Ignatius A
Well-Known Member
As I said we live in a culture of death.To some of us, quality of life counts for something.
And dying with dignity on one's own terms.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
As I said we live in a culture of death.To some of us, quality of life counts for something.
And dying with dignity on one's own terms.
Allowing your patient to kill themselves doesn't minimize suffering, but creates even more.Perhaps they view their duty of care as involving the minimisation of suffering and also maybe respecting the wishes of people to make their own choices within law.
My preference is that she not die at all, as she doesn't need to! Suicide is suicide, and I'm not going to play the game of making some methods seem "nicer" or more romantic than others. That's really quite gross.Would you prefer she does it with a rope or a bag of painkillers?
Because any doctor that tells a depressed patient there's nothing more that can be done (i.e. there's no hope and you'll never recover) is simply lying and giving up on their patient. With mental illness, there's always hope for recovery - as long as you still live! Anyone who has spent much time interacting with the mental healthcare system can tell you that that attitude is not rare. It's not rare with other kinds of healthcare, either.How do you know this? The article doesn't detail her treatment history and the discussions she has had with doctors/counsellors etc.
The article implies her doctors have somehow coerced her into this but there's no quotation from the women saying anything like this.
Huh?As I said we live in a culture of death.
I do know enough to discern between terminal and chronic.I don't know if it is a failure or not. I know nothing about this case. Neither do any of you who all are VERY QUICK with your judgements.
I haven't said anything at all about me thinking it is or is not a failure.
What is bizarre is how quick the lot of you are to judge this thing while knowing literally nothing about it.
What I do know is that euthanasia isn't taken lightly. Not in the Netherlands and not in Belgium. What I do know is that there's a whole procedure before the proceedings are cleared and I also know this procedure is quite detailed and has quite strict criteria. I happen to personally knew somebody who went through it. It took 8 months and plenty of interviews and examinations and second and third opinions and hearings and.... on and on. I have no reason at all to doubt that this procedure wasn't properly followed. To call it a "failure", imo anyways, would mean that this procedure wasn't properly followed in this particular case.
It certainly could be the case that it wasn't properly followed, but at present I have seen no indication whatsoever that it wasn't. Neither does the article mention such at all.
So yeah.... not quite sure what else to say here.
As I said to @Saint Frankenstein : all I have done here is point out to people who quicly they jumped on the judgemental band wagon, calling the doctors "failures" and insulting both the patient and her mom, claiming medical malpractice and what-not.... while knowing literally nothing about the case.
Where did you get your medical degree?I do know enough to discern between terminal and chronic.
This is a chronic condition, not a terminal one. Making this a bonofide suicide and not euthanasia.
Do you need a medical degree to tell when someone has committed suicide?Where did you get your medical degree?
When did you talk with her?
When did you review her medical records?
You're confused? Why?Huh?
This was in response to, "To some of us, quality of life counts for something.
And dying with dignity on one's own terms."
Are you saying that quality of life and dying with some dignity are examples of a "culture of death?" How so?
Perhaps if you answered my question ....You're confused? Why?
That's a completely different topic of discussion. We're talking about quality of life of a person considering euthanasia.You have never heard people say they should be free to abort babies because having a baby would affect their quality of life? Or that the baby would have to grow up in a bad situation.
It's got a lot to do with euthanasia and it's availability. Especially for those with terminal illnesses who are suffering and would like to die with some dignity.Dying with dignity isnt the same as suicide and euthanasia
You don't like the answer. Not the same at allPerhaps if you answered my question ....
That's a completely different topic of discussion. We're talking about quality of life of a person considering euthanasia.
It's got a lot to do with euthanasia and it's availability.
My question was, "Are you saying that quality of life and dying with some dignity are examples of a "culture of death?" How so?"You don't like the answer. Not the same at all
So you have heard the "quality of life" argument for killing babies you just want to pretend it's a different rationale. It's the same reason to the same end.
You don't need nor require any degree to see poor medicine in action. Doctors are not the only ones who have a brain you know.Where did you get your medical degree?
When did you talk with her?
When did you review her medical records?
Some people simply cannot think for themselves what is good or bad without appealing to a professional in their mind to make a decision for them.Do you need a medical degree to tell when someone has committed suicide?
Does that sound reasonable, really?
Sometimes loved ones would be incredibly relieved to not have to watch their loved one spend the rest of their days in total misery.If people want to do that, then it's their business. It's sad, it sucks, it hurts their loved ones, but its still their choice.
So if one of my relatives is severely depressed, do I suggest suicide?Sometimes loved ones would be incredibly relieved to not have to watch their loved one spend the rest of their days in total misery.
I think one of its main issues is that by nature it only targets mentally ill people and people with physical disabilities. It seems borderline eugenicist to me to suggest that if these people can't find help or can't seem to fit into society one way or the other, they are free to do away with themselves. It will see a whole lot of these people killing themselves. In that way it seems worse than forced sterilisation or asylum imprisonment, because they are apparently making the decision themselves after being told there's nothing more to be done.Not a doctor but I think that 'There’s nothing more we can do for you. It’s never gonna get any better' indicates malpractice.
Doctors are not oracles.
On the other hand, I am not against MAID and think there is a solid argument that it saves lives in Canada because it requires patients to exhaust treatment methods that many would not consider or bother with if they felt they needed to take matters into their own hands.
Not that I am aware.Do you need a medical degree to tell when someone has committed suicide?
Does that sound reasonable, really?
The case at hand is very clear.Not that I am aware.
Now all you needs do is tie your question to the context of the post you quoted.
You know, that someone is making all manner of claims based absolutely no information concerning the case at hand.
You are making all manner of claims about her, her doctors, her mother, the council, etc. with absolutely no information.You don't need nor require any degree to see poor medicine in action. Doctors are not the only ones who have a brain you know.
Not really, but do go on....The case at hand is very clear.
Yes.A young woman wants to kill herself and the state is going to help her.
And?She has no terminal illness, is not facing end of life care, and is in a relationship.
Ah.That's all I need to know.