• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Jesus is a Fictional Character

No. But you made a point by not checking to see for yourself if I am correct. Which I am.
Which you’re not correct in you assumption that Paul was lying. Whether or not the snake was poisonous, the people who lived there seem to think it was. I really am not sure what your point is.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
Which you’re not correct in you assumption that Paul was lying. Whether or not the snake was poisonous, the people who lived there seem to think it was. I really am not sure what your point is.

Really? The story says " viper".

You figure that is true, or false?
Be sure to say if you think its true.

It was harmless snake, if there wss even a snake at all. Once one part of the story
is a lie, some of us get real suspicious about the rest of it.

If there was a snake-
Paul uses it to trick ignorant and
superstitious people into thinking he is under
"God's" protection.
What a shabby fraud.
 
Really? The story says " viper".

You figure that is true, or false?
Be sure to say if you think its true.

It was harmless snake, if there wss even a snake at all. Once one part of the story
is a lie, some of us get real suspicious about the rest of it.

If there was a snake-
Paul uses it to trick ignorant and
superstitious people into thinking he is under
"God's" protection.
What a shabby fraud.
Read Acts 27
 
If there was a snake-
Paul uses it to trick ignorant and
superstitious people into thinking he is under
"God's" protection.
What a shabby fraud.
You say Paul was a fraud, yet if you knew him, his ministry, how he lived, what he did, how God worked through him you’d be ashamed and embarrassed at your comment.
 

oldbadger

Skanky Old Mongrel!
Perhaps you should use a real word or
explain what you mean by " myther".
So you cannot figure out what a myther is,?
OK. That word has been used on RF for ten years at least. I read it first in 'outhouse's' posts, meaning folks who just call everything in the NT or Bible myths. = Mythers.
I began to call them miffers, a kind of English slang, but that could really have thrown you, maybe.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
You say Paul was a fraud, yet if you knew him, his ministry, how he lived, what he did, how God worked through him you’d be ashamed and embarrassed at your comment.

First - you dont know. You just have an
opinion.
I am analyzing a story for credibility- something you seem unwilling to do. Why?

Either stay on topic, or drop it, please?

These are no vipers, no dangerous snakes in Malta.
Can you accept that? If not this goes off into
stubborn unreason.

A yes or no on the " vipers" will do.
Are there vipers on Malta?
 
First - you dont know. You just have an
opinion.
I am analyzing a story for credibility- something you seem unwilling to do. Why?

Either stay on topic, or drop it, please?

These are no vipers, no dangerous snakes in Malta.
Can you accept that? If not this goes off into
stubborn unreason.

A yes or no on the " vipers" will do.
Are there vipers on Malta?
The topic is Paul, his character and motives is it not? Apparently on Malta approximately 2000 years ago there were vipers at least the one that latched onto Paul.
 
Last edited:
I am analyzing a story for credibility- something you seem unwilling to do. Why?
You’re analyzing the story but not the context, Paul’s letters, how he lived, how God used him, what the other apostles thought of him. By the way, sounds to me that Luke wrote Acts.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
You’re analyzing the story but not the context, Paul’s letters, how he lived, how God used him, what the other apostles thought of him. By the way, sounds to me that Luke wrote Acts.

Oh, the context is, it was ok to make things up.

God needed a fake story so he can " use" paul?

I understand it was all about how he
was "special". Dont assume i dont know gospel.
Satan does too. :D

If he had been special they wouldnt need to fake it.

This stuff is very simple.

Yes / no on him being bitten by a viper where
there arent any
 

lukethethird

unknown member
Stop you right there!
Most people I debate with are believers in Christianity!
I don't have to debate with many mythers and they are easy meat by comparison.

There are many theories as to what or who Jesus was,
the difference between you and I is that you have picked one and choose to defend it against any criticism. How noble of you.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
That story from Acts was written in the second century by an anonymous gospel writer, Paul died by the year 70CE and never mentioned it.

Ah, so somebody else made the story up.
Either way its a distinction sans difference,
as far as credibility of the accounts about
Paul are concerned.
A lot of that make - stuff- up goes around, like the " fact" that there ever were vipers on Malta,
and that they "latch on", or "cling" when they bite.
They dont. The strike is so quick you dont even
see the bite.
 

lukethethird

unknown member
Ah, so somebody else made the story up.
Either way its a distinction sans difference,
as far as credibility of the accounts about
Paul are concerned.
A lot of that make - stuff- up goes around, like the " fact" that there ever were vipers on Malta,
and that they "latch on", or "cling" when they bite.
They dont. The strike is so quick you dont even
see the bite.
Acts is full of stories that illustrate how true believers are protected from such things.
In Acts, James and John are taken as prisoners but an angel of the Lord swooped into the prison and freed John. Meanwhile, James was executed by the sword, the moral of the story is that followers of John's are better protected than James's.
 
Last edited:
Top