SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
You brought it up. I countered your arguments. Now you're copping out.Abortion is not the topic of this thread.
I am for abortion...so please...let us remain on topic.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You brought it up. I countered your arguments. Now you're copping out.Abortion is not the topic of this thread.
I am for abortion...so please...let us remain on topic.
It wasn't me who brought it up. Read the previous posts.You brought it up. I countered your arguments. Now you're copping out.
No, he is not. He is a normal guy. He is an actor.Perhaps. Or perhaps Brad Pitt is a sexual predator. Or can't control his temper. I don't know. Just being an attractive person doesn't make you a good person.
That just ignores everything what I said. In America a bear encountered in the wild most likely won't be an issue and will leave you alone as long as you leave them alone. They tend to be more curious than anything and don't want the trouble. Food, a mate or especially cubs can be bad news for everything thats not the bear, but other than that it's not likely to attack.Bears are dangerous and unpredictable. Bear kills runner in northern Italy - General News - Ansa.it
You can try to reason with a man. And calm him down.
You cannot communicate with a bear.
You certainly won't be able to reason with a strange bear.That just ignores everything what I said. In America a bear encountered in the wild most likely won't be an issue and will leave you alone as long as you leave them alone. They tend to be more curious than anything and don't want the trouble. Food, a mate or especially cubs can be bad news for everything thats not the bear, but other than that it's not likely to attack.
A strange man, however, you may not be able to communicate or reason with him either.
So are you saying that if I meet Leonardo Di Caprio, alone in the woods, there is a chance he will rape me?That just ignores everything what I said. In America a bear encountered in the wild most likely won't be an issue and will leave you alone as long as you leave them alone. They tend to be more curious than anything and don't want the trouble. Food, a mate or especially cubs can be bad news for everything thats not the bear, but other than that it's not likely to attack.
A strange man, however, you may not be able to communicate or reason with him either.
There's also a chance that Barack Obama would rape you.So are you saying that if I meet Leonardo Di Caprio, alone in the woods, there is a chance he will rape me?
...and if they are highly territorial and you invade their territory.Bears kill people out of hunger, being startled, & getting
near food or cubs.
The entire debate I see it like people who warn about how dangerous dogs are but never consider we humans are vastly more dangerous towards each other than any dog.You certainly won't be able to reason with a strange bear.
It's stupid to fear men simply because of the remote
possibility that the one you meet might have ill intent.
Bears kill people out of hunger, being startled, & getting
near food or cubs.
Would you argue that black men should be feared?
I prefer Leo, honestly.There's also a chance that Barack Obama would rape you.
You told me that abortions have nothing to do with rape.It wasn't me who brought it up. Read the previous posts.
How do you know this? Have you met the guy? Subjected him to a psychiatric evaluation? Maybe he's a serial killer.No, he is not. He is a normal guy. He is an actor.
Okay...let's change the question.You told me that abortions have nothing to do with rape.
How do you know this? Have you met the guy? Subjected him to a psychiatric evaluation? Maybe he's a serial killer.
Prejudice against dogs doesn't poseThe entire debate I see it like people who warn about how dangerous dogs are but never consider we humans are vastly more dangerous towards each other than any dog.
That fails if you unknowinglyI'll go you a step further, I'd rather encounter a rattlesnake in the wild than a human. At least the snake warns and my hearing is good enough to hear, and I know to stay calm and slowly back away, and wearing baggy pants as I do also helps.
Women who fear all men, & wouldThe human? Is it a hippy wanting to share a joint or the next Zodiac Killer? Probably somewhere between those two.
I prefer Leo too. Had a crush on him since I was 12.I prefer Leo, honestly.
No offense for the former president.
It's not a phobia.Women who fear all men, & would
rather encounter a dangerous animal
in the woods need counseling to get
over this debilitating phobia.
The choice speaks for itself.It's not a phobia.
If they're only saying it for the purposeAs the author says in her article, it's cultural programming. Or in other words, a trend created artificially.
Even if a woman is straight, she has to says that men are scary a priori. To be socially accepted.
The most disturbing und unsettling murder I can think of is the Scazzi case.The choice speaks for itself.
If they're only saying it for the purpose
of painting all men as dangerous, then
it is indeed something other than a phobia.
It would be hystrionics.
It's not a phobia. It is a fact humans, particularly men, are the top danger and threat to humans. Other animals even tend to try to avoid humans.Women who fear all men, & would
rather encounter a dangerous animal
in the woods need counseling to get
over this debilitating phobia.
I wouldn't want to meet her in the woods.The most disturbing und unsettling murder I can think of is the Scazzi case.
A 15 year old girl named Sarah went to visit her cousin .
Her cousin Sabrina strangled her to death in an act of rage due to jealousy.
Especially, black men, according to statistics.It's not a phobia. It is a fact humans, particularly men, are the top danger and threat to humans.