-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Its not euthanasia, its suicide.
- Thread starter Twilight Hue
- Start date
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Good news. The woman will live then!
I agree. Medication is way over pushed and they don’t have it figured out as much as they claim to. It makes me even more iffy to let them decide “it’s hopeless for you, maybe suicide is the answer for you” to physically healthy 28 year olds especially
Last edited:
EconGuy
Active Member
Quite right.
I tell people, mostly younger, that if you want to know the truth of something, evaluate the evidence against it as it only takes a single pieces of evidence to prove something wrong, but thousands or millions of pieces to prove it right.
As far as academics, or more importantly, experts, of course they can be wrong, the important thing is that they get closer to the truth as time goes on.
Kathryn
It was on fire when I laid down on it.
She's not the first person they've cleared for euthanasia physically healthy and in her twenties, either.
It disturbs me that people are on board with these. I wonder how many souls could’ve been saved. This isn’t like abortion, we’re not losing a fetus that was unborn. This is literally destroying a life that already exists.
Kathryn
It was on fire when I laid down on it.
I agree. I wonder what's next?
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
It is shocking the conditions now accepted for euthanasia and suicide.
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
Nobody did that.
If this happened, then the doctors would be charged with murder.
You might want to read up on euthanasia laws in the country in question.
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
You don't even know what these conditions were exactly nor to what extent.
Your entire opinion is based on a single sentence with 3 vague terms. You seem to think this can accurately reflect YEARS of treatment and a medical file of hundreds of pages thick. And somehow you think you can then offer some kind of qualified opinion on the matter.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Probably the ongoing argument that anorexia is a terminal illness justifying euthanasia.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
She is not terminally ill either.
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
Which isn't relevant, as said many times already.
Euthanasia laws don't require the patient to be "terminal".
I did exaggerate, but that's essentially what they're saying by assisting in her suicide. She is telling them she wants to commit suicide, and they are agreeing to it.
It would be good to know what their criteria is here, and how exactly they passed her for euthanasia.
Kathryn
It was on fire when I laid down on it.
Don't talk to me about brain disorders - I know a lot about them already.
Do people realize that they can say no to a med that a doctor is offering?
I do all the time.
Or even just take it for a few weeks and stop if it's not working or has side effects one does not like.
So what
So what? It's still this person's choice to do so.