell them they are selfish, "uncool" parents.I didn't know one could committ fornication without having sex. Tell me, does this "concept" of yours also apply to the Virgin Mary?If you have accepted male sperm without being married to that male, that is fornication. It maybe, medically induced. It maybe without you ever seeing that individual; however, the result is the same.
Yes, it do feel that when any woman is inseminated with sperm that isn't her husbands, she is in reality participating in an act of fornication.
Sorry if anyone is offended. They have to come to their own conclusions and it is my hope that a "christian" would apply biblical knowledge and not just merely scientific authoritative jargon. That is not to say that there are not times the husband's sperm is injected into his wife by a doctor. In that case the sperm is that of the husband's and not some stranger with handsome attributes that the couple or a woman covets.
I have nothing against "infertal" couples adopting. That is an entirely different matter ---- but they should be married as husband and wife.
Oh Please! Not Howard Camping? The guy that believes salvation doesn't depend on one's faith --- only GOD's selection, and yet says that christian's who don't except his date of CHRIST's return are not going to be raptured. Sounds just like work to me!!!!!
Yes, LittleNipper, unlike you, I base my opinions on the research. Research shows that same-sex parents are at least as effective as heterosexual parents.
Oh Please! Not Howard Camping? The guy that believes salvation doesn't depend on one's faith --- only GOD's selection, and yet says that christian's who don't except his date of CHRIST's return are not going to be raptured. Sounds just like work to me!!!!!
Every reputable social scientist who's researched it.Whose research?
No group.What group?
Just to find out whether same-sex parents are effective.Do they have an agenda?
Probably out to impress with their awesome research skills would be my guess.Are they out to impress?
Actually yes. I'm right because I do not make claim to a moral high road and then turn around and call lesbian parents "uncool" based on faulty reasoning.
Really? I had no idea.Lesbians cannot have children naturally without male sperm.
Well, God or not, reproduction takes one of each. Parenting does not.GOD designed children to be the offspring of both a male and female.
And it doesn't make them not cool.Because a person is a lesbian doesn''t make them cool.
No, it can't. Your beliefs are not cool, period.And the same can be applied to my beliefs. But being able to take the heat ------ now, that may mean that one is very cool.
Let me ask you again, if God's design was male/female what about Virgin Mary? In your "theory" Jesus was the product of "fornication". No male was involved. Is Mary "uncool"?Lesbians cannot have children naturally without male sperm. GOD designed children to be the offspring of both a male and female. Because a person is a lesbian doesn''t make them cool. And the same can be applied to my beliefs. But being able to take the heat ------ now, that may mean that one is very cool.
Lesbians cannot have children naturally without male sperm. GOD designed children to be the offspring of both a male and female. Because a person is a lesbian doesn''t make them cool. And the same can be applied to my beliefs. But being able to take the heat ------ now, that may mean that one is very cool.
God no! that the mission that God gave you isn't it? the Apostle says Rom 1:26For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature.
Boys raised by Irish Catholic mothers are pressured to do one of three things in life; be a doctor, be a lawyer, or be a priest. Catholic mothers also want families and grandchildren. So boys are pressured to get married (if doctors or if lawyers) and propagate. I spent some early years living in Ireland, so I know this tradition. When a Catholic boy first reaslises his homosexual tendencies, he is faced with a conflict. His mother is constantly introducing to elegible girls (for marriage.)In that we agree they should segregate to a Church that should not call itself Christian, and their leaders (Gay priests) are to ordained Christian minister.
They were and many still are barbarians and savages. They think like Stone Age savages. Much of the Middle Eastern World is in that retrogressive cultural state. In western countries, homophobes often rely on and use Christian superstition and the Bible to fight the symbol of their internal sexual ambivalence. They try to twist already ambiguous verses to make them feel that they have the help of the Giant Human God of the Cosmos. Unfortunately for them God is imaginary and the failure to receive divine magical assistance, causes the homophobe to suffer anxiety, paranoia, and sometimes resort to murder of known openly homosexual men.I though that they have the right to kill the daughters that do not produce descendant to propagated their genes as commanded by God, but surely you know better.
I am not sure Muhammad believed in such barbaric savagery. Islam was culturally advanced up to the 9th Century. Then invasions by savages: Qarmations, Selkuks, Mamluks, Ottomans, Mongols, and Timurids occurred. Islamic Culture deteriorated from the greatness of the Caliphate of Bagdad and Cordoba. North Africa, Arabia, and Central Asia descended into the depravity, filth, and brutality of a dreadful Dark Ages. Today, the Muslim World is still largely wallowing in the mud and faeces of those Dark Ages. That accounts for their horrible treatment of women, their willingness to kill other Muslims for trivial points of dogma, and kill non-believers simply for existing. Muhammad strictly forbade killing fellow Muslims and forbade killing infidels who were not attacking Muslims. Like Christians in Europe's Dark Ages (the Age of Faith), Muslims now also pay no attention to the commandment "Thou Shalt Not Kill."Wrong! Muslims daughter must produce more Muslims they can be kill for inter-marrying they must not dishonor their fathers.