I guess I have the right to understand.
It's something that traumatized me...in the nineties, when I heard of Clinton and Lewinski.
It's an unresolved issue.
Clinton treated as a criminal just because he had an extra-marital affair with a younger woman.
Is that because he was a straight man?
It’s because he was famous lol
That’s pretty much the only reason why people cared.
Here was the President of the United States. A supposed leader of the free world, seemingly abandoning “family values” that the US claims to champion.
It’s the same reason why whenever a football player gets caught having even consensual sex with someone else, society at large seemingly wants to weigh in on such a “scandal.”
Hell they might even lose their contract or get involved in some stupid trumped up charge. Depending on the scenario. It’s happened here plenty of times.
And we’re far more”European” than American, all things considered.
Well we were
Either way. If the player didn’t have the broader fame and the apparent need to be a spokesperson for something that everyone watched, no one would care if they slept with a 1000 women. Even if they were married.
Well the spouse may care but no one else would
Same with Clinton. But he had the added detriment of politics. His opponents, who may have had affairs of their own, who knows. Had easy ammunition they could exploit and appeal to people’s emotions. If he were just some rando, he could have had as many affairs as he wanted without.