The man who would commit rape of a mini skirt wearing woman is likely to be the kind of man who would also rape a covered woman, all the mini skirt did was make it just that bit easier for the rapist to get violently aroused and commit the act, the skirt highlighted to the rapist what was already on his mind, either sub consciously or consciously.
Yes. I think this is the logic used by my good scandanvian friend. Have you heard of the mass selling of date rape drugs? or Spiked drinks?
Again I am not talking about rape but the sort of beastly men it draws. Here he is so gentle, so civil, offers a drink. she think ah such a gentleman. But make sure not to turn head round as he just spiked the drink with a pill. Next this woman is in a hotel dazed and confused and naked.
She is sick and vohmeting from her discust as to what has just happened.
Remember it all started from that mini/micro skirt plus secular system promotion of free mixing.
The opposite is true, a man who would never rape sees the mini skirt wearing woman and his mind is focussed on acting appropriately respectfully and he will do so.
Yes good logical reasoning here. Ofcourse modest clothing is just a preventive measure and security. It does not nessecarly mean that it will keep every evil away but just an added protection.
That is why the islamic system and christianity promote this modest clothing as the majistic creator is all knowin most wise.
A rapist is weak in themselves, they cannot control themselves and do not realize that when they rape they are committing an evil upon the victim AND themselves. One of their weaknesses is that they think they are powerful, yet truly their actions reveal their weakness.
They are the weakest of all creation and the sickest. But it is their fault or is it the fault of the system that promotes a billion money Sex industry that makes them after prolonged times of watching and programming. After this watching and programming all is on their mind is how to satisfy their desire.
Now it is truth that there are rapists in society and covering up is one pragmatic way for women to not highlight to that weak man his weakness and hence the covering up makes it less likely that rape will occur in that one instance.
It's not fair, it's not right, it shouldn't be this way, but pragmatically it is just truth that some are so pathetically weak that they cannot contain themselves from this horrendous act.
Again well said. The islamic system gives this extra protection so does christinaity. Each advocate the modest dress code. Both christinity and islam and if you pay attention cover their hair and their beutified ornements.
If I may...
There is a recovering heroin addict who always used to shoot up whilst watching Star Trek. Would it be kind to place that recovering addict in a room, sit them down in front of a Star Trek movie and put all the implements needed for shooting heroin right next to them. Sure they might be strong enough to fully recover, but their weakness and temptation may also overwhelm them.
Yes your right. It is called sex addiction. But only these men know that this backward secular system is their cause of their illness.
As I adhere to the islamic system. Some men just love sex more then others. Therefore 1.2.3 or wives is not a bad idea if they can afford it and these woman are happy with such arrangements.
This seems to me the concept that 301 is discussing, with the terminology of 'meat on display'. Incidentally I find that phrase disgusting and it reveals that I would never be a rapist for despising the term itself reveals that one does not think this way and hence would not do that act, whilst someone who does think "meat on display" is the one who might be tempted to commit the act, for the degrading of woman to meat has already occurred. This of course assumes that "meat" has a negative connotation, which to me in this context it certainly does.
It is not me who did the degrading nor the use of this disgusting phrase but it is the secular system that forced this onto its own subjects. Actually it is the secular system that said it with their own doing.
Seems to me a case of where teaching to boys or men, that women who show their bodies are "meat on display" is counterproductive to the concept of being strong, for the lesson should not end with, they are "meat on display" but should end with "do not act on your temptation if your temptation is rape" or better yet "whatever she wears treat her with respect" or "Always treat her with respect".
Try telling that to secular educational system and you will find it very hard. therefore it is a lost battle.
Whilst likewise covering up the women to reduce temptation also gives the boys and men little or no opportunity to practice being strong for they are assumed to already be weak. Very counter productive in my opinion.
Actually it does give a sign a strong sign that I am not here on earth for one thing. Whether you are strong or weak I dont care.
Where the attitude of "meat on display" allows others to feel that the victim got what she deserved when raped, this in my opinion is another horrendous act for it affirms that the mans' weakness is ok and hence makes that weakness ingrained in the rapist AND others, which is another disgustingly counter productive social outcome of the concept in my opinion.
I did not say that the rape victim is the sole reason. All I said it does not help and you have also confirmed it by your 3 first paragraphs.
Therefore the secular system dress code is the most oppressive to woman's intellegence, intelect and overall behaviour of being seen as a respectable wife, daughter and sister.
Therefore the secular system dress code is the most oppressive to woman's honour.
