McBell
Unbound
Deja MooYes, since it does have worth, and it is deserving in many of its teachings. Where do you think merit derives from?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Deja MooYes, since it does have worth, and it is deserving in many of its teachings. Where do you think merit derives from?
Hi LionDog
So Correct me if I'm wrong. If the number of people reading a book gives that book a certain merit. Can we say the same thing about Harry Potter:sarcastic.
For me Merit has more to do with the person reading it. I can read,for example, The Gospel of Thomas or the Gospel of Truth, and to me they have the same merit as any Christian Bible and Jewish Torah.
O.K., lost me with the distinction created by "the."Belief is not the Torah, belief is Torah.
Credibility is a rather subjective thing, don't you think?For a divinely inspired book, most bibles i've seen are pretty barbaric and do not so much as promote equality between everyone.
I thought God would have also mentioned how to deal with those damn evolutionists/scientists as well as that pestilence on the church called homosexuality
Credibility is a rather subjective thing, don't you think?
Much along the lines of pretty or evil or perverted.
Hello everyone, I've been slowly reading debates on here for some months now and am very interested in science/religion. This will be my first go at a post so bare with me.
My main question right now has to do with Christianity and the credibility of the Bible. Most of my family is Christian and believe the Bible is the real inspired word of God, yet there is (as i see it) absolutely no proof of any such thing.
I see the Bible no different than any other book (written by man).
I understand that it's more than one book and has many authors, written thousands of years ago, but my point is that we can compare it, side by side, to any other book or text of philosophy, history, psychology, fiction, non-fiction, etc.. and it's still
just a book.
So I suppose the point is how and/or why do believers claim that the Bible is inspired by "God" with no evidence?
Maybe this is where you need faith?
Please reply and post your opinions and excuse me if I'm running circles.
It is interesting to see the number of threads and posts the speak of "the Bible." The first question that always comes to mind when I read questions like yours is Which Bible? The so-called Bible now comes in so many different variations - translations - each with significant contextual, doctronical differences, yes even theological differences. Making "judgments" about "the Bible" just does not seem to make any sense ....
Yes, very true. That's another good point, which I believe shows how ambiguous the Bible really is.The first question that always comes to mind when I read questions like yours is Which Bible? The so-called Bible now comes in so many different variations - translations - each with significant contextual, doctronical differences, yes even theological differences. Making "judgments" about "the Bible" just does not seem to make any sense... - DadBurnett
Yes, very true. That's another good point, which I believe shows how ambiguous the Bible really is.
However, I'm reading from and referring to the New Living Translation Bible, sometimes along with a Commentary, once radio-program made 5-part series book (that my father introduced me to) called Thru The Bible, by James Vernon McGee.
I've read many books from the Bible (NLT or King James Version) without ever using other-source commentary.
But I wonder at times how Biblical Scholars or Doctors like J.Vernon McGee have come to their own conclusions (of verses) without ruining the integrity of, or superimposing more into the message than there really is. Like for instance, I feel that his commentary (In Genesis) leads to assumptions of or imposes some scientific-findings into the message or scripture, that are not evident or are so ambiguous that almost anything could apply to the verse. I suppose this is why we have multiple versions or translations of the Bible and so many different levels of interpretation.
Kind of how Astrology works? Some messages can apply to anyone or anything.
- If anyone knows about J.Vernon McGee or has any interesting information regarding him, please drop a line.
Yes the bible is credible there is no doubting the fact because it is divine and inspirational to many.
Is the Bible's claim of divine inspiration credible (worth believing), based on any facts?my question is credible as what? - Kai
The bible is only as authentic as your heart allows it to be. Really meditate on that for a while.Hello everyone, I've been slowly reading debates on here for some months now and am very interested in science/religion. This will be my first go at a post so bare with me.
My main question right now has to do with Christianity and the credibility of the Bible. Most of my family is Christian and believe the Bible is the real inspired word of God, yet there is (as i see it) absolutely no proof of any such thing.
I see the Bible no different than any other book (written by man).
I understand that it's more than one book and has many authors, written thousands of years ago, but my point is that we can compare it, side by side, to any other book or text of philosophy, history, psychology, fiction, non-fiction, etc.. and it's still
just a book.
So I suppose the point is how and/or why do believers claim that the Bible is inspired by "God" with no evidence?
Maybe this is where you need faith?
Please reply and post your opinions and excuse me if I'm running circles.
Have you ever read Issac Asimov's views on Astrology? - DadBurnett
What exactly does this mean?The bible is only as authentic as your heart allows it to be.
What do you mean by "never feel right reading it"?So if the promises of the bible don't do it for you, than you will never feel right reading it.
I guess it seems pretty self-evident. I will try to simplify it more, but it is already reduced about as small as it can go.What exactly does this mean?
One can read the bible as literature and nothing more. Always skeptical of those that believe it to be holy. Yet, they may find something of worth in the bible, they will never feel right about many things in the bible, because they simply don't believe it.What do you mean by "never feel right reading it"?
not really.Hope that answered your questions.
not really.
It sounds to me as though you are merely saying "You have to already believe it to believe it."
not really.
It sounds to me as though you are merely saying "You have to already believe it to believe it."