McBell
Unbound
To present your asked for examples is a blatant violation of rule one.Do you have any examples at all of any Jews calling someone an anti-Semite here on RF?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
To present your asked for examples is a blatant violation of rule one.Do you have any examples at all of any Jews calling someone an anti-Semite here on RF?
To present your asked for examples is a blatant violation of rule one.
Nonsense! All that would be necessary would be to reproduce the putative examples as posted by the party in question.To present your asked for examples is a blatant violation of rule one.
You want names of RF member Jews who have made the accusation of anti-semitism. Post #181Nonsense! All that would be necessary would be to reproduce the putative examples as posted by the party in question.
No, not at all. It would merely be quoting posts from others. Which is clearly no violation whatsoever.You want names of RF member Jews who have made the accusation of anti-semitism. Post #181
The presenting of said list is a rule violation.
It is against forum rules to quote another members post in a thread outside the thread it was originally posted in without the original posters permission.No, not at all. It would merely be quoting posts from others. Which is clearly no violation whatsoever.
So the government didn’t give the settlers weapons?
I never asked him to do this.It is against forum rules to quote another members post in a thread outside the thread it was originally posted in without the original posters permission.
Yes, you did:I never asked him to do this.
Do you have any examples at all of any Jews calling someone an anti-Semite here on RF?
Wrote that guy that can't produce the names of any Jews that have called him an anti-semite despite claiming they were many.
Nonsense! All that would be necessary would be to reproduce the putative examples as posted by the party in question.
I refuse to post their names.Wrote that guy that can't produce the names of any....
No, I never asked him to produce quotes without the original posters permission. That is what I replied to. You are attempting to put words in my mouth but taking quotes of me out of context. I asked him to produce quotes but never asked him to do it in a manner contrary to forum rules. Re read post 189, it is quite clear what I was referring to.Yes, you did:
It could be done without violating forum rules. Furthermore you have an alternative. Simple post the name of the threads in which you think this was done without naming any poster by name. That would be no violation of any rule. But you won't be able to do it. Because you don't really have any such examples.I refuse to post their names.
Aside from the fact that this would violate
the rule against calling out other posters,
your disbelief that they did & do this
would remain. Your posts are transparent.
Fete Israel & God's Chosen.
Support the murder of Palestinians.
And taking their land for Zionist conquest.
I've no reason to sate your thirstIt could be done without violating forum rules.
In this point I agree you are right.No, I never asked him to produce quotes without the original posters permission. That is what I replied to. You are attempting to put words in my mouth but taking quotes of me out of context. I asked him to produce quotes but never asked him to do it in a manner contrary to forum rules. Re read post 189, it is quite clear what I was referring to.
Why succumb to specious requests?In this point I agree you are right.
Besides which I believe it would be perfectly ok to refer to a thread by name and a post by number. That is not quoting.
That's your questions not mine. This back and forth is off the thread OP anyway which is to what degree Israel's tactics are counter productive.Why succumb to specious requests?
Why rub another poster's nose in their bigotry?
Do you believe it would be useful?
That seems the poster's goal.This back and forth is off the thread OP anyway....
The reason you need to provide the evidence is the onus to support your own assertion. You haven't done so even though it has been pointed out that a search of RF postings doesn't support it.I've no reason to sate your thirst
for information you'd reject anyway.
I've no need to justify anything to you.The reason you need to provide the evidence is the onus to support your own assertion.
You told them to present names and posts of people who said those things. You clearly did not think permission was necessary.No, I never asked him to produce quotes without the original posters permission.
I get it. You asked someone to do something that is not within the forum rules, but because you didn't explicitly SAY to break forum rules you're in the clear.I asked him to produce quotes but never asked him to do it in a manner contrary to forum rules.