Only "some Japanese" bombed Pearl Harbor.
The difference is in that incident it was a full scale war between two countries. A war between Japan and the United states where lots of horrible things have happened. However, in this case a few number of people carried out an individual attack towards the US.
The images of jubilant middle eastern Muslims dancing in the streets celebrating 9/11 are forever etched in the minds of many people. We know it was only "some Muslims" that flew those planes into those buildings - but we also know that thousands and thousands of Muslims worldwide celebrated that event as an Islamic victory. This is what I call an "unfortuate truth."
I don't recall ANY American Muslims doing so (though I'm sure there were some radicals - Muslim AND non Muslim - who thought the US deserved exactly what happened that day). I do recall scattered instances of American Muslims being harrassed shortly after 9/11. This is also an "unfortunate truth."
Exactly, this is also not representing muslim population. Lots of people Muslims and non-muslims had the horrible mentality that the US deserved this. I even saw a link here about 5 Israeli citizens who were reported to be doing the same. Also, like you said some middle eastern muslims where the ones seen or reported to do this, not American muslims. My point is lots of people have this mentality against the US. Its not something about or exclusive to muslims.
The bottom line is that emotions run very high, and are still very raw, regarding the events of that terrible day. To me, this imam is pouring salt in wounds. He knows that many New Yorkers, who were very personally impacted that day, and whose loved ones will never even be FOUND, oppose the PROXIMITY of this mosque. For whatever reasons, he has decided to be incredibly insensitive to their feelings. This is also an "unfortunate truth."
This brings his motives into speculation and suspicion. HE has instigated this level of suspicion by his level of insensitivity.
Most New Yorkers don't oppose the mosque's location just because it's a Muslim mosque (there are at least 100 mosques in NYC and to my knowledge, their members worship freely and peacefully in those mosques). Most people simply don't want it in the same vicinity that their loved one's ashes floated to the ground.
Do you mean, that the imam should be sensitive enough to not propose or not build this mosque/center in that place even though there is nothing wrong with that, or that he is wrong to build the mosque there( but should be allowed to)?
I mean, if your point is that he should not do this not because its wrong, and not because the arguments against the mosque/center is right, but as an extra effort to show that he is considerate to the feelings of the people who oppose it, even though they are not correct on those feelings, i would agree. But i wouldn't call him insensitive or at least deliberately insensitive towards them. Because their feelings towards him or his proposed building are not justified, so he doesn't have to oblige them.
Last edited: