Sure, Buddhism has adapted to many different cultures. But Buddhism is different from Hinduism and Hinduism is different from Christianity and Christianity is different from Islam and so on. Why pretend that things are the same when they are not?
Hinduism is the odd one out in that set, by being the one that isn't a single religion, but a body of several religions. Specifically religions that, unlike the other three listed, have no founder(with a few exceptions), but comprise India's organically developed indigenous religions.
Consider that in the West, we have the Four Classical Elements of Earth, Wind, Fire, and Water. That has its source in Indian philosophy. Consider also the popularity of the Horned God in Celtic polytheism, both modern and apparently pre-Christian, as well as in other modern Pagan and Neopagan religions that derive a lot of inspiration from Insular Celtic Lore. Yet this Horned God is most likely the Hellenic Pan.
Or, heck, consider the vast spread of Indo-European culture merging with so many indigenous cultures to create wholly unique identities.
This sort of thing used to be the norm.
I would disagree with you Riverwolf, about the part I bolded and underlined. In my state alone, we have many Hindu temples. The influx of immigrants has led to many new types of temples, etc, here in my state. I also disagree that Judaism is ethnic. It can be and is in many cases but it still is a religion, based on the religious practices that are associated with it.
I used the term "largely" to denote the fact that the vast majority of Hinduism's near billion practitioners live in India. It's a matter of proportions, not sheer numbers. I'm well aware that there's plenty of Hindu presence elsewhere in the world.
I also wonder if you understand what I meant by "ethnic". Check my responses below for clarification, because I called it an "ethnic
religion," meaning it's absolutely a religion.
But it's important to have spiritual and moral goals in life set by both governments and people to improve the peace, security and happiness.
Do you not realize that by bringing the
government into such matters as morality and spirituality, you're in a sense advocating a theocracy?? We're trying to get
away from that!
The government deals with legalities and protections (to vastly oversimplify). Let us people
ourselves worry about morality and spirituality.