Well, the thread is long.
Some new people repeat what was said before and I get tired of answering the same thing several times.
I am pretty good, thanks for asking. What about you?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Is the evolutionary doctrine a racist doctrine?
- Thread starter Eli G
- Start date
Some new people repeat what was said before and I get tired of answering the same thing several times.
Viker
Your beloved eccentric Auntie Cristal
Hominidae - WikipediaThere are homosexuals who do not want to be called by the biological sex with which they were born... Isn't that a more realistic criterion than calling people apes for a doctrine that is not even believed by everyone?
Biology does not call humans "apes." It is the acolytes of evolutionism who do that.
Pogo
Well-Known Member
You are still 0 for post count in getting anything right. You don't even know what a homosexual is.There are homosexuals who do not want to be called by the biological sex with which they were born... Isn't that a more realistic criterion than calling people apes for a doctrine that is not even believed by everyone?
Biology does not call humans "apes." It is the acolytes of evolutionism who do that.
Believing false things does not make them true no matter how many times you repeat them.
By what biological criteria are we not animals?
Viker
Your beloved eccentric Auntie Cristal
I'm wonderful. My dogs are doing great. They both got good grades at the vet today.
Happy dogs ... nobody calls them "apes".
Pogo
Well-Known Member
Just one?
Pogo
Well-Known Member
That is because they are canines but congratulations on your second correct statement.Happy dogs ... nobody calls them "apes".
Human's so called "racial diversity" is too insignificant to need any special explanation. Just a few genetic differences caused by adaptive evolution by populations living in different geographical zones, and some genetic drift caused changes.I am mestizo, my mother is mulatto, daughter of mulatto and white, granddaughter of black and white ... and my father is white. Racism was a totally non-existent thing in my upbringing environment.
That does not mean that I do not recognize the racial diversity of the human race as a result of different factors that do not interest my topic, but that contribute to the beauty and diversity of God's creation, just as there are different colors and varieties in flowers, butterflies. , fish, birds, etc.
However, I do not see how evolutionary doctrine can fit within human racial diversity.
Someone who knows how to explain without giving so much detours and throwing smoke screens? The truth is that the answers given by the majority of acolytes of that doctrine are shameful.
Viker
Your beloved eccentric Auntie Cristal
They're most certainly canidae and nuttin else.Happy dogs ... nobody calls them "apes".
Viker
Your beloved eccentric Auntie Cristal
An ancient and not very common one. Booger is likely long extinct.
They exist only as human created constructs:- like money, nation states, party affiliations etc. They do not exist in nature/biology. Difference between two sparrows living in two cities is usually more than the difference between African people and Nordic people.Human races DO EXIST.
Look at your ID.
Viker
Your beloved eccentric Auntie Cristal
Those are mere arbitrary ethnic identification. I'm Melungeon but I am also "white". If this were the old Jim Crow days I would be classified "negro". It's all bs.Human races DO EXIST.
Look at your ID.
Obviously not. dogs are not apes.
Viker
Your beloved eccentric Auntie Cristal
Nope. Dogs are not apes. Sorry.
Viker
Your beloved eccentric Auntie Cristal
Then what race am I?