outhouse
Atheistically
Sryriac Infancy Gospel 1:2-3 1:2-3
.
6th century, worthless historically speaking, for anything to do with Jesus.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Sryriac Infancy Gospel 1:2-3 1:2-3
.
Sryriac Infancy Gospel 1:2-3 1:2-3
Arabic Gospel of the Infancy of the Savior 5:110
Gospel of Thomas 1:4-9
Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew chapter 20
Gospel of James 8:1. 8:6
If you read the whole book(s) listed you will see many of the ideas from these text within the Quran.
It's because there aren't any to cite.You need to supply the actual verses that make your case, I don't see any.
You need to supply the actual verses that make your case, I don't see any.
6th century, worthless historically speaking, for anything to do with Jesus.
You need to supply the actual verses that make your case, I don't see any.
Some books do not have verses as many are not complete texts but fragments of texts. Besides many are short enough to read in less than 5 minutes which is not much time . You are capable of reading each on your own.
Apostolikon (Paul) and Marcionite Bible (Gospel of the Lord) is again fragments of texts in response to Marcion not his work itself. The responses are those of other early church fathers which formed the basis of modern Christianity. There is no surviving text from Maricon or his followers. There are no verses to be see as his work is an interpretation and statement of belief based on this interpretation. His work in part created a foundation of Gnostic Christianity in the east which was philosophically neoplatonism. A form of Christianity, and Gnosticism, which was present in Arabia, Syria, Levant, Egypt, Mesopotamia and Persia. Early Islamic philosophy is that of neoplatonism. This concept is not found in Judaism but in foreign translations of Judaism.
Which is based on early text such as James, which corroborates the story.
Originally Posted by Shad
The idea that Christ didn't die has roots in these versions of Christianity well before Islam.
Sources please.
The Infancy Gospel of Thomas
1 This little child Jesus when he was five years old was playing at the ford of a brook: and he gathered together the waters that flowed there into pools, and made them straightway clean, and commanded them by his word alone. 2 And having made soft clay, he fashioned thereof twelve sparrows.
Quran 3:49
And [make him] a messenger to the Children of Israel, [who will say], 'Indeed I have come to you with a sign from your Lord in that I design for you from clay [that which is] like the form of a bird, then I breathe into it and it becomes a bird by permission of Allah. And I cure the blind and the leper, and I give life to the dead - by permission of Allah. And I inform you of what you eat and what you store in your houses. Indeed in that is a sign for you, if you are believers.
Gospel of Pseudo-Mathew
CHAP. 20.-- And it came to pass on the third day of their journey, while they were walking, that the blessed Mary was fatigued by the excessive heat of the sun in the desert; and seeing a palm tree, she said to Joseph: Let me rest a little under the shade of this tree. Joseph therefore made haste, and led her to the palm, and made her come down from her beast. And as the blessed Mary was sitting there, she looked up to the foliage of the palm, and saw it full of fruit, and said to Joseph: I wish it were possible to get some of the fruit of this palm. And Joseph said to her: I wonder that thou sayest this, when thou seest how high the palm tree is; and that thou thinkest of eating of its fruit. I am thinking more of the want of water, because the skins are now empty, and we have none wherewith to refresh ourselves and our cattle. Then the child Jesus, with a joyful countenance, reposing in the bosom of His mother, said to the palm: O tree, bend thy branches, and refresh my mother with thy fruit. And immediately at these words the palm bent its top down to the very feet of the blessed Mary; and they gathered from it fruit, with which they were all refreshed. And after they had gathered all its fruit, it remained bent down, waiting the order to rise from Him who bad commanded it to stoop. Then Jesus said to it: Raise thyself, O palm tree, and be strong, and be the companion of my trees, which are in the paradise of my Father; and open from thy roots a vein of water which has been hid in the earth, and let the waters flow, so that we may be satisfied from thee. And it rose up immediately, and at its root there began to come forth a spring of water exceedingly clear and cool and sparkling. And when they saw the spring of water, they rejoiced with great joy, and were satisfied, themselves and all their cattle and their beasts. Wherefore they gave thanks to God.
Quran 19:22-26
So she conceived him, and she withdrew with him to a remote place. And the pains of childbirth drove her to the trunk of a palm tree. She said, "Oh, I wish I had died before this and was in oblivion, forgotten." But he called her from below her, "Do not grieve; your Lord has provided beneath you a stream. And shake toward you the trunk of the palm tree; it will drop upon you ripe, fresh dates. So eat and drink and be contented. And if you see from among humanity anyone, say, 'Indeed, I have vowed to the Most Merciful abstention, so I will not speak today to [any] man.' "
You can look up the rest if you want.
Also I said Marcion started up neoplatonism within gnostic Christianity. You argue against a point I never made.
"Wherefore he did not himself suffer death, but Simon, a certain man of Cyrene, being compelled, bore the cross in his stead; so that this latter being transfigured by him, that he might be thought to be Jesus, was crucified, through ignorance and error, while Jesus himself received the form of Simon, and, standing by, laughed at them. For since he was an incorporeal power, and the Nous (mind) of the unborn father, he transfigured himself as he pleased, and thus ascended to him who had sent him, deriding them, inasmuch as he could not be laid hold of, and was invisible to all"
The Second Discourse Of The Great Seth (55 said:And I was in the mouths of lions. And the plan which they devised about me to release their Error and their senselessness - I did not succumb to them as they had planned. But I was not afflicted at all. Those who were there punished me. And I did not die in reality but in appearance, lest I be put to shame by them because these are my kinsfolk. I removed the shame from me and I did not become fainthearted in the face of what happened to me at their hands. I was about to succumb to fear, and I <suffered> according to their sight and thought, in order that they may never find any word to speak about them. For my death, which they think happened, (happened) to them in their error and blindness, since they nailed their man unto their death. For their Ennoias did not see me, for they were deaf and blind. But in doing these things, they condemn themselves. Yes, they saw me; they punished me. It was another, their father, who drank the gall and the vinegar; it was not I. They struck me with the reed; it was another, Simon, who bore the cross on his shoulder. I was another upon Whom they placed the crown of thorns. But I was rejoicing in the height over all the wealth of the archons and the offspring of their error, of their empty glory. And I was laughing at their ignorance.
Why not look at the Quran verses I linked with gnostic verses?
paarsurrey said:This thread is for comparison of the text of Quran with narratives of Jewish Bible Torah.
So it would be off topic to to discuss the Christian Gospels here.
celal said:Interesting discussion. Yet somewhat futile to ask for proofs from some of the posters. After all, Quran is a fabrication built upon fabrications. It is built upon its primitive Jewish and Christian predecessors, selecting a chunk here and a shard there. On the first page of this thread, the poster "sees" with post #5, proved it conclusively. Yet, the discussion still goes on for another 34 pages.
It does seem illogical not demand the proof from the original claims(Qur'an), but demand it from others to continue to prove the negative.