Of course not. Neither human beings are.Nope. Dogs are not apes. Sorry.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Of course not. Neither human beings are.Nope. Dogs are not apes. Sorry.
Humans are most certainly hominidae. No way around it. Just like foxes and Dobermans are canidae.Of course not. Neither human beings are.
So, don't you know how in the world a person's race is determined?I have African ancestry. Ashkenazi ancestry. Cherokee ancestry. German ancestry. I lose count sometimes.
Yes, but that ancestor was neither a dog or an ape, it was a mammal and you might notice that both apes and dogs still are mammals. that is the way evolution works and Linnaeus figured this part out in 1753, come on and catch up.Don't apes and dogs share a common ancestor? LOL.
Nice word: Hominidae ... very different than "apes".Humans are most certainly hominidae. No way around it. Just like foxes and Dobermans are canidae.
It's an insignificant trick of light due to melanin. It's no big deal.The skin is considered an organ, so a variation in it indicates an important change... and that characteristic among others determines the race.
Skin color is not a human construct, LOL.
it aint, he is human, that is all and descended from the same set of primates that you are.So, don't you know how in the world a person's race is determined?
Yes. By arbitrary means. Fools look and make hasty conclusions.So, don't you know how in the world a person's race is determined?
Oh. Please answer my question.So, don't you know how in the world a person's race is determined?
It's used to better clarify the great ape family.Nice word: Hominidae ... very different than "apes".
No dogs are not apes or fish but they are all sarcoptegyrians.So, dogs are apes also ... and human fish, LOL.
The Caucasian race (also Caucasoid,[a] Europid, or Europoid)[2] is an obsolete racial classification of humans based on a now-disproven theory of biological race.[3][4][5] The Caucasian race was historically regarded as a biological taxon which, depending on which of the historical race classifications was being used, usually included ancient and modern populations from all or parts of Europe, Western Asia, Central Asia, South Asia, North Africa, and the Horn of Africa.[6][7]A person's race is not determined by his/her origins, but by what he/she look like.
Skin color (race in general) is a human characteristic. We must not make that reality taboo.
Races are part of humans like colors are part of flowers. Everything is beautiful in its diversity.
If you saw me you would think I am native American or possibly middle eastern. A few here have seen me. But I still pass as mostly "white". I'm a mold breaker, I suppose. My best friend, black, calls me black. She spotted the African in me.A person's race is not determined by their origins, but by what they look like.
Skin color (race in general) is a human characteristic. We must not make that reality taboo.
Races are part of humans like colors are part of flowers. Everything is beautiful in its diversity.
Citation needed. Like this:There are homosexuals who do not want to be called by the biological sex with which they were born... Isn't that a more realistic criterion than calling people apes for a doctrine that is not even believed by everyone?
Biology does not call humans "apes." It is the acolytes of evolutionism who do that.
One it is a minor change and varies even in close relations.The skin is considered an organ, so a variation in it indicates an important change... and that characteristic among others determines the race.
Skin color is not a human construct, LOL.
No. You really should go back and retake 6th grade biology.So, dogs are apes also ... and human fish, LOL.
Goat?Then what race am I?