Mueller Hearings

[shmogie]

You are being critical of an individual while actively supporting those same actions present in another. There is a word for this.

Nevertheless, I take the word of someone in the intelligence community over a known conman any day.

Who said I supported them ? I didn´t . You brought up Muellers answer to the question, I opined on that.

Stating something absolutely not in evidence as a fact, has a word for it as well, lying.

So, you will take the word of A over B regarding C.

The word of anyone is irrelevant, either there is verifiable evidence, or there is not.

 

[The Reverend Bob]

This wasn't backdoor information it was posted on Wikileaks for the entire world to see. If it's wrong to relay information from the Internet then we are all guilty of it.

The Trump Tower meeting took place on June 9, 2016, the first tranche of 19,000 emails and 8,000 attachments was released on July 22, 2016, three days before the Democratic convention.

Trump Jr. Was Told in Email of Russian Effort to Aid Campaign

Russian Dirt on Clinton? ‘I Love It,’ Donald Trump Jr. Said

 

[shmogie]

If I was Trump I would be packing a bag and head out to Russia by now. He could be indicted as soon as he leaves office according to Mueller

LOL, Mueller did not identify an indictable offense. He made no effort to seek an indictment, he made no recommendation regarding a deferred indictment.

 

[Spirit of Light]

LOL, Mueller did not identify an indictable offense. He made no effort to seek an indictment, he made no recommendation regarding a deferred indictment.

It is up to congress to take down Trump, and i look forward to that day Trump is out office

 

[The Reverend Bob]

He made no effort to seek an indictment

Because that is not up to Mueller to do.

 

[The Reverend Bob]

Rep. Himes: The Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to achieve that outcome

Mueller: I believe so

 

[shmogie]

Because that is not up to Mueller to do.

Oh yes it was. He indicted a number of people. He may have been told that it would have to be deferred, but he made no effort.

Besides, the cannot be indicted till he leaves office rap is a policy, not a law. He could have tested it.

He weaseled out

 

[The Reverend Bob]

Oh yes it was. He indicted a number of people. He may have been told that it would have to be deferred, but he made no effort.

Besides, the cannot be indicted till he leaves office rap is a policy, not a law. He could have tested it.

He weaseled out

No, he was under orders not to indict the President.

 

[Kenny]

ABC News Senior National Correspondent Terry Moran on Democrats' Robