How about Israel ending the oppression of Palestinians?I'm sure it will, and such will get squashed just the same. I don't have any solutions for such conflicts.
Or should that continue...& if so, why?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
How about Israel ending the oppression of Palestinians?I'm sure it will, and such will get squashed just the same. I don't have any solutions for such conflicts.
Hamas didn't just arise because they hate Jews, no more than places like Iran calling America the Great Satan because they hate America. The PIRA did not arise because they hated the English.The cure
Hamas should stop behaving in a hateful way.
Hatred is never fully justified. It is just a particular version of history.
How about Hamas not use stupid violence tactics - given they must know what they would get in return and martyrdom is fine when the people being martyred have signed up for this?How about Israel ending the oppression of Palestinians?
Or should that continue...& if so, why?
Whatever, the way forward isn't for Hamas to provoke Israel like they have done - so as to probably make the situation much worse. Given that such is just being cynical towards those Hamas is supposed to be responsible for - making it worse for them than better.Hamas didn't just arise because they hate Jews, no more than places like Iran calling America the Great Satan because they hate America. The PIRA did not arise because they hated the English.
It is a fact Israel has forced Palestinians into uncomfortably cramped and small territories, Israel is known for killing those who are regular not supposed to be targeted (like children, journalists and aid workers) when they attack, amd they have admited to economically repressing the Palestinians. We have seen this so many, many times throughout history and those in the position of the Palestinians frequently fight back against their reoressors. But what we see so many doing with Israel is no different than defending Rome and calling them the victims for getting raided, attacked, and the city itself sacked a few times by "barbarians," but leaving out those "barbarians" were people who were being militarily dominated, economically repressed, enslaved and slaughtered and made to live in fear. We call them barbarians but the history books rarely acknowledge Rome militarized many peoples as a response to Rome (such as the Gauls).
But America likes Empires and military might, amd it loves it's White Jesus and being the big daddy protector and defender of his personally hand picked and chosen people (an extremely problematic concept to begin with the assumption of divine superiority). It hates victims, loves the strong, and holds firm in its erroneous belief that whatever happens to you is your own fault. We can't even kill off the atrocious and heinous belief that bullying is a right of passage that needs to happen so it's no surprise so many Americans are defending god's own militarily pumped bullies.
The oppressed, being relatively weaker will be bothHow about Hamas not use stupid violence tactics - given they must know what they would get in return and martyrdom is fine when the people being martyred have signed up for this?
Alas, because Israel continued oppressing PalestiniansWhatever, the way forward isn't for Hamas to provoke Israel like they have done - so as to probably make the situation much worse.
You focus upon what is terrible about Hamas.Given that such is just being cynical towards those Hamas is supposed to be responsible for - making it worse for them than better.
If you believe so then fine, but I doubt the solution is likely to come from Israel alone. Given that I doubt any other nation would not have responded as Israel has done if they had such capacity. So still laid at Hamas as the decision makers in this instance - as they weren't forced to do this.The oppressed, being relatively weaker will be both
angry & restricted to using unconventional warfare.
I'm not saying it's right....or always wrong.
But it is an inexorable consequence of oppression,
eg, Indians here massacred settlers, slaves revolted
against the slavers. The oppression had to end for
peace to reign.
Alas, because Israel continued oppressing Palestinians
even when Hamas wasn't attacking on this vastly
increased hideous scale, Hamas was inspired to
respond as they did. This should be a wake up call
to Israel that their standard policy of oppression
is failing & will continue to fail.
You focus upon what is terrible about Hamas.
No solution will be found there.
Israel is the only country with the power to end
the oppression, but it chooses only to increase it.
No, it will require a sea change in US foreign policy,If you believe so then fine, but I doubt the solution is likely to come from Israel alone.
You don't address Israel's decisions to keepGiven that I doubt any other nation would not have responded as Israel has done if they had such capacity. So still laid at Hamas as the decision makers in this instance - as they weren't forced to do this.
Works both ways that - given how Hamas apparently see Jews and Israel as a whole.No, it will require a sea change in US foreign policy,
ie, holding Israel accountable if it's to continue
receiving massive financial & military support.
I don't think Israel is culturally able on its own to
see Palestinians as worthy of equal human rights.
How could I, given I'm no expert on such, but situations don't generally arise from the actions of one party alone.You don't address Israel's decisions to keep
Palestinians oppressed politically & economically.
Giving Israel tacit permission, & even financial
subsidy to do that is harming not just Palestinians,
but also Israel.
Your drivel is becoming increasingly noxious -- so many pathetically inane assertions, yet no demand that the Hamas release the hostages.
*Mod edit*
How about Israel not ignore the historical reality that what they are doing is creating their own worst enemy (a bad trait they learned from Uncle Sam, maybe?)?How about Hamas not use stupid violence tactics - given they must know what they would get in return and martyrdom is fine when the people being martyred have signed up for this?
Israel has committed war crimes of their own volition. What they are doing is not self defense, it is not an act against Hamas. They are the punishing the Palestinians for existing and living under a sham of a government that so very many of them did not vote for.Whatever, the way forward isn't for Hamas to provoke Israel like they have done - so as to probably make the situation much worse.
That is entirely on Israel. There is absolutely no reason for their bombing and killing of civilians as they have, no reason for blocking the entry of necessary supplies, and absolutely no damn reason to make regular Palestinians suffer as they have.Given that such is just being cynical towards those Hamas is supposed to be responsible for - making it worse for them than better.
