• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Israel is losing militarily and politically

McBell

Unbound
Nonsense! All that would be necessary would be to reproduce the putative examples as posted by the party in question.
You want names of RF member Jews who have made the accusation of anti-semitism. Post #181
The presenting of said list is a rule violation.
 

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
You want names of RF member Jews who have made the accusation of anti-semitism. Post #181
The presenting of said list is a rule violation.
No, not at all. It would merely be quoting posts from others. Which is clearly no violation whatsoever.
 

McBell

Unbound
No, not at all. It would merely be quoting posts from others. Which is clearly no violation whatsoever.
It is against forum rules to quote another members post in a thread outside the thread it was originally posted in without the original posters permission.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
So the government didn’t give the settlers weapons?

I don't know where the settlers got their guns, but either way I don't support the vigilantism some of them are doing.

Do you support what Hamas did on 10-7? Did you support the cheering of their accomplishment in Gaza and throughout much of the Muslem world?
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
I never asked him to do this.
Yes, you did:

Do you have any examples at all of any Jews calling someone an anti-Semite here on RF?
Wrote that guy that can't produce the names of any Jews that have called him an anti-semite despite claiming they were many.
Nonsense! All that would be necessary would be to reproduce the putative examples as posted by the party in question.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Wrote that guy that can't produce the names of any....
I refuse to post their names.
Aside from the fact that this would violate
the rule against calling out other posters,
your disbelief that they did & do this
would remain. Your posts are transparent.
Fete Israel & God's Chosen.
Support the murder of Palestinians.
And taking their land for Zionist conquest.
 

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Yes, you did:
No, I never asked him to produce quotes without the original posters permission. That is what I replied to. You are attempting to put words in my mouth but taking quotes of me out of context. I asked him to produce quotes but never asked him to do it in a manner contrary to forum rules. Re read post 189, it is quite clear what I was referring to.
 

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I refuse to post their names.
Aside from the fact that this would violate
the rule against calling out other posters,
your disbelief that they did & do this
would remain. Your posts are transparent.
Fete Israel & God's Chosen.
Support the murder of Palestinians.
And taking their land for Zionist conquest.
It could be done without violating forum rules. Furthermore you have an alternative. Simple post the name of the threads in which you think this was done without naming any poster by name. That would be no violation of any rule. But you won't be able to do it. Because you don't really have any such examples.
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
No, I never asked him to produce quotes without the original posters permission. That is what I replied to. You are attempting to put words in my mouth but taking quotes of me out of context. I asked him to produce quotes but never asked him to do it in a manner contrary to forum rules. Re read post 189, it is quite clear what I was referring to.
In this point I agree you are right.

Besides which I believe it would be perfectly ok to refer to a thread by name and a post by number. That is not quoting.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
In this point I agree you are right.

Besides which I believe it would be perfectly ok to refer to a thread by name and a post by number. That is not quoting.
Why succumb to specious requests?
Why rub another poster's nose in their bigotry?
Do you believe it would be useful?
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
Why succumb to specious requests?
Why rub another poster's nose in their bigotry?
Do you believe it would be useful?
That's your questions not mine. This back and forth is off the thread OP anyway which is to what degree Israel's tactics are counter productive.
 

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I've no reason to sate your thirst
for information you'd reject anyway.
The reason you need to provide the evidence is the onus to support your own assertion. You haven't done so even though it has been pointed out that a search of RF postings doesn't support it.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
The reason you need to provide the evidence is the onus to support your own assertion.
I've no need to justify anything to you.
Since you keep pushing the matter, I'll
be more candid.
Your posts betray murderous bigotry, blind
loyalty to Israel, no humanity for Muslims.
Your opinion of me is utterly irrelevant.
Those who disgust me deserve nothing.
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
No, I never asked him to produce quotes without the original posters permission.
You told them to present names and posts of people who said those things. You clearly did not think permission was necessary.

I asked him to produce quotes but never asked him to do it in a manner contrary to forum rules.
I get it. You asked someone to do something that is not within the forum rules, but because you didn't explicitly SAY to break forum rules you're in the clear.

Gotcha. Very clever.
 
Top