doppelganger
Through the Looking Glass
Will that lead me to "God"?Follow your bliss.
Regards
DL
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Will that lead me to "God"?Follow your bliss.
Regards
DL
Follow your bliss.
Regards
DL
Not till people decide to give God a new name. Then we can have a physical representation.
Regards
DL
you mean there can only be one God, or only one belief about god? Either way I disagree
While I do find wisdom within the bible I don't think we NEED it whether it be old or new. Especially when you consider that the wisdom that can be found in the bible can be found almost universally in other sacred and philisophical texts.
Maybe from YOUR religionist point of view it's a bad thing. I'm religious and I don't see it as a bad thing and I'm sure that goes for many other religious people as well. Just because it's your opinion doesn't automatically make it correct or make it the only right idea, or the only idea one can really hold; yet you seem to be making that assumption
I fail to see what a "new name" has to do with any of this. Personally I think the gods choose for themselves if,when, and why they take on a physical body, just like the rest of us.
doppelgänger;1343114 said:Will that lead me to "God"?
Hogwash.
You are defeated before even ******* starting with that loser aptitude. Girdle your loins boy, manhood await.
Name this indefinable and I shall shew you how to handle such.
Regards
DL
Good advice. Allow god to do the same.
Shall we let god define himself?
On the contrary.
Starting with that attitude leaves for unlimited discovery.
If you're looking for a definitive.. well... definition, then once you have one, you're going to stop looking, thinking you've found it.
Defeated - only if I was going against something.
Loser - again.. only if I was competing with something.
That doesn't answer my question.Nothing else can.
I know what the negative effects of genocide are.
What are the positive effects?
When you answer you will see why some things are absolute.
Regards
DL
Then you are a Religionist fool.
Secularism means that society will move to where almost all things with little or no victim as legal.
I fail to see how allowing people more freedom can make them slaves.A form of slavery for all.
Except those things hurt, they have victims. So your contradicting yourself. First you say secularism will legalize anything that doesn't have a victim then as examples of this you state things that clearly have victims. Do you see the contradiction.Legal prostitution, gambling brawling, dog fights and **** fights. Are you ready to live in Rome of 100 AD.
Rather an ugly picture no.
Regards
DL
Get real.
Regards
DL
God is a puppet that rules at the pleasure of the people.
Regards
DL
I know what the negative effects of genocide are.
What are the positive effects?
When you answer you will see why some things are absolute.
Regards
DL
doppelgänger;1343148 said:That doesn't answer my question.
Me! :yes:Are any here looking for God?
Less competition, which means better chances of survival.
That was easy.
(keep in mind, I don't condone genocide in anyway shape or form)
MoonWater
Some thing like 60 % of hookers were abused in the home and basically forced into prostitution.
Many gamblers and drunks do their own thing but their families go hungry.
Are there any victims in victimless crimes. You bet.
No one lives in a vacuum.
Regards
DL
Me! :yes: