• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Israel attacks gaza strip

Status
Not open for further replies.

fullyveiled muslimah

Evil incarnate!
Luminous I appreciate your replies, but I would differ with you about the authority of Hamas. I mean, the US and Israel wanted the Gazans to hold an election, and when they picked the party they wanted and not the one US wanted it was denied. What message does that send the Gazans? It sends the message that says, you will obey us or you will stay in the situation you are in and we won't help you, you choose. It sends the message that the process of democracy that is hailed as the greatest government type since sliced bread, doesn't really work.

The sentiment that "we don't deal with terrorists" isn't working here. Continuing to say that you (Hamas) cannot be included directly with any deals, you must let others decide your fate doesn't work. If Israel is truly commited to peace as it claims, you have to try something else. Just like Hamas needs to try something else other than those crude rockets. Hamas has never been tested with their authority being recognized. It was immediately ignored as a terrorist group, but it might be worth everyones time to give them that shot. Give them the opportunity to run the place and see what else they do. You may be surprised that with the business of life, they may become less interested in trying to bomb Israeli towns.

As far as Israel controlling the area forever, that may not be as far fetched as you think. I'm sure they don't want to but they feel they have to. I mean if you lift yor foot off their necks and give them a second to breathe they may retaliate. This is the thing Israel don't want. No retaliation. That's what I think a ceasefire means to them, for the Gazans to just forget everything that happened and never raise arms again no matter the situation. Israel must keep control of the area or risk the rise of power from the Palestinians in that area. With power the Gazans may not be so quick to forgive the wrongs meted out to them. However, you can control people by their stomachs. Keep someone hungry and halfway dependant on you, and you have them. It's not too much they can do to you if they are hungry. The only other option is to kill them all. You may think that extreme and it is, but it's real and the way things are shaping up Israeli government isn't all that opposed to the idea. Think about it as long as they say they aren't targeting civies they can keep killing them anyways. As long as they say Hamas is using them all for human shields they can bomb anyplace they chose, at any time without having to offer up any more of an explanation than that. Before you know it, there isn't anyone left in Gaza worth mentioning, problem solved. Israel can't very well say that's what they are doing and stick to it, but they can get it achieved while the world watches it and does nothing. If not by bomb then by starvation and illness. If the sewers aren't working properly you're talking about diseases just from filth. Not to mention from an Islamic pov clean water is of extreme importance. If not enough medicine can come through people will die from simple complications and illnesses.



luminous said:
puppet govenment? how so is the other party a Puppet, if they agree with the US and Israel on not being radicals, then they are puppet?

In a way yeah. See it's all about the intent. If I am willing to go the way of peace while at the same time having my own authority equal to and independent of you, then I am not a puppet government. I am acting on my own and on the behalf of my people to be peaceful with you. However, if I go the way you want me to because my authority is directly connected with what you allow it to be, then I am a puppet of yours. If the Gazans had chosen such a party to lead them, they would have still got shafted just in a different way. Leaders in puppet governments do only what they are told so that they do not lose whatever perks and the appearance of power that they have. They don't do what is best for their people, because if what the people want conflict with what the puppeteer wants, then the people can forget it. The West Bank government is a puppet government, because it doesn't put up any fight, it has no real authority, and it is afraid to speak out strongly against the murder going on in the strip. In fact it cannot speak out strongly, it must side with Israel pretty much because if not then his bootleg authority gets taken.
 

England my lionheart

Rockerjahili Rebel
Premium Member
Luminous I appreciate your replies, but I would differ with you about the authority of Hamas. I mean, the US and Israel wanted the Gazans to hold an election, and when they picked the party they wanted and not the one US wanted it was denied. What message does that send the Gazans? It sends the message that says, you will obey us or you will stay in the situation you are in and we won't help you, you choose. It sends the message that the process of democracy that is hailed as the greatest government type since sliced bread, doesn't really work.

The sentiment that "we don't deal with terrorists" isn't working here. Continuing to say that you (Hamas) cannot be included directly with any deals, you must let others decide your fate doesn't work. If Israel is truly commited to peace as it claims, you have to try something else. Just like Hamas needs to try something else other than those crude rockets. Hamas has never been tested with their authority being recognized. It was immediately ignored as a terrorist group, but it might be worth everyones time to give them that shot. Give them the opportunity to run the place and see what else they do. You may be surprised that with the business of life, they may become less interested in trying to bomb Israeli towns.

As far as Israel controlling the area forever, that may not be as far fetched as you think. I'm sure they don't want to but they feel they have to. I mean if you lift yor foot off their necks and give them a second to breathe they may retaliate. This is the thing Israel don't want. No retaliation. That's what I think a ceasefire means to them, for the Gazans to just forget everything that happened and never raise arms again no matter the situation. Israel must keep control of the area or risk the rise of power from the Palestinians in that area. With power the Gazans may not be so quick to forgive the wrongs meted out to them. However, you can control people by their stomachs. Keep someone hungry and halfway dependant on you, and you have them. It's not too much they can do to you if they are hungry. The only other option is to kill them all. You may think that extreme and it is, but it's real and the way things are shaping up Israeli government isn't all that opposed to the idea. Think about it as long as they say they aren't targeting civies they can keep killing them anyways. As long as they say Hamas is using them all for human shields they can bomb anyplace they chose, at any time without having to offer up any more of an explanation than that. Before you know it, there isn't anyone left in Gaza worth mentioning, problem solved. Israel can't very well say that's what they are doing and stick to it, but they can get it achieved while the world watches it and does nothing. If not by bomb then by starvation and illness. If the sewers aren't working properly you're talking about diseases just from filth. Not to mention from an Islamic pov clean water is of extreme importance. If not enough medicine can come through people will die from simple complications and illnesses.





In a way yeah. See it's all about the intent. If I am willing to go the way of peace while at the same time having my own authority equal to and independent of you, then I am not a puppet government. I am acting on my own and on the behalf of my people to be peaceful with you. However, if I go the way you want me to because my authority is directly connected with what you allow it to be, then I am a puppet of yours. If the Gazans had chosen such a party to lead them, they would have still got shafted just in a different way. Leaders in puppet governments do only what they are told so that they do not lose whatever perks and the appearance of power that they have. They don't do what is best for their people, because if what the people want conflict with what the puppeteer wants, then the people can forget it. The West Bank government is a puppet government, because it doesn't put up any fight, it has no real authority, and it is afraid to speak out strongly against the murder going on in the strip. In fact it cannot speak out strongly, it must side with Israel pretty much because if not then his bootleg authority gets taken.

I think its called trust and pride,Palestine has a lot of pride,it neither wants or asks for aid but can have it in abundance and nothing to do with being a puppet government,placing in power of your country any political partyhas a duty to do whats best for their people and in my country each party has a manifesto which is the way they intend to rule.
 

fullyveiled muslimah

Evil incarnate!
I would contend that one of the reasons Gazans don't really want to ask for aid is because they want to have their own economy. You know industry, and work and that sort of thing. When you live in a war zone regardless of who made it that way, it's hard to concentrate on those things. You just worry about living each day and eating, and shelter. It's a big worry there. When you realize that you could have those things, but the main reason you can't have it is because a people who have assumed authority over you decide that it is up to them to blockade you and put a tye of sanction on you, it makes one bitter towards those people. The populace in the strip may not all agree with Hamas either, but when they think about the hardships they have to go through daily, they probably aren't all that moved when Israelis suffer too. Call it right or wrong but really it's human nature.
 

England my lionheart

Rockerjahili Rebel
Premium Member
I would contend that one of the reasons Gazans don't really want to ask for aid is because they want to have their own economy. You know industry, and work and that sort of thing. When you live in a war zone regardless of who made it that way, it's hard to concentrate on those things. You just worry about living each day and eating, and shelter. It's a big worry there. When you realize that you could have those things, but the main reason you can't have it is because a people who have assumed authority over you decide that it is up to them to blockade you and put a tye of sanction on you, it makes one bitter towards those people. The populace in the strip may not all agree with Hamas either, but when they think about the hardships they have to go through daily, they probably aren't all that moved when Israelis suffer too. Call it right or wrong but really it's human nature.

