• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is promiscuous sexual behavior healthy?

Wirey

Wirey

Fartist
idav said:
Correct, only healthy promiscuous sex is healthy.
Click to expand...

How zen.

Tell me, and I mean this for everyone, why is abstaining from sex a good idea? If two people want to bump uglies (in my case, severely oversized uglies, hand to God), and they do, who did they hurt? Sex feels good. It's the beginning of life. It's what you were designed for (take a close look at a vagina or a scrotum and tell me that baby was built for viewing pleasure). It makes the participants happy, assuming they agreed to it in the first place. What's the downside? Christian guilt? Screw that! If you like her, and she likes you, and you're both available, go!

I refrain because I'm married. My kids need a home, and I love my wife. Me knocking boots with the secretaries would make her feel bad, so I don't. But if I was single my office would smell like the Mustang Ranch.
 
Revoltingest

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Wirey said:
How zen.
Tell me, and I mean this for everyone, why is abstaining from sex a good idea? If two people want to bump uglies (in my case, severely oversized uglies, hand to God), and they do, who did they hurt? Sex feels good. It's the beginning of life. It's what you were designed for (take a close look at a vagina or a scrotum and tell me that baby was built for viewing pleasure). It makes the participants happy, assuming they agreed to it in the first place. What's the downside? Christian guilt? Screw that! If you like her, and she likes you, and you're both available, go!
I refrain because I'm married. My kids need a home, and I love my wife. Me knocking boots with the secretaries would make her feel bad, so I don't. But if I was single my office would smell like the Mustang Ranch.
Click to expand...
You just need to avoid those new & improved drug-resistant bugs.
 
Revoltingest

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Wirey said:
That's why God invented Keflex. You ever see Crazy Horse using a saddle? Bareback is the only way to ride!
I'm kidding, of course. It's just the best way.
Click to expand...
Fembots are the future.....no diseases, & they can be programmed to fix you sammich aferwards. No cuddling either
 
Revoltingest

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Wirey said:
I must admit, the sandwich thing sounds good. But if you knocked one up, would it qualify as artificial insemination?
Click to expand...
It could be....if the fembot had a human egg within its intersticies.
Oh, what a cruel hoax that would be!
So some men might opt for gaybots, just to avoid the risk.
 
Wirey

Wirey

Fartist
Revoltingest said:
It could be....if the fembot had a human egg within its intersticies.
Oh, what a cruel hoax that would be!
So some men might opt for gaybots, just to avoid the risk.
Click to expand...

And now the Christians will be anti-robot. Thanks for pointing that out to them!
 
idav

idav

Being
Premium Member
Wirey said:
Tell me, and I mean this for everyone, why is abstaining from sex a good idea?
Click to expand...
Not necessary to abstain but some training couldn't hurt. You wouldn't try to run a marathon hopped up on twinkies would you.
 
Reptillian

Reptillian

Hamburgler Extraordinaire
Cyborg babies

35rffa.jpg
 
Wirey

Wirey

Fartist
Really, though, how many people here can say they didn't act like a total **** at least once in their life? When I first got divorced I musta slept with 40 girls in those first two months, and I'm not making any claim to quality. I would hit anyone. We all go through something like that at one point or another. I hope.
 
Wirey

Wirey

Fartist
Storm said:
Because I reject the concept of "****."
Click to expand...

Reject it? I embrace it! There is absolutely nothing wrong with wanting to feel physical pleasure as a mutually shared experience. You may call it something else if that feels better, but I freely admit to my inner ****. I'm the only guy on earth who went through therapy to get in touch with his feminine side so he could hit on it.
 
Storm

Storm

ThrUU the Looking Glass
Wirey said:
Reject it? I embrace it! There is absolutely nothing wrong with wanting to feel physical pleasure as a mutually shared experience. You may call it something else if that feels better, but I freely admit to my inner ****. I'm the only guy on earth who went through therapy to get in touch with his feminine side so he could hit on it.
Click to expand...
No, there isn't. Which is precisely why I reject that judgmental, prudish, and (let's face it) misogynistic concept.
 
Revoltingest

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
For our edification (dictionary.com):
Word Story
**** first appeared in the written language in 1402, according to the Oxford English Dictionary , that great repository of language information. At that time, **** meant roughly what one sense of slattern means today: a slovenly, untidy woman or girl. It also apparently meant “kitchen maid” (”She is a cheerful **** who keeps the pots scrubbed and the fires hot.”). By the end of the 15th century the sense “a woman given to immoral or improper conduct” had come into use, and it is the only meaning in use today. Interestingly, the same second meaning, a promiscuous woman, developed for the term slattern.


Woo hoo!
Now, I have "slattern" to add to my rhyming vocabulary.

 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top