It is basically impossible to tell, isn't it?
People who care end up having to decide whether the Christian NT is lying, or else the Talmudic tradition is.
Assuming, of course, that at least one of the two is accurate, which is unproven at best.
It's a free forum. right ?
If we're limiting comments to people who cares, you should be the least person to comment on such relegion discussion. Right ?
Or maybe she had a very accomodating husband, perhaps one who valued her and her child over the letter of the law?
There is beauty in loving and forgiving, you know.
Perhaps for the same reasons why atheists and alcohol-drinkers are not always punished according to Muslim law even when they live under Muslim law?
Namely, because people usually know better than to expect the law to be wiser and more loving than themselves?
In such ethical societies that leaves according to Allah's law, what you call "accommodating husband" is called cuckold,pander, pimp, procurer
Even neighbors, religious people don't stay silent
Such allegations don't simply go like this and then Rabbis are repeating these allegations for centuries in books
There should be a good reason to shut everyone's mouth. The explanation is in Quran only. The child talked to all and set his mother innocent. The laws wasn't applied, they set her free but Rabbis kept the allegations in books.
This is why these are lies