Ebionite
Well-Known Member
No, anyone can read the text if they know where to find it.Again, that is your personal interpretation like I mentioned earlier.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No, anyone can read the text if they know where to find it.Again, that is your personal interpretation like I mentioned earlier.
The first part of my comment was to direct the reader (you) about who was writing it.I think the first part of your comment may be directed at someone else.
You can’t be blamed for what you don’t see.I don't see the connection with what I wrote.
That is because you are not considering what it meant for Avram ben-Terahh to leave his family. I.e. Jewish sources are clear that he was living in an environment that was not keeping the 7 mizvoth / the Noachide laws. He had no mitzvah to stay with his parents who did not keep the 7 mizvoth. Besides, according to Jewish sources Avram ben-Terahh didn't leave until his father had passed away and had been buried.
Edit - Correction, what I wrote in the red above is incorrect.
Correction to the above, what I wrote in red Avram ben-Terahh, not being a post Torah at Mount Sinai Jew, was commanded to leave his father to take up the Torah of his time. He is considered the model of conversion to the Torah. That is not in any way similar to the NT story I quoted. The Jewish man in that story, being the sone of Jewish parents, is required to respect and them and take care of their need. Because the Torah at Mount Sinai was given after Avram ben-Terahh once can't apply the direct command that Hashem to Avram, specifically to do.
If it Christianity it is acceptable logic for a person to abandon his parents for what someone claims to be a mission and burying them is not acceptable in Christianity that is something outside of the Hebrew Torah that Jews received and something else.
I'm not sure I agree. I've been a prolific writer all my life. In fact my minor at the University was English Composition. I think anyone could compare my writing back in 1980 to now and see the same style.The problem with that is, people tend to change their style. For example I don't now write in the same ways as 20 years ago, because I have learned many things since then. Textual critic could not recognize my texts from back 20 years.
Other texts indicate a connection to prophecy:
You really have it out for Terah don’t you.
Spitting on Terah does not elevate Abram, that is an immoral way to think.
Isaiah 53 connects to Psalm 35 because of the righteous servant. The "friend" here is Judas.Read Isaiah. It will bolster your position. I am your friend. I AM ...
In support of your position:
Deut. 23:8-9 " You shall not abhor them...they may join the nation after 3 generations."
Those generations have long since passed. Edom and Mitzrayim came from Terah if I recall.
I have only started Exodus recently so yet to read that far!And if Egypt can be forgiven, how much more so all the others? ( Kal v'chomer. It's Talmudic logic. When arguing with Ehav Bring out the big guns. )
Torah Methodology #1 – Kal v’Chomer - The 13 Rules of Rabbi Yishmael - OU Torah
The most basic hermeneutical methodology is the kal v’chomer, known in Latin as an argument a fortiori, meaning “from the stronger case.” The nature of an arguoutorah.org
We can say that Abram never considered the idols to be God. So with Terah, who lived before the commandments, made idols and also wealth in the religiously diverse Harran, such that it could be given to Abram!You are so right, and more. The fact that God placed Abram in the house of an idol maker is HUGE. Abram can become Abraham and he came from the House of Terah? How much more so for anyone anywhere in perpetuity.
I have only started Exodus recently so yet to read that far!
We can say that Abram never considered the idols to be God
So with Terah, who lived before the commandments
The House of Terah financed God’s promise! This is poetic justice, not shame or blasphemous.
We should also see that Abram buried two people in his life, his father and his wife. I consider them equally important.
Chapter 2 Moses is born! I switch between New International and Orthodox JewishWhere are you in the story? Which translation?
I believe he knew and feared the true God as knowledge he inherited from Adam. I also don't believe God would have spoken to him otherwise. I understand Joshua says differently, but I don't believe it is a point of contention.Why do you say that?
Yes. This is my belief, I don't see why they should have "existed" eternally.Are you sure?
