• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Jesus is a Fictional Character

Clara Tea

Well-Known Member
Supposedly the Messiah was going to be a human warrior that punished Israel's enemies. That's not Jesus.

President W. Bush just attacked Iraq and Afghanistan, and made torture camps around the world (including Guantanamo). So, the Religious Right, that put W. Bush in power, did punish enemies of Israel.
 
Jesus was god though. The Messiah is a purely human character.
Jesus is God the Son and will ask you the same question Jesus asked the Pharisee’s about 2000 years ago.
““What do you think about the Messiah? Whose son is he?” They replied, “David’s.” He asked them, “How is it then that David, inspired by the Spirit, calls him ‘Lord’: The Lord declared to my Lord, ‘Sit at my right hand until I put your enemies under your feet’? “If David calls him ‘Lord,’ how, then, can he be his son?””
‭‭Matthew‬ ‭22:42-45‬ ‭CSB‬‬
 

lukethethird

unknown member
History gets murky as we peer into its depths.

I suppose that we could apply the laws of probability to the issues, much as quantum mechanics derives meaning from random variables.
Religion requires that you believe, so don't be getting any ideas.
 

blü 2

Veteran Member
Premium Member
That would certainly explain aversion to bacon.

When I was getting my degrees in philosophy, we learned that Socrates never wrote anything. But, Plato, his student, wrote most that we know of him.
Not only that, but Plato was a playwright, so whatever Socrates actually said is going to sound better when Plato's written it up, and of course it's no secret that Socrates is given the lead role in some of Plato's later write-ups of his own views.
Comparisons of Bacon's work and Shakespeare's work clearly reveals that Shakespeare copied.
I like the theory that Shakespeare didn't write those plays, another guy with the same name did.
 
That's right, and I sure don't know of any 1st century history that refers to an historical Jesus and never claimed to.
I do, maybe go to Israel and check it out. Funny how much people don’t know in 2022. All of the sudden history is gone. Dead Sea scrolls was a good find. Also the Bible.
 
Last edited:

RestlessSoul

Well-Known Member
I don't believe any of the supernatural claims, so none of the rest matters except the words attributed to him, and even then, it wouldn't matter who wrote them. Most of the rest of the story could be historical or the opposite, and it changes nothing if the supernatural parts are fiction.



I do. Just as with the words of Jesus, it doesn't matter whether Socrates was a real person. What matters are the words attributed to him. Somebody wrote them. What if Shakespeare turned out to be a couple of sisters. That would be interesting, but wouldn't make the plays and sonnets any better or worth, no more or less worth reading.



So how about Saturn? He's got a weekday named after him, a solstice holiday, an adjective, a rocket engine, a planet, and a make of automobile. Given all of that influence on culture and your argument, Saturn not existing would also have to be a even greater miracle than his existence.

What’s that about Shakespeare?

 

oldbadger

Skanky Old Mongrel!
Hi,
That is a valid argument.
To decide we would have to weight the influence that each of these characters exercised on the world scene, should we feel that this is the major criteria for our decision.
It should influence you if billions of people are influenced by this, even if it influences you to get clear....
 
Top