So Santa is the devil? Oh no!!
mmh. I am not aware that Santa is crawling on his belly. Silly Santa (aka Satan, apparently), he is not taking those God's curses too seriously, lol.
Ciao
- viole
Last edited:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So Santa is the devil? Oh no!!
Is he? I thought he was a fictitious character.
Yes, that is very true, That we should find it necessary, in the first place, to lie to our impressionable children, which I never did to mine, about a big fat old man, dressed in a red costume, who comes into our homes, when we are all asleep, and gives little children presenuts, for free. Parents that have worked hard, to buy those gifts for their children, only to have Santa recieve the praise for the love given by mum and dad. What is Saran main Goal. Yes, the destruction of the family unit. This doesn't help much, does it? Then, of course, we firmly instruct them to stay away from strangers, as though Santa is not a little strange, dressed up in a red costume. Then, as we get a little older, we are chastized for believing the lie that the adults told us. Our parents have not only been the only people who not only didn't even bother to buy us a Christmas present, but they also lied their pants off about the guy who, they said, did. Everything about the charactor of Santa is wrong and imoral. Your point is a good one until you look a little harder at its premises. Satan is a tool of Satan used to take away the true meaning of Christmas, for which he is to be commended for almost fulfilling his goal. Heck, the name "Santa" is an anagram of his own name "Satan". That should be a bit of a give away.
oh come on now Norman, you knew that! I mean come on, the red suit and all, no? LOL...talk about far fetched!So Santa is the devil? Oh no!!
Serenity said: As I have said above "Their lives consist of three score and ten years, approximately, and then nothing. All that loving, caring, acquiring of knowledge and building of relationships all gone in the blink of an eye. I cannot think of anything more depressing". We should pity them, have compassion for them, for not having what we have got, and even worse then that, not wanting it either.
Yet, once again, you have nothing to prove them wrong in their assertions.
You don't know if there is a heaven, you only have that hope, which is their eyes is futile.
What I believe gives me comfort but that does stop them from having ago at my beliefs. Besides, pity is nonevasive. They do not even have to know you have it for them. It is Godly Sorrow.
Why shouldn't they have 'a go' at your beliefs when you 'pity them'? Do you really not see how that could be insulting?
Yes, of course I do. If I, like yourself, truly believe in my ideology, then you immediately want to share that with others, and pity those who do not have it. In this sense pity is a positive not a negative.
No, sorry. I have never proselytized in my life and I never will. My path is my own. I have no right to force mine on someone else.
"pretty darn sure"? How? What proof do you have?
In eastern faiths, it is believed that souls choose what path and experience they need to have to further themselves along the path to enlightenment. That is what I meant.
Just a couple curious questions for you. You say that arheists have or rather, you phrased it " none of their business" to question your beliefs. Why, then, are you on a religious forum to debate topics on religions?
Apart from the fact that an assertion is an opinion, a postulation, a claim, that cannot be proven wrong or right, I am therefore somewhat bewildered as to why you are suggesting that I am trying to prove anybody wrong. That is a blatant misrepresentation of my intentions. It is not my objective to prove them wrong. Look at my posting history. 90% of it is in defence of my religion.
I have never claimed absolute knowledge of Heaven, indeed, I believe it to be pretty empty right nòw, if even in existence, that is, up until judgement day, when we will be assigned our mansions. If anyone claims that anyone from this mortal probation is in heaven, right now, then they do not understand Christianity and, therefore, preach false doctrine. Only after the judgement day will it be populated. How else could it be?
What is futile in hope.
They shouldn't have a go because it is none of their business. I am not asking them to come and join me or be as I am. I defend my religion, I do not promote it.
