Marriage and sexuality

[enchanted_one1975]

Would someone please ask madhatter this question and keep asking it until he answers?

Should a heterosexual couple who choose not to bear children, but either adopt or not have children, be allowed to marry?

Thanks.

I think madhatter uses his household as the roadmap for everyone else's life. Drives him nuts to see any of us live our lives differently than him. Sounds like good old fashioned communism to me. The answer to that question would be whether or not he would get married without the intention of having children.

 

[madhatter85]

Does this mean it is better to marry someone you hate of the opposite sex then someone you love of the same sex? Assuming those are the only two options available.

you're making it sound like all homosexuals hate people of the opposite sex or, as if all gay men were misogynistic and all gay women are misandrystic. which is hardly the case.

 

[Kerr]

you're making it sound like all homosexuals hate people of the opposite sex or, as if all gay men were misogynistic and all gay women are misandrystic. which is hardly the case.

That was not what I meant, and you have yet to answer the question.

 

[madhatter85]

stating homosexuality is just a "behaviour"makes your argument invalid...and frankly is rather simplitic

Homosexuality denotes a behavioral pattern where someone is attracted sexually to members of the same gender.

 

[enchanted_one1975]

you're making it sound like all homosexuals hate people of the opposite sex or, as if all gay men were misogynistic and all gay women are misandrystic. which is hardly the case.

Homosexuals do not have an attraction to people of the opposite sex. Bisexuals have an attraction to people of both sexes. Heterosexuals have an attraction to people of the opposite sex only. I hope that this clarifies things for you.

 

[Mr Cheese]

you're making it sound like all homosexuals hate people of the opposite sex or, as if all gay men were misogynistic and all gay women are misandrystic. which is hardly the case.

you make it sound like all white heterosexual christians are bigots...dear one

in fact there have been threads on that very subject....sadly

 

[madhatter85]

Once again....

accordign to research homosexuals come from heterosexuals.... predominantly

Arguably then, heterosexuals are killing the human race

False, due to this research we can simply deduce that homosexuality is not inheritable, Thus further differentiating it from ethnicity or race.
Which means it is a genetic flaw.

 

[Mr Cheese]

Homosexuals do not have an attraction to people of the opposite sex. Bisexuals have an attraction to people of both sexes. Heterosexuals have an attraction to people of the opposite sex only. I hope that this clarifies things for you.

heterosexual sexuality is superior as it always involves actions that may produce babies

Hetero couples never do anythign sexually that would not lead to children

Thinking otherwise is just plain dumb

 

[enchanted_one1975]

Homosexuality denotes a behavioral pattern where someone is attracted sexually to members of the same gender.

Those that engage in interracial relationships denote a behavorial pattern where someone is attracted sexually to members of a different race.

 

[Autodidact]

Might be a good time to reiterate that question. (sorry to be so bossy; I'm on ignore, so posting vicariously through you.)

 

[madhatter85]

you make it sound like all white heterosexual christians are bigots...dear one

in fact there have been threads on that very subject....sadly

that's funny as I have said nothing bigoted towards homosexuals. I have previously acknowledged that they have the same capacity for procreation and love as anyone else on the planet. However, they chose to act on behavior that is contrary to the fundamental nature of our existence and survival.

 

[enchanted_one1975]

False, due to this research we can simply deduce that homosexuality is not inheritable, Thus further differentiating it from ethnicity or race.
Which means it is a genetic flaw.

In that case then let's not let those born handicapped marry anyone that wasn't also born handicapped. That is not genetic but why should they be allowed to pair up with "normal" people? They are so different and not beneficial to your little dreamland utopia.

 

[madhatter85]

Homosexuals do not have an attraction to people of the opposite sex. Bisexuals have an attraction to people of both sexes. Heterosexuals have an attraction to people of the opposite sex only. I hope that this clarifies things for you.

So, then by your own logic you are saying marriage is only about sexual gratification.

 

[Kerr]

So, then by your own logic you are saying marriage is only about sexual gratification.

That is not it at all, it is about love. That you should be able to marry your true love. Even if they are of the same sex.

 

[Autodidact]

that's funny as I have said nothing bigoted towards homosexuals. I have previously acknowledged that they have the same capacity for procreation and love as anyone else on the planet. However, they chose to act on behavior that is contrary to the fundamental nature of our existence and survival.

That this is so plainly wrong, and so obviously a result of pure bigotry, appears to be invisible to madhatter.

 

[Mr Cheese]

False, due to this research we can simply deduce that homosexuality is not inheritable, Thus further differentiating it from ethnicity or race.
Which means it is a genetic flaw.

actually no, it shows that homosexuality is a minority...

and well it doesnt take rocket science to show that the vast majority are of course more likely to produce minorities, as there are simply more of them to produce such things.....

However given your logic.... homosexuality, accordign to science and medicine (afterall your arguemnts are all based around science and medicine, right :sarcastic)is created BY heterosexuals.

Given this fact
If homosexuals are in effect killing the human race.
We should sterelise and maybe kill lots of heterosexuals to prevent the "disease"
(I think in this context it is safe to say same sex couples are a disease, as they are lowering the survival rate, thus quirte accuratly they are a disease)of homosexuality.

You see, if homosexuality is goign to doom the human race, why not kill their parents to prevent them breeding.

Thus I think it is our civic duty to maybe sterelise or kill all the women and men of every other generation. Then we can slowly watch the numbers of homosexuals dwindle.

This is plain logic, prvent them breeding and producing the disease, or take a chance and simple let the disease spread and grow, and pretend we can ever just blot them out and be rid of homosexuality forever.


Or we could stick our thumbs in our ears and sing Kumbya....

 

[enchanted_one1975]

So, then by your own logic you are saying marriage is only about sexual gratification.

You remind me why I left Christianity in a trail of dust behind me.

It's not only about sexual gratification, but I charge you with the task of finding one couple that has been married their whole lives without having sexual relations. You can't make all these babies that you swear are the whole reason to marry of the opposite sex if there is no attraction because certain things don't happen...unless you are a pervert, of course.

 

[madhatter85]

In that case then let's not let those born handicapped marry anyone that wasn't also born handicapped. That is not genetic but why should they be allowed to pair up with "normal" people? They are so different and not beneficial to your little dreamland utopia.

Wrong again, I am not pushing for a Utopian society, eugenics, or Darwinism.

Handicapped people are also allowed the same privilege of marrying any member of the opposite sex as long as their behavior is consistent with the broad scope of societal normality and they are mentally able to make decisions for themselves.

 

[Kerr]

Madhatter85, would you mind answering the question I asked before. Is it better if two hetrosexuals that hate each other marry then if two homosexuals who love each other marry? And as before, for the sake of the question these are the only options.

 

[Kerr]

Wrong again, I am not pushing for a Utopian society, eugenics, or Darwinism.

Handicapped people are also allowed the same privilege of marrying any member of the opposite sex as long as their behavior is consistent with the broad scope of societal normality and they are mentally able to make decisions for themselves.

What of the society norms are screwed up and involves rape?