Or let the girl and her child in but not the pedo husband. I'm not without my kindness and sympathy.
I'll go with that.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Or let the girl and her child in but not the pedo husband. I'm not without my kindness and sympathy.
Easy answer is to not let them in.
Which means she will continue to suffer what we would constitute as statutory rape, but it's not inside our borders, so not our problem?
[edit] Sorry, that sounds more judgey that I meant it to...I think this issue is a little tricky, actually.[/edit]
You do, I don't.Interesting take.
I understand (and agree) about the issues of separating a 14 year old from her child.
Oh no! You might be able to compare young husbands against old where you are, but as far as the UK is concerned a husband's age is of no account in all this. For instance, one strong rationale is our Equality Act 2010 which forbids prejudice of any kind over age.How do you rationalise leaving the 14 year old with her husband (assuming the husband is substantially older...let's say in his 30's for the sake of argument)?
What you say is unfortunately true,in a way by doing so we're just washing our hands of it, it's a tricky situation.
I think that we gotta protect asylum seekers even if their marriages don't align with out legislation. I wonder if foreign Gays can marry younger than in the UK, and if so, what if they sought asylum here?
It's our duty to protect Asylum seekers, I reckon, leaving their marriages alone.
This calls for a new thread, but who's brave enough to do it, who? Who??Paedophilia is a crime, you can't have separate laws Imo,.
Islamic marriage should be possible.
Yes........ how obscene....
Are you being sarcastic?Yes, interfering with marriage sure is obscene.
Interfering with a 14/15yr olds children is worse than obscene, it's outrageous.
Ah........ but is it? In an Asylum containment centre, is it?Paedophilia is a crime, you can't have separate laws Imo,.
No...... just take what I wrote as my strong opinion.Are you being sarcastic?
They're not all 14 or 15.
Even a 14-year-old needs to be 16 one day, unless...
If they're over 15yrs, then no problem, ok?They're not all 14 or 15.
Well we're discussing asylum seekers who are married and under 16yrs. Or at least, I am.Even a 14-year-old needs to be 16 one day, unless...
Ah........ but is it? In an Asylum containment centre, is it?
Look, I know snuff all about this, but do you know about the condition of Bonded Stores? These areas are not classed as being within our country (technically) and they can be situated inland. Equally, Asylum Centres could possibly be classed as international areas......... it might even be the way that we handle this kind of thing here. I need to go looking, later on..,...
"Should a 14-year-old married girl who migrates to Europe be viewed as a child - or a spouse?
The issue has put European governments in a spin: forcing a policy U-turn in Denmark, new legislation in the Netherlands and an agonised debate in Germany."
Migrant child brides put Europe in a spin
So, should nations accept and permit migrants to continue having sexual relations with minors, when it is against the law to do so?
I'd be inclined to refuse them entry and pass the problem to someone else.this is a rather sticky problem. Many of these child brides do not want to be separated from their husbands. It also appears, at least in the examples sited, that these are not creepy old men, but men in their twenties generally. What do you do it the bride has had children and she thinks of all of them as a family? It is not a problem that I would want to try to solve.
Here you are with your bs again.Koran verse 5:51 gives the solution:
O you who have believed, do not take the Jews and the Christians as allies. They are [in fact] allies of one another. And whoever is an ally to them among you - then indeed, he is [one] of them. Indeed, Allah guides not the wrongdoing people.[allies = protectors]
Coming to a non-Muslim country refugees take them as ally, they are one of them; so they follow the law of that country. Practical verse nowadays
I'm joking obviouslyPlus, Europeans are very evil. Who in their right mind would want to live with them?
Which part is BS? The Quran has more gruesome hateful versus than that.Here you are with your bs again.
Spreading misinformation with an air innocence..
That's an interesting point, I'll be interested with what you come up with.