No, I really do not see how that could be insulting, tell me how pity can be construed as an insult. I am all ears. Only pity is to have compassion for others. Compassion is a good thing that you seem persistent in denying them
Neither do I proselytise. If you were to have read my post you would know that I see no more benefits in proselytising. I have said, on many, many occasions, that my path is my own. That my belief is personal to me, that I cannot give anybody what I have, but only they can get it for themselves. I to have said "I have no right to force mine on someone else." You judge me incorrectly. Nothing I have said here suggests, in the remotest, that I proselytise. Not all Christians proselytise. Yet again, you misrepresent me with baseless asseverations. To share ones belief is not to proselytise. Proselytising is to use a degree of coercion where as sharing is not.
The Holy Ghost is my proof, and all that I require. Where is the proof in your religion.
And what evidence can you bring to the table to corroborate your belief.
Just a couple curious questions for you. You say that arheists have or rather, you phrased it " none of their business" to question your beliefs. Why, then, are you on a religious forum to debate topics on religions?
Also, let me tell you from my own POV, pity is insulting. I am a very plain woman, I was billies all through high school and so forth. Never in my life have I asked for and more importantly wanted pity. Pity, to me, is a sad concept. In my path, we don't pity. We show compassion, which, again, IMO, is vastly different. See, to me, pity is something people do when they look at lepers, and trust me, I treated those with hanson's disease and it is NOT what they want. They want help and care and compassion. Do you see the difference in that?
Lastly, I never claimed to have proof of my faith serenity, That is the difference between you and I. You state you have defintive proof but truthfully, you know you don't. I don't try to convince anyone. I just try to live my life full of compassion, honestly, valor and strength. I hope you understand. Peace to you and Namaste.
Um... No?I initially came here to debate with fellow Christian's from different denominations to get a better perspective of what others believed in. It is a Christian forum, right...
Serenity said: I initially came here to debate with fellow Christian's from different denominations to get a better perspective of what others believed in. It is a Christian forum, right, so i expected Christians to be here. Not so, the majority here are atheists, with most of them being anti-theists. Needless to say, I very soon came to realise that these forums are full of ****-taking atheists who are here solely to lambaste and insult Christians. Since then I spend 90% of my time here defending my faith and 10% in trying to educate the atheists, who wants to be educated, in the true meaning and ethos of christianity, and not the hogwash that most of them think it is. It is nothing to do with me if someone does not believe in a God, however, surely it is wise to be informed about that which you do not believe in before you can debate it. The majority of atheist do not even know what the Plan of Salvation is all about. The absolute core of Christianity, so, they stupify themselves in debating from total ignorance, thus contravening the well known fallacy of "argumentum ad ignorantiam" .
Serenity, this is NOT a Christian forum. It is a religious forum, meant for any and all faiths, including the lack thereof. There is a place for just Christians if you look under the general header of forums. And please! **** taking???? Wow...talk about insulting.
Nobody seeks after pity, or ought to. It is given through the compassion of those who truly care. If you check your dictionary for the word "pity" you will see that it is synonymous with "compassion." They both mean the same thing. That is not my definition, that is the English dictionary definition. But let me tell you about those who suffer with rejecting pity. It is a pride issue for them. Jesus has told us that only when you are in the service of your fellow man, are you in the service of your God. Christ pitied us, which is why he died for us. It is a noble trait to both give and recieve pity. To ask for, or expect it, is a completely different thing, but to prevent those who want to give it by rejecting it is a haneous sin. It prevents God from blessing them who need it and it prevents them who need it from being blessed, and it prevents those who give it from receiving the joy that giving brings.
Madame, pity and compassion are far from synonymous. Pity no one wants. Compassion is something we all need, even the "**** taking" atheists, which clearly you do not have any for.
I pity you for not having understood as I have! Sounds positive, am I right?
But that has been implied in your posts.Yes, I would say so, although I would have written it as "what a pity that you misunderstood". To add the "as I have" is condescending, arrogant and self-exalting.
But that has been implied in your posts.
Perhaps you can't see it yourself but it's there when you speak of "nasty atheists" and pitiable people who don't have their heads screwed on right enough to want to bet on an afterlife.