Primary responsibility lies with the more powerfulWorks both ways that - given how Hamas apparently see Jews and Israel as a whole.
To weigh in on one side doesHow could I, given I'm no expert on such, but situations don't generally arise from the actions of one party alone.
I'm in no position to answer much of this, and I suspect that most of us aren't. As to the hostages, well as in all cases of such blackmail, it is usually advisory to never negotiate - given such just encourages this kind of action - but we know that often negotiation does occur behind the scenes. I just wonder how many Palestinians might think themselves at all responsible for what Hamas did and/or the reply from Israel.
It would probably be very difficult to sift this out if it's there, but I wonder to what extent, if any, that more general and at large resentment amd hatred towards the poor and less fortunate play into this mentality that throws a blanket of guilt over all Palestinians.Primary responsibility lies with the more powerful
party to the hostility...the one doing the oppressing,
& that is Israel. It could unilaterally decide to achieve
peace. Palestinians, an unorganized group of victims,
lack that unity & ability (ie, they're not the ones doing
the oppressing).
Do you have any idea what it is?Antisemitism has a history in Islamist thought that goes back long before the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza or occupation of the West Bank or even the founding of the state of Israel. So it's obvious that more motivates their hatred than just the modern situation since 1967 or 2005.
You do have a point.The cure
Hamas should stop behaving in a hateful way.
Hatred is never fully justified. It is just a particular version of history.
I don't begrudge desperate people who might'veIt would probably be very difficult to sift this out if it's there, but I wonder to what extent, if any, that more general and at large resentment amd hatred towards the poor and less fortunate play into this mentality that throws a blanket of guilt over all Palestinians.
We can definitely say for sure however it is unworthy of consideration for so many that most Palestinians, not even those in Gaza, then or now, voted for Hamas.
Do you have any idea what it is?
It sure is not that a Jew follows the commandments and does what is right by choice.
So what would be the cause of people having such a problem?
ps....
Se·mit·ic
- relating to or denoting a family of languages that includes Hebrew, Arabic, and Aramaic and certain ancient languages such as Phoenician and Akkadian, constituting the main subgroup of the Afro-Asiatic family.
2. relating to the peoples who speak Semitic languages, especially Hebrew and Arabic.
Be nice if people would fix the problem and use of the term semitic.
If people were given straight answers there would be less confusion.It would be nice if you would stop trying to pedantically nitpick word choice when you (should) know what's being said.
You're correct about the word's application.It would be nice if you would stop trying to pedantically nitpick word choice when you (should) know what's being said.
Both of us know that Hamas is not capable of mounting another sneak attack, because the IDF has now established an impenetrable perimeter,
and all Hamas has been able to do is launch their homemade rockets, most of which are wiped out by Iron Dome. Moreover, Israel had been experiencing such attacks daily before October 7, so, if Israel had no immediate or compelling need to use such lethal force then, it doesn't now.
Of course not, but what was the rush to kill thousands of Palestinian civilians and put the hostages at risk?
If Israel had acted with greater restraint, thousands of lives would have been saved. What they have now is a humanitarian catastrophe and a world that does not share the desire of the Israeli government to mete out revenge against not just Hamas, but the entire population of one of the most densely populated ethnic ghettoes in the world.
Worse yet, the Netanyahu government created the conditions for the attack by strengthening Hamas in order to weaken the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank so that it could establish more illegal Israeli settlements there. The PA itself had rejected the kind of terrorist tactics that Hamas used on October 7 and had not ever rejected. The Palestinians did not vote to keep Hamas in power, but Israelis did vote for governments whose policy was to keep Hamas in power to help with its West Bank settlements policy.
I don't think you are paying attention at all. Nobody expects Hamas to act responsibly, and everyone expects Israel, as a civilized nation, to do so. All supplies must be constantly brought in from the outside.
Just give it some thought. What were conditions like at the border when Hamas attacked on October 7? What are they like now? What kind of military force to you think Hamas has to throw at the IDF, the best trained and equipped military in the entire region? Israel is within its rights to disable and destroy Hamas, but it has a responsibility to do so in a way that protects civilians living there who are not part of the Hamas terrorist organization.
Did you read that article? The IDF blew a huge crater in the densely populated Jabalya neighborhood to kill just one Hamas leader, and it isn't clear that they even got him. They did, however, get a lot of children along with adult civilians. They have also attacked ambulances, claiming they are being used by Hamas. (And how did they know? Anonymous tip from people who didn't tip them off about October 7?) Read the news and IDF explanations for their actions, and then see if what they are doing sounds like what your article describes. It looks like the opposite to me.
Stop digging. The hole is deep enough as it is, and they have retrieved very few of the Oct 7 hostages. They've already taken more lives than the Hamas terrorists did.
A pause in the killing and perhaps some reflection would help Israel to come up with a better solution, especially with the help of those who support it. Israel has already made the mistake of creating the massive Gaza Strip ghetto and actually allowing Hamas to build itself up there.
Now it is paying a very dear cost for that, and the person responsible for that policy is still running the country. He isn't the best person to solve the problem he created, but the Knesset was elected by the Israeli public, and Netanyahu was the winner. The solution won't happen quickly, but what is the rush to blow up Gaza neighborhoods? Israel needs to change its tactics and become more methodical at rooting out Hamas. Personally, I think that Israel should try to bring in peacekeeping troops to supply aid and help prevent a resumption of hostilities. UN troops would be ideal, but I'm not sure that is feasible, given the demonization of the UN by Israel.