Anthem
Active Member
The interpretation of it.Which part is BS? The Quran has more gruesome hateful versus than that.
And also def the claim that the muslims become allies to christians
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The interpretation of it.Which part is BS? The Quran has more gruesome hateful versus than that.
"Should a 14-year-old married girl who migrates to Europe be viewed as a child - or a spouse?
The issue has put European governments in a spin: forcing a policy U-turn in Denmark, new legislation in the Netherlands and an agonised debate in Germany."
Migrant child brides put Europe in a spin
So, should nations accept and permit migrants to continue having sexual relations with minors, when it is against the law to do so?
They're lovely. Really. My wife is European and I love living with her.Plus, Europeans are very evil. Who in their right mind would want to live with them?
"Should a 14-year-old married girl who migrates to Europe be viewed as a child - or a spouse?
The issue has put European governments in a spin: forcing a policy U-turn in Denmark, new legislation in the Netherlands and an agonised debate in Germany."
Migrant child brides put Europe in a spin
So, should nations accept and permit migrants to continue having sexual relations with minors, when it is against the law to do so?
The state has a duty to protect children and uphold the law. If you come to a country, you should conform to the laws of said country, not try to change it to your liking. It's like how I would never move to Saudi Arabia because it's a brutal hellhole.
Here you are with your bs again.
Spreading misinformation with an air innocence..
Open your eyes.I don't see BS here.
You can read from the governments's pages about how they hanlde it so you don't have make things up.If a government can't solve this problem before letting them in, they will not be able to handle it "properly" after letting them in.
Which means she will continue to suffer what we would constitute as statutory rape, but it's not inside our borders, so not our problem?
[edit] Sorry, that sounds more judgey that I meant it to...I think this issue is a little tricky, actually.[/edit]
Open your eyes.
This calls for a new thread, but who's brave enough to do it, who? Who??
I'd be inclined to refuse them entry and pass the problem to someone else.
Pass them on preferably to a Muslim country which allows children to be married and have sex above age 9
Would Saudi Arabia accept them?
I do know that EU Frans Timmermans has declared that they want 60 million Africans coming to Europe (ca. 10% increase of Europe population).
So it seems that EU already decided that Europe gets immigrants; see strasbourg resolution 1975. And more recently Marrakesh Plan.
Timmermans explained that Europe needs to become diverse. I also read that working population is rapidly decreasing, hence immigration needed
So it seems not the plan of the people ruling the world, that immigrants go to Saudi Arabia (assuming this strassburg/marrakesh is true).
https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/s..._declaration-and-action-plan-marrakesh_en.pdf
Oil for Immigration: What the 1975 Strasbourg Resolutions Meant to Europeans
I can't find anything.........That's an interesting point, I'll be interested with what you come up with.
I can't find anything.........
The trouble with frigging governments is, that they don't highlight their policies in delicate areas of contention, they just carry on until some keen journalist gets in there and rummages about.
Thing is, I don't happen to believe that a man who marriages a 14/15yrs old girl is automatically a pedo. And if they have a child together then they are a family unit. And so in cases where a family unit has run for its survival (asylum) I think we should extend all the understanding and care that we can. On the other hand, families who just want entry 'cos it's nice here are not in such danger and could be invited to go somewhere else, possibly a country that supports very young spouses?
Fair enough. I can understand your opinion about all this.I don't go with that, a man who marries a child has no moral fibre Imo, there's also the damage that can occur both physically and psychologically to the girl, I believe we must enforce the law, keep the girl and children together but he must be separate until she comes of age.
A lot of countries that allow child marriages have population that believes it is wrong.Fair enough. I can understand your opinion about all this.
Me? At day's end I support our legislation, whatever that may be..... we can always seek to get it changed with our votes.
Moral fibre is such an intangible character asset, though, and where countries allow marriage at 14 or 15 yrs I expect that folks there don't think that husbands/couples are disgusting and lacking moral fibre. I expect that some cultures think that we are generally despicable and of weak fibre.
Which unfortunate country will consent to migrant minors having sexual relations in the name of 'marriage' !!
Even in the case of the husbands being in their twenties, I don't think this is a healthy practice.
I remember reading in the newspapers about an underage girl in Yemen, who died of internal injuries after her 'husband' consummated the 'marriage'. Gross.
Yemeni child bride, eight, 'dies on wedding night'