Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Maybe I should try to explain this differently:
If you say that answered prayer is a test for God, then unanswered prayer is evidence against God... but you say that it's evidence for God as well. If all outcomes of your "test" points to the same conclusion, then it's not a test at all.
To put it another way, what do you think we could search for that, if we found it, would be evidence against the existence of God?
Well right off hand, if we found that Jesus never existed, then I think that would be evidence against God existing. But all the evidence I have seen, points to him indeed existing. The river Jordan , where Jesus was baptised exist until this day. We have the actual house of Mary and Martha, two good freinds of Jesus. They have unearthed the tomb of Lazarus, whom Jesus raised from the dead, they got this tomb man. They found the place where Jesus was crucified, it existed, the Place of the Skull - Golgotha, where they killed him. We have the tomb of Joseph, another associate of Christ. They have even found the bones of Caiaphas the high Priest who slapped Jesus in the face for claiming to be the Son of God, they got this guys bones man, he existed just like the bible claims he did. And many Roman historians mention Christ in their writings.
But as I have stated, prove Christ didnot exist, and in my view, you prove God does not either.
Peace.
Okay...so you are willing to be stubborn in your quest for faith.
That's good.
But I would leave superstition alone.
I prefer to take the details that science brings forth, and then stubbornly,
repeatedly, with serious intent declare....
"God did it!"
Well sure. All science can tell us is how God did it. Some of you have the very erroneous idea that science is some sort of alternative explanation for existence. And it really isn't. First off, it hasn't explained that genesis, yet. And secondly, when it does, all it can explain is the how. So an alternative to 'God did it', science certainly is not, and never will be.Okay...so you are willing to be stubborn in your quest for faith.
That's good.
But I would leave superstition alone.
I prefer to take the details that science brings forth, and then stubbornly,
repeatedly, with serious intent declare....
"God did it!"
I still don't understand why he views animals to be such lowly creatures in the first place. What's wrong with being an ape? Why is it such a bad thing to be related to dolphins, horses, wolves, gorillas, ect? Why does it matter if we're not more special than the other creatures on this planet? Mickiel, does the idea of being related to all animals really make you feel worse or something?
If jesus did indeed exist, thats not proof of a "god." Thats proof of a man named jesus.
When you examine science, do you find it is accurate or not? And when you examine superstition, what do you find?
I have a milk jug at home in the refrigerator that is God.This is one of the most magnanamous proofs of God, answered prayer. I personally have experienced this multiple times. Just ask God to do certain things that I knew were difficult things, and then watch them get done. And I just knew it was him. One time I asked God for a house in Atlanta. One day I was cutting a tree for a customer, who asked me if I wanted a house, and she gave it to me for nothing. A bueatiful home.
Things like this just don't happen, but prayer can do things like that.
And I want to go into that.
Peace.
Its proof of God man, and flat out serious proof, but only for serious acceptance of reality to the consciousness that needs that.
Peace.
First the apology, then I will converse with you.
Peace.
Yet none of those are used in, say a paternity test, or testing for heredity.Being chemically related to animals means nothing but the same creator used simular ingredients in creating us. For example, Milk chemistry indicates that the Donkey is mans closest relative. Cholesterol level test indicate that the Garter Snake is mans closest relative. Tear enzyme chemistry indicates that the chicken is mans closest relative. On the basis of another blood chemistry test, the Butter Bean is mans closest relative.
Peace.
Why would this point to Jesus existing?Well right off hand, if we found that Jesus never existed, then I think that would be evidence against God existing. But all the evidence I have seen, points to him indeed existing. The river Jordan , where Jesus was baptised exist until this day.
Do we? I've never heard anyone claim this before.We have the actual house of Mary and Martha, two good freinds of Jesus.
Do they?They have unearthed the tomb of Lazarus, whom Jesus raised from the dead, they got this tomb man.
How do they know that's the place?They found the place where Jesus was crucified, it existed, the Place of the Skull - Golgotha, where they killed him.
Which Joseph, and how do they know?We have the tomb of Joseph, another associate of Christ.
Caiaphas was a prominent public figure, and it's perfectly reasonable to assume that the Bible authors would have known of him. Finding his bones no more proves the Bible than finding the bones of Hitler would prove the movie Casablanca.They have even found the bones of Caiaphas the high Priest who slapped Jesus in the face for claiming to be the Son of God, they got this guys bones man, he existed just like the bible claims he did.
Not really. The only one I've seen that appears to be genuine is from Josephus (and not the longer and IMO forged Testimonium Flavianum but the other, shorter passage). There are other historians who discuss Christians, but that's not the same thing.And many Roman historians mention Christ in their writings.
Being chemically related to animals means nothing but the same creator used simular ingredients in creating us. For example, Milk chemistry indicates that the Donkey is mans closest relative. Cholesterol level test indicate that the Garter Snake is mans closest relative. Tear enzyme chemistry indicates that the chicken is mans closest relative. On the basis of another blood chemistry test, the Butter Bean is mans closest relative.
Peace.
If your faith is so weak that it needs an apology every time someone doesn't agree with you or tries to make a point, than it's completely useless talking with you. And it leads me to believe that you have no sense of humor. You need to lighten up man.
I only ask for apoligy when I am disrespected, called rude names or am consistantly lied on. I do not ask for apoligy because of disagreement or point making, and I do not like you insuinating that.
Peace.
Why would this point to Jesus existing?
I.