I would like to see them with their own economy but the world will not have empathy with an organisation like Hamas for their charter alone,thats without anything else,they must go a different route to be accepted.
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
From IranAlmanac News:
Hamas Is a Terrorist Group

In a December 30, 2008 communiqué, the Iranian student group Daftar-e Tahkim-e Vahdat – Taif-e 'Alameh (the Office for Strengthening Unity – Clerics Circle, hereafter referred to as "Daftar-e Tahkim-e Vahdat") condemned Hamas, calling it a "terrorist group." It said that Hamas's use of civilians to protect it from Israel's attacks was inhumane, and criticized the Iranian regime for arming Hamas, claiming that as a result Iran "has the blood of innocents on its hands."

Following are excerpts from the communiqué, from statements by the secretary of Daftar-e Tahkim-e Vahdat – Taif-e 'Alameh, and from a reaction by an Iranian government daily.(1)

Those Who Have Armed and Encouraged... Hamas Have Innocent Blood on Their Hands

The communiqué stated: "Those who have armed and encouraged groups like Hamas – which only yesterday did not hide its sympathy for the criminal Saddam Hussein, and which declared three days of mourning after his death – have innocent blood on their hands: [the blood of those killed] in the [recent] hostilities [in Gaza]. Now it is they who must be accountable to humanity, and it is they who must explain this tragic situation.

"Israel's current crimes in Gaza are strongly condemned – but it is equally [important] to condemn the terror organizations that use kindergartens and hospitals as a shield against the [Israeli] attacks. [Hamas's use of human shields] prepares the ground for intensified bombardment [by Israel] and for the killing of children and civilians, and [therefore] it is an inhuman act.

"Daftar-e Tahkim-e Vahdat strongly condemns the current situation in the Gaza Strip and the killing of civilians and innocents. It believes that the sacrifice of defenseless people – especially children – [in Gaza] is the result of other conflicts in the regional and international arena.

"It had been expected that peace and human rights organizations would have done more to stop this inhuman slaughter before the disaster reached such [devastating] proportions – despite the difficulties thrown up by certain leaders..."(2)

Daftar-e Tahkim-e Vahdat Secretary: Ahmadinejad's Government Is Using the Gaza Crisis to Settle Political Scores

Daftar-e Tahkim-e Vahdat secretary, Mehdi Arabshahi, accused circles close to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of taking advantage of the situation in Gaza to crack down on human rights organizations in Iran, and to silence his opponents. Arabshahi said: "Unfortunately, we see that in Iran itself, a faction that outwardly pretends to be sympathetic to the Palestinians [actually] regards the [Gaza] tragedy as an opportunity to stifle the voices of the [Iranian] human rights [organizations]. [This faction] has launched harsh attacks against human rights activists and against political factions critical [of the regime]. [Since the beginning of the Israeli offensive], the offices of [Shirin Ebadi's] human rights organization have been illegally closed; [union official] [Ibrahim] Madadi has been arrested;(3) 11 [more] teachers were arrested today, and numerous students were expelled from the universities of Shiraz and Lorestan..."

Arabshahi then referred to the daily newspaper Kargozaran, which was closed down by the regime for publishing the Daftar-e Tahkim-e Vahdat communiqué (see below). He explained that the publication of the communiqué was only an excuse to close the paper: "Sadly, those who have long been waiting for an chance to silence the media [outlets] critical of Ahmadinejad, in advance of the presidential elections, have found that this moment – when the [Iranians] are emotionally preoccupied with the Gaza disaster – is a golden opportunity to realize this aspiration...

"This group, which now raises a great outcry against any view different [from its own], has already shown that it does not believe its own proclamations in the slightest, and that its only goal is to settle political scores. To wit, [this group did not protest when] Esfandiar Rahim Mashaii, Ahmadinejad's deputy and a member of his government, made declarations in favor of friendship with Israel, which were [completely] at odds with the slogans and claims of this faction... "(4)

The Regime Reacts: Closes Kargozaran, Bashes Daftar-e Tahkim-e Vahdat

On December 31, 2008, one day after it published excerpts from the Daftar-e Tahkim-e Vahdat communiqué, the daily Kargozaran was closed down by Ahmadinejad's government.(5) In a December 31, 2008 article, the daily Kayhan, which is close to Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, lambasted the group, calling it illegal and saying that its "declarations are completely identical to official proclamations of Zionist officials," and attacked Kargozaran for publishing the group's "insolent communiqué." Kayhan stated that Kargozaran was serving as a mouthpiece for Zionist propaganda, just like the Israeli Persian-language radio station. It added: "The Hamas fighters are an integral part of the people of Gaza, and there is not a single report that they are taking refuge in kindergartens, [especially since they are familiar with] Israel's record, and know full well that the occupiers of Jerusalem never spare hospitals and kindergartens."(6)

In its January 1, 2009 editorial, the official Iranian news agency IRNA stated that the Daftar-e Tahkim-e Vahdat communiqué was identical to statements by Israel's ambassador to London in a CNN interview that aired on December 30, 2008, the day the communiqué was published. It added that the similarity between the Daftar-e Tahkim-e Vahdat's positions and those of the Zionist regime officials proved that there were strategic relations between them.(7)

Endnotes:

(1) The Daftar-e Tahkim-e Vahdat – Taif-e 'Alameh is a local branch of the umbrella group Daftar-e Tahkim-e Vahdat – the Office for Strengthening Unity – which has branches at universities across Iran. It is important to note that this group's opinions do not reflect the opinions of most of the other branches.
(2) Bu-Ali Sina University students' newspaper (Hamedan, Iran), December 30, 2008.
(3) Madadi, who is deputy secretary of the Tehran and Suburbs Bus Company Workers Union, was arrested on December 27, 2008.
(4) Amir Kabir University students' newspaper (Tehran, Iran), December 31, 2008.
(5) Fars, December 31, 2008.
(6) Kayhan (Iran), December 31, 2008.
(7) IRNA (Iran), January 1, 2009.

Jan 6, 2009​
Remarkable ...
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
Similarly:
Israel Faces Iran in Gaza

Those 40 km missiles Hamas is unleashing against Israeli cities are certainly not "amateur rockets… nagging the residents" of Israeli cities, as a Palestinian journalist recently wrote in a Washington Post op-ed.

The press calls the rockets "Grads" or "Katyushas," the Russian name given several generations ago to the original Soviet-made surface-to-surface missiles. Today, it would be more correct to label some of the missiles by their real name, the "Arash," the name given to them by their Iranian manufacturers. The long-range 120 mm mortars raining down on Israel are also Iranian in origin. The mortars are equipped with auxiliary motors to increase their range from six to ten kilometers.

The longest range "Grads" were manufactured in China and but many of these too were smuggled to Hamas via Iran. Visitors to Sderot's rocket heap museum of spent missiles can view Iranian-made weapons for themselves.

Throughout 2008, the Iranian Arashes and mortars were fired from Gaza with deadly results. In February 2008 the mortars were fired at Kibbutz Sa’ad. In June the mortars were used against Kibbutz Nirim, killing one and wounding four. In November, eight soldiers were wounded by such a mortar at Nahal Oz. The Arash missiles were fired against Ashkelon on several occasions during 2008.

The Long History of Palestinian-Iranian Cooperation

The Islamic Republic worked closely with Yasser Arafat for decades, particularly after the Oslo agreements granted Arafat a foothold in the Palestinian territories. Arafat’s relationship with Ayatollah Khomeini predates the 1979 Iranian revolution.

Former CIA senior officer Robert Baer details the Iranian-Palestinian relationship in his book, See No Evil: The True Story of a Ground Soldier in the CIA’s War on Terrorism. "Arafat had put his entire worldwide terrorist network at Iran’s disposal," Baer pointed out. "Having been forced out of Beirut in 1982 by the Israelis, he had handed it over lock, stock, and barrel to the Iranians for safekeeping."

The liaison between Arafat and Iran was maintained by none other than master terrorist Imad Mughniyeh, a former member of Arafat’s Force 17, the mastermind of anti-American bombings in Lebanon, the man behind the bombings of Israeli and Jewish institutions in Argentina, and the alleged chief planner for the 2006 Hizbullah war against Israel. Mughniyeh was killed in his car by a bomb in a Damascus suburb in February 2008.

Long ago, Iran undertook a major operation to supply weapons to the Palestinians. The massive inventory of the Santorini and Karine-A, two freighters captured by Israel in 2001 and 2002, including dozens of Arash missiles and hundreds of 120 mm mortars. After the capture of the ships, it can be assumed that Iran dispatched new arms shipments which made their way to Gaza through the Sinai tunnels and other seaborne smuggling efforts. Shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles and anti-tank Saggers were also captured on the ships, and they too are presumably now in the Palestinian arsenal and will be used against Israeli aircraft and tanks.

Was the Islamic University in Gaza also an Iranian Base?

When Israeli air force jets bombed the Islamic University in the Gaza, the BBC declared that "a significant cultural symbol for Hamas" had been hit. It is evident that the university was also a major part of Hamas’s weapons development and storage network.

A New York Times report on internecine Palestinian clashes at Islamic University stated, "Fatah said its men had raided the university because Hamas militants had been firing mortars from the grounds. There was shooting from the university, and it is a place for weapons storage," said Maher Mikdad, a Fatah spokesman. In another interview with the Times, a Fatah spokesman stated, "The Islamic University was used as a base for Hamas gunmen." Earlier, Fatah-affiliated security officers captured an Iranian general at the school. They claimed he was "supervising manufacturing weapons and explosives for Hamas," according to Yediot Ahranot. "The source told Ynet that the expert was in charge of several labs in the university, mainly chemistry labs, in which he trained Hamas activists, most of them women, [to] manufacture the explosives. At least five Iranian citizens were arrested during a raid at the Islamic University, a Hamas stronghold in Gaza City. Hundreds of weapons and a lathe for the production of Qassam rockets were seized in the raid. The Palestinian source added that at least 20 women, some of them students, were arrested in the labs supervised by the Iranian expert, who was mainly involved in developing shells and rockets, but also explosives."

Israeli ground troops in Gaza are undoubtedly encountering extensive Hamas bunker and tunnel systems. Hundreds of Hamas tunnels from the Sinai keep Gaza armed and fed. Two years ago, these tunnels were used to attack an IDF unit and capture Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit. But it should be recalled that the use of tunnels and extensive bunkers were tactics taught by Hezbollah and the Iranians. In July 2006, a garrulous officer in the Iranian Revolutionary Guard revealed to the Arabic publication Sharq al Awsat that Iranian diplomats smuggled North Korean experts into Lebanon under the guise of "domestic workers." They joined "hundreds of Iranian engineers and technicians… to build a 25 kilometer tunnel." The officer did not reveal the location but bragged "each opening in this [tunnel] measures 12 to 18 square meters, and has a mobile floor and a semi-mobile ceiling. Each four openings are connected by a passage that allows fighters to pass easily [from one opening] to the other."

Israel is not facing a ragtag band of Palestinian thugs. Nonetheless, one analyst, actually rejecting the Israeli claim of "self-defense," actually wrote, "The Gaza war is the confrontation of "a state and a networked organization," adding, "like the US Army fighting the Salvation Army."

In truth, this confrontation is yet another round of Israel versus Iran and its proxies. It is a lengthy war fought in the open in Gaza and Lebanon and fought in the shadows in attacks against Israeli and Jewish institutions in Buenos Aires, or against the weapons supply routes between Iran, Syria and Hezbollah, or in the assassination of a master terrorist in Damascus. In such a war, cease-fires can only be a temporary respite, at best, not a basis for peace.

Former Israeli diplomat Lenny Ben-David is an analyst and consultant on Israeli and Mideast affairs.

Monday 05 January 2009
Lenny Ben-David​
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
It's Hamas, stupid ...
Hamas shuns bid to give Rafah to PA

Hamas has rejected an Egyptian proposal to place the Rafah border crossing under forces loyal to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, Hamas officials said Wednesday.

Hamas also rejected an Egyptian proposal to deploy international troops in the Gaza Strip in the context of a new cease-fire agreement with Israel, the officials added.

The Egyptian proposals are backed by a number of Arab and EU countries, they said.

Hamas officials, meanwhile, continued to issue contradictory statements regarding their readiness to reach a new cease-fire with Israel.

Hamas leaders in Syria and Lebanon said they would not agree to a long-term truce because they wanted to "preserve the right to respond to Israeli violations and aggression."

But their colleagues in the Gaza Strip sounded more optimistic.

Ahmed Yussef, an adviser to Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh, said he did not rule out the possibility of reaching a cease-fire agreement "within 48 hours." He said Hamas would stop firing rockets at Israel once the IDF halted its military operation in the Gaza Strip.

Yussef added that any cease-fire agreement should include the reopening of the border crossings and an end to the blockade of the Gaza Strip.

In Cairo, Egyptian Intelligence Chief Gen. Omar Suleiman met with Hamas representatives to discuss the latest proposals and ways of ending the violence in the Gaza Strip.

Suleiman reportedly told the Hamas delegation - whose members included Imadal-Alami and Muhammad Nasser - that Egypt would not reopen the Rafah border crossing unless Abbas's forces were allowed to return to the terminal.

The border crossing fell into Hamas's hands after its operatives managed to kick Abbas's security force out of the area in the summer of 2007.

Suleiman also urged the Hamas delegation to agree to the presence of international troops in some areas of the Gaza Strip, warning that failure to comply would have "serious repercussions" on the region.

Suleiman and other Egyptian government officials expressed outrage over allegations made by some Hamas leaders to the effect that the Egyptians had given Israel a green light to attack the Gaza Strip.

Sources close to Hamas in the Gaza Strip expressed disappointment with the Egyptian stance. They said the Egyptians were behaving as if Hamas "were not a major player."

The sources said the Egyptians were still hoping that Abbas and former Fatah security chief Muhammad Dahlan would be able to regain control over the Gaza Strip.

Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum said his movement opposed the return of Abbas's loyalists to the border crossing in accordance with a US-brokered agreement reached in 2005. The accord also called for the deployment of international monitors at the terminal and allowed Israel to monitor the movement of Palestinian travelers.

Barhoum said the border crossing should be under the exclusive control of the Palestinians and Egyptians.

Osama Hamdan, Hamas's representative in Lebanon, said the idea of deploying international troops in the Gaza Strip was "aimed at protecting Israel."

Hamas's armed wing, Izzadin Kassam, also rejected the idea of deploying international troops in the Gaza Strip. It said Hamas would consider such troops a hostile and occupying force and would therefore launch attacks against them. [source]​
Hamas has but one precondition for truce: the unimpeded ability to employ terror in the service of the eradication of Israel.
 

Heneni

Miss Independent
Yeh....now that lebanon is involved. Who knows to what new lows this situation can sink to further.....:shrug:
 

England my lionheart

Rockerjahili Rebel
Premium Member
This could get much worse,if Israel retaliates or enters the Lebanon then Iran can get involved because of the security pact it has with the Lebanon.
This would be simmilar to Britain entering the war against Germany when they invaded Poland and i think that was the strategy all along for Iran to be in a conflict with Israel(hope i'm wrong)
 

England my lionheart

Rockerjahili Rebel
Premium Member
Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah has said that the 2006 conflict between Hezbollah and Israel would seem like a walk in the park compared to what will happen now,its all very worrying.
 

EiNsTeiN

Boo-h!
Hassan Nassarallah is a complete idiot!!

In the same time Israel and Hamas are studying the Franco- Egyptian proposal, he gets in and escalates the entire conflict in a stupid way!!...

Lets pray for the best!
 

Heneni

Miss Independent
Time to pray for the peace of jerusalem! Probalby because if there is no peace in jerusalem, there wont be peace anywhere else.

God help us...i think this situation can only lead to very irresponsible people, using very irresponsible methods to 'solve' this problem.
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
Hassan Nassarallah is a complete idiot!!

In the same time Israel and Hamas are studying the Franco- Egyptian proposal, he gets in and escalates the entire conflict in a stupid way!!...
Perhaps not ...
The army instructed citizens of the North to return to normalcy, saying that the attack was an isolated incident.

According to Northern Command assessments, the salvo was probably fired by Palestinian terror groups and not by Hizbullah, but the possibility that Hizbullah instructed another group to fire at Israel could not be ruled out.

"Nothing happens in Lebanon without a green light from Hizbullah," a defense official said. "Even if it was a Palestinian group who fired the rockets, Hizbullah would have to at least have turned a blind eye to allow the rocket fire."

Hizbullah denied involvement in the attack.

A Lebanese government official said the country was trying to determine who launched the rockets. The official also said Lebanon is committed to a UN-brokered truce that ended the Second Lebanon War in 2006.

An Al Jazeera reporter with close ties to Hizbullah said there was no chance the rockets were fired by the Shi'ite terror group, because the rockets were of an outdated model that Hizbullah had not used for years. Channel 10 also quoted him as saying that had Hizbullah wisheded to open a second front on Israel's North it would have fired dozens of rockets and not only three.

Shlomi Mayor Gabi Na'aman told Channel 10 that the municipality decided to cancel school studies on Thursday, but later in the day the Home Front Command allowed people to go to work and children to go to school throughout the western Galilee. [source]​
The Northern attack has the signature of a rogue operation from some Al Qaeda wannabe. I certainly hope that's the case ...
 

England my lionheart

Rockerjahili Rebel
Premium Member
Perhaps not ...
The army instructed citizens of the North to return to normalcy, saying that the attack was an isolated incident.

According to Northern Command assessments, the salvo was probably fired by Palestinian terror groups and not by Hizbullah, but the possibility that Hizbullah instructed another group to fire at Israel could not be ruled out.

"Nothing happens in Lebanon without a green light from Hizbullah," a defense official said. "Even if it was a Palestinian group who fired the rockets, Hizbullah would have to at least have turned a blind eye to allow the rocket fire."

Hizbullah denied involvement in the attack.

A Lebanese government official said the country was trying to determine who launched the rockets. The official also said Lebanon is committed to a UN-brokered truce that ended the Second Lebanon War in 2006.

An Al Jazeera reporter with close ties to Hizbullah said there was no chance the rockets were fired by the Shi'ite terror group, because the rockets were of an outdated model that Hizbullah had not used for years. Channel 10 also quoted him as saying that had Hizbullah wisheded to open a second front on Israel's North it would have fired dozens of rockets and not only three.

Shlomi Mayor Gabi Na'aman told Channel 10 that the municipality decided to cancel school studies on Thursday, but later in the day the Home Front Command allowed people to go to work and children to go to school throughout the western Galilee. [source]​
The Northern attack has the signature of a rogue operation from some Al Qaeda wannabe. I certainly hope that's the case ...
So do i
 

emiliano

Well-Known Member
This could get much worse,if Israel retaliates or enters the Lebanon then Iran can get involved because of the security pact it has with the Lebanon.
This would be simmilar to Britain entering the war against Germany when they invaded Poland and i think that was the strategy all along for Iran to be in a conflict with Israel(hope i'm wrong)

Yes it could, the Zionist can declare total war, and do away with the sub-humans, we can only hope that the rest of the world is spared the fury of the master race.
 

EiNsTeiN

Boo-h!
Perhaps not ...
The army instructed citizens of the North to return to normalcy, saying that the attack was an isolated incident.

According to Northern Command assessments, the salvo was probably fired by Palestinian terror groups and not by Hizbullah, but the possibility that Hizbullah instructed another group to fire at Israel could not be ruled out.

"Nothing happens in Lebanon without a green light from Hizbullah," a defense official said. "Even if it was a Palestinian group who fired the rockets, Hizbullah would have to at least have turned a blind eye to allow the rocket fire."

Hizbullah denied involvement in the attack.

A Lebanese government official said the country was trying to determine who launched the rockets. The official also said Lebanon is committed to a UN-brokered truce that ended the Second Lebanon War in 2006.

An Al Jazeera reporter with close ties to Hizbullah said there was no chance the rockets were fired by the Shi'ite terror group, because the rockets were of an outdated model that Hizbullah had not used for years. Channel 10 also quoted him as saying that had Hizbullah wisheded to open a second front on Israel's North it would have fired dozens of rockets and not only three.

Shlomi Mayor Gabi Na'aman told Channel 10 that the municipality decided to cancel school studies on Thursday, but later in the day the Home Front Command allowed people to go to work and children to go to school throughout the western Galilee. [source]
The Northern attack has the signature of a rogue operation from some Al Qaeda wannabe. I certainly hope that's the case ...
Hope so..
Well, as Hizbollah denied its responsibility, there is a great probability it was carried down by random groups..
Hope this is not the beginning of something!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top