Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
As opposed to objectifying women in Islamic societies? I hope you don't put on a straight face when you say that.It's the byproduct of a culture that objectifies, commercializes, and places price tags on women.
There you go:Do you intend to bring up irrelevant and tangential information in every thread I am in?
For years, Egyptian women have put up with sexual harassment, simply for walking down the street.
Now they are coming out into the open to say 'enough is enough'. At a rally in Tahrir Square last month, female protesters came under attack.
Water was thrown into the crowd in an attempt to repel the mob of men who were groping women and trying to remove their clothes.
An anti-harassment demonstration became itself a target for harassment.
What used to be a silent shame has now been thrust into the open, with exhibitions and events.
The revolution in Egypt has raised the expectations of many women.
Yes. And I still find your little statement about the objectification of women in the west to be grotesque. Now, if you would discuss the objectification of all women in human society, it might have looked more constructive... and honest. But alas, it's not the frist time male Muslim members create threads about their self righteous misconceptions of women and the west.For shame you are digging yourself only a deeper hole or did you gloss over my entire response?
Yes blunt statements are hard to take.objectification of women in the west to be grotesque
We are discussing "Men in the West are dressed in full; women are dressed half , quarter or less" what leap of thinking lead to humanity in large.the objectification of all women in human society
Exactly. Another self righteous preception about women and 'western society'. The entire OP is self righteous and reeks of ignorance.Yes blunt statements are hard to take.
We are discussing "Men in the West are dressed in full; women are dressed half , quarter or less" what leap of thinking lead to humanity in large.
Even then most men dress in full.
Women are not property of men; that is OK; but then why get dressed less?
There is nothing ignorant about questioning one's own society, it tends to be progressive actually.Exactly. Another self righteous preception about women and 'western society'. The entire OP is self righteous and reeks of ignorance.
What does it show?
Because wearing a burka sucks.Even then most men dress in full.
Women are not property of men; that is OK; but then why get dressed less?
There is nothing ignorant about questioning one's own society, it tends to be progressive actually.
Because wearing a burka sucks.
Women dress however they want to. I personally prefer baggy T-shirts and jeans when dressing casually.
wa:do
I would say the trend has been less clothing for both men and women. Why are you only focused on the women?It is one's own decision as to how one dresses. I wanted to know as to why after nineteenth century women are usually less dressed than men in the West. What factors lead to it?
Are you saying that women wearing shorts and a t-shirt are leading men to cheat more? Or are you saying that the surplus of women caused men to cheat more?One factor, I think, could be that due to world wars; men got more killed in the wars and there were more women and less men; so there was a competition in the women to attract the men.
I think this has resulted into ultimately husbands cheating their wives sexually; more divorces; more family break-ups etc..
I've seen plenty of older ladies wearing shorts and t-shirts.Do women at old ages over 80s were attractive less wears such as very tight jeans or shorts...etc
Do you intend to bring up irrelevant and tangential information in every thread I am in? Reconsider that one I am living in a Western society on what charge or connection do you associate Saudi or Iranian culture to me for example?
Do I deny the objectification of women in Muslim society? No.
Do I agree with placing women within constraints such as these "Women are not an object to be placed in the kitchen, as a machine for producing babies, as a human being with no capabilities to walk unescorted without male observance, or drive cars, or stray from any traditional role enforced on them and which objectifies them as in God forbid the ability to vote, or develop a career." No.
Does your paragraph have any relation to the original topic? No.v
But it is pretty common place to have these diversions placed like a knee-jerk reaction every-time I criticize these aspects, I expect them but it does not diminish what I said.
I didn't pick the term nor do I disagree with the fact that it is a generalising one. However what it does well is give arise to the connotation of first world European countries (and their colonies) which is what is being discussed no? Within all of these societies, as far as I am knowledgable of, there is variance among women naturally with populations this large but social media and public perception of women is another thing entirely. If you flip through any makeup or clothing advertisement it is selling the sexuality of women and placing a price tag on it."the west" is not a society.... it's a collection of many varied societies. You wouldn't expect me to claim that "middle eastern society" is a valid group. Saudi's are not the same as Iranians or Jordanians or Israelis and so on.