Lol
What a load of bull that you spin...
There is no doubt at all that Hinduism and the younger Buddhism historically predated Jesus by centuries.
Hinduism grew from the Vedas scriptures, and the Vedas began, at the very least in 18th century BCE, hence the 2nd millennium BCE.
The most important Hindu epics - the Ramayana and the Mahabharata - both predated Jesus by 4 centuries at the very least. Jesus shared some characteristics of Krishna, an avatar of Vishnu who appeared in Mahabharata, is far older than that of Jesus.
And the claim of Jesus travelling to India after his SUPPOSED death, is pseudo-historical. You said that you don't believe in pseudoscience and pseudo-history, and yet this post of yours is just full of pseudo-crap.
The whole Jesus in India have already being dismissed as a myth, and yet you believe in this myth, tell me quite clearly you would believe in all sort of silliness.
Tell me, paarsurrey, can you quote anywhere in the Qur'an that Jesus have been to India?
I have read the Qur'an, and I know the Qur'an doesn't say Jesus has been to India. So if you didn't get it from the Qur'an, then where did you get this absurd claim?
Jesus teaching Buddhism and Hinduism to Indians...what a load of absurdities. You don't know what you are talking about, paarsurrey. You give me advice about education is clearly should be follow by you.