• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Jesus: The Missing Years in the East

godnotgod

Thou art That
Arousing this topic publicly is appreciative but how we can find the answer of this question?

As I said, there is no smoking gun, but we need to look at everything that points to this idea all together, to see if it adds up.\

Certainly that Jesus remained in Nazareth, a town for which we have zero evidence, for some 18 years WITHOUT A SINGLE PEEP is virtually impossible, just as there was not a single peep about the Resurrection and Ascension until Paul adds a footnote to it some 40 years later. What these two vacuums point to is that the stories are contrived.
 
Last edited:
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
As I said, there is no smoking gun, but we need to look at everything that points to this idea all together, to see if it adds up.\

Certainly that Jesus remained in Nazareth, a town for which we have zero evidence, for some 18 years WITHOUT A SINGLE PEEP is virtually impossible, just as there was not a single peep about the Resurrection and Ascension until Paul adds a footnote to it some 40 years later. What these two vacuums point to is that the stories are contrived.

Sure it is. There is no reason to expect the Gospels to cover times in Jesus's life that are insignificant to their story. How were they supposed to know that 2,000 years later people would be interested in Jesus's non-eventual adolescent years.

There's so little early material about Jesus and it's so disputed that I'm glad there's not more. We have just enough to confuse us, and I think that if we had more, we would actually know less. It would be a more difficult puzzle to put together, a wider variety of people who reconstruct Jesus with partial misunderstandings of a few texts, those who demand all the texts, and everything in between.

And can you imagine -- each of these texts would have hundreds of years of layering, and everyone disagrees about which copy has more authority -- not to say anything of all of the interpretive, historical, and translation issues.

And after all of that work, we're still no closer to the historical Jesus than if we made up our own story.
 

godnotgod

Thou art That
Sure it is. There is no reason to expect the Gospels to cover times in Jesus's life that are insignificant to their story. How were they supposed to know that 2,000 years later people would be interested in Jesus's non-eventual adolescent years.

There's so little early material about Jesus and it's so disputed that I'm glad there's not more. We have just enough to confuse us, and I think that if we had more, we would actually know less. It would be a more difficult puzzle to put together, a wider variety of people who reconstruct Jesus with partial misunderstandings of a few texts, those who demand all the texts, and everything in between.

And can you imagine -- each of these texts would have hundreds of years of layering, and everyone disagrees about which copy has more authority -- not to say anything of all of the interpretive, historical, and translation issues.

And after all of that work, we're still no closer to the historical Jesus than if we made up our own story.

Did the other residents of Nazareth know that Jesus, now living amongst them for some 18 years, was God in the flesh? Or even that he had been born of a virgin?
 

outhouse

Atheistically
Arousing this topic publicly is appreciative but how we can find the answer of this question?

There are no missing years in the east.

Nada, zip. Only modern fabrications, imagination, wish and want.


Historically hypothesis like these would be laughed at in any academic circles. Right up there with the bermuda triangle, and unicorns.
 

Repox

Truth Seeker
Here is a possibility no one has considered. God popped into the world as a man, not as a baby. Immediately, God assumed his ministry as Jesus and then, after his murder, He ascended back into heaven without leaving a body.
 

godnotgod

Thou art That
If unicorns don't exist, then where do unicorn horns come from, hmm?

Ah, NOW you're talkin'! Why, it was 1st Century Nazareth's 'Best Kept Secret', of course!...uh....along with the fact that 'Nazarenes' (LOL) were keeping the lid on God living amongst them and pretending to be a humble carpenter for 18 years! (and unicorn hunter by night). Shhhhhh!
 

godnotgod

Thou art That
Both of those ideas are likely later interpolations.

However, Micah predicted his birth in Bethlehem years before. Certainly the word spread around that The Messiah was to be walking amongst them. Certainly the shepherd boy and the 3 Kings spread the news far and wide.* If nothing else, the elders who were amazed at the 12 year old's teachings in the Synagogue spread the news around Nazareth that a very wise person was amongst them.

Or was that also an interpolation?

And was the Annunciation an interpolation as well?

How about the notion of a 1st Century Nazareth, since no mention of one had been made before?

Or the doctrines of redemption via blood sacrifice, bodily resurrection, and virgin birth superimposed over the teachings of the Essene Yeshu?


*Luke 2 makes it clear that the shepherds (there were more than one, it turns out) DID spread the news:



Luke 2
New International Version (NIV)
The Birth of Jesus


2 In those days Caesar Augustus issued a decree that a census should be taken of the entire Roman world. 2 (This was the first census that took place while[a] Quirinius was governor of Syria.) 3 And everyone went to their own town to register.

4 So Joseph also went up from the town of Nazareth in Galilee to Judea, to Bethlehem the town of David, because he belonged to the house and line of David. 5 He went there to register with Mary, who was pledged to be married to him and was expecting a child. 6 While they were there, the time came for the baby to be born, 7 and she gave birth to her firstborn, a son. She wrapped him in cloths and placed him in a manger, because there was no guest room available for them.

8 And there were shepherds living out in the fields nearby, keeping watch over their flocks at night. 9 An angel of the Lord appeared to them, and the glory of the Lord shone around them, and they were terrified. 10 But the angel said to them, “Do not be afraid. I bring you good news that will cause great joy for all the people. 11 Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you; he is the Messiah, the Lord. 12 This will be a sign to you: You will find a baby wrapped in cloths and lying in a manger.”

13 Suddenly a great company of the heavenly host appeared with the angel, praising God and saying,

14 “Glory to God in the highest heaven,
and on earth peace to those on whom his favor rests.”
15 When the angels had left them and gone into heaven, the shepherds said to one another, “Let’s go to Bethlehem and see this thing that has happened, which the Lord has told us about.”

16 So they hurried off and found Mary and Joseph, and the baby, who was lying in the manger. 17 When they had seen him, they spread the word concerning what had been told them about this child, 18 and all who heard it were amazed at what the shepherds said to them. 19 But Mary treasured up all these things and pondered them in her heart. 20 The shepherds returned, glorifying and praising God for all the things they had heard and seen, which were just as they had been told.

21 On the eighth day, when it was time to circumcise the child, he was named Jesus, the name the angel had given him before he was conceived.
 
Last edited:

godnotgod

Thou art That
There are no missing years in the east.

Nada, zip. Only modern fabrications, imagination, wish and want.


Historically hypothesis like these would be laughed at in any academic circles. Right up there with the bermuda triangle, and unicorns.

But there are 18 missing years, aren't there?

Nada, zip. Only modern fabrications, imagination, wish and want.

Historically hypothesis like these would be laughed at in any academic circles. Right up there with the bermuda triangle, and unicorns
 

roger1440

I do stuff
What the Buddhist monks at the Hemis monastery in the Himalayas say about a certain St. Issa is not second-hand. It comes from their own mouths.

When I asked the question, I was inferring that their word carries more weight than the average Joe.

Have you heard about the St. Issa scrolls?

"Bart D. Ehrman, a Bible scholar and historian famous for his best sellers, says that "Today there is not a single recognized scholar on the planet who has any doubts about the matter. The entire story was invented by Notovitch, who earned a good deal of money and a substantial amount of notoriety for his hoax."[7]"
Nicolas Notovitch - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
Did the other residents of Nazareth know that Jesus, now living amongst them for some 18 years, was God in the flesh? Or even that he had been born of a virgin?

Probably not.

No one know that Jesus was God in the flesh until about 400 years later. The Gospels do indicate that some people knew of the scandal of his birth, but that really doesn't mean anything.
 
Top