Oh for crying out loud. That's how other people feel about the bible, and? Please don't attempt to turn this into anther bible V BoM debate. You couldn't win it on the thread you started, why go that way with this one?
The Bible vs. the Book of Mormon debate was funny when I first encountered it, but the thrill is gone. I encounter the inability to reason so often that it's become like my arthritis -- a nagging pain that is always there but is no longer very interesting.
Wanted he to suffer the martyr's death? No, he wanted that the Nauvoo legion freed him. He shot down two men with a smuggled gun, and wounded fatally. And he called the distress signal of the Freemasons when he fell from the window(Smith was Freemason). Does such a martyr of faith act? No! Thus a coward acts!!!!!
Whether Joseph Smith was a martyr for his faith or not is something best judged by that faith. I don't see him as a martyr for any worthy cause myself, but it would be surprising if Mormons didn't take a different view from mine.
However, the accusation of cowardice is obviously false. He returned to Illinois knowing his life was in danger there. And sure, he tried to get help, and he managed to arm himself and tried to defend himself against people who were trying to kill him -- who, in fact, succeeded in killing him almost immediately.
There's nothing cowardly about trying to get out of a difficult situation alive. There's nothing cowardly about arming yourself against people who seek your life. There's nothing cowardly about trying to defend yourself.
Maybe if a band of armed men busted in on your and your brother, killed your brother, and clearly intended to kill you, you would turn and die with a saintly smile on your lips. Up to you. Personally, though, I wouldn't blame anybody for trying to take out as many of the ******** as he could before they got him. I think that's what most people would do. If I had a gun, it's probably what I would do.