The First Beit Midrash: The Yeshivah of Shem and Eber
The first historically known beit midrash probably began during the era of the Second Temple. The Pharisees, unlike the Sadducees, emphasized that Torah learning, and not only temple service, was a vital aspect of Jewish life. Thus, physical centers of Jewish learning slowly became the heart of...www.kolhamevaser.com
Note how the Hittites call Abraham a "mighty prince", indirectly respecting Terah as a king (of Harran).Nice.... I like it. Great idea!
Really nice! Awesome observation. I never thought of that. Kudos.
Note how the Hittites call Abraham a "mighty prince", indirectly respecting Terah as a king (of Harran).
Abraham is also insistent that he pay for Sara's burial place, rather than accepting without, and this is Abraham returning the respect the Hittites have showed his father by using Terah's wealth (one could say) to do so.
One final gift to Abraham from the House of Terah so he could bury his beloved wife.
Orthodox Jewish
This is where I need to add potentially pagan information! Given it is the Hittities that are using the term "mighty prince" or "prince of God", they should also provide the explanation.Dude! That is fantastic! Wow. wow. I am blown away, right now. No, I did not notice that. It could be that Abraham is a prince of the Al-mighty, but, still. Great insight. You could be right.
My vote? It's a solid theory. Well done. So, what are the implications of this? Besides that Terah the idol maker is an important part of the story? Anything else? What can we learn from it? How can I apply this in my life?
Yes, I like the contrast in language!Side-bar: It's not a "Jewish" translation.
Again, what you presented is your personal interpretation and if again you are stuck with the fact if you are essentially saying you have made up or each time you read a text in the Hebrew language you have personal pronunciation that you have made up and that noone taught you. This is what I mean by what you are stating is your personal interpretation. If you are, for example, considering yourself to be an Ebionite this would also be the case because the Ebionites died out ~1,700 years ago.No, anyone can read the text if they know where to find it.
No, the pronunciation is from an extant text, I didn't make it up.you have personal pronunciation that you have made up
Greetings. No, I don't have it out for Terah. Let’s look at what various commentaries say about him.You really have it out for Terah don’t you.
Righteousness is everything. The very idea Abram wouldn’t bury his own father should make you question everything.
Spitting on Terah does not elevate Abram, that is an immoral way to think.
There is no spitting on Terah going on here. There is simple an expression of what various sources state about the conditions of the world at the time of Avraham's taking up the directive of Hashem. The following by Rabbi Uri Sharqi may be of interest. It addresses the death of Terah in relation to the death Sara. It also addresses Terah's past in relation to his passing and to the life of Avraham.Spitting on Terah does not elevate Abram, that is an immoral way to think.
Okay, so let's see what you mean. Please transliterate=(the process of transferring a word from the alphabet of one language to another) into English letters the following, based on your claim of pronunciation, so I can understand how you are saying the text should be correctly pronounced. Also, please mark ever place where a pause or stop is added.No, the pronunciation is from an extant text, I didn't make it up.
So, where did you find it and in what language did you find it?No, anyone can read the text if they know where to find it.
Greetings. No, I don't have it out for Terah. Let’s look at what various commentaries say about him.
Rashi states the Midrash and Aggada that Terah took Avram to Nimrud due to Avram’s actions against Terah’s avodah zara. Of course we all know the story of what Nimrud is stated to have judged against Avram. Thus, the Midrash and Aggada doesn’t paint Terah during that time in a favourable light.
View attachment 94315
Further to this, Rashi later addresses the concept of what Terah’s death is mentioned before Avram leaving Haran. I.e. Avram’s time in Haran would have placed him leaving before Terah’s death.
View attachment 94316
View attachment 94317
Ramban brings up both the Rashi above and other perspectives that state that during Terah’s life time he was not in the right situation with Hashem. The claim is made that because of the affect of his son Avraham, Terah made teshuva.
View attachment 94318View attachment 94319
Those are just two sources for what Terah’s situation was. The Rashi above also addresses the issue of Avraham leaving Haran, before Terah’s death and its justification on the past events involving Terah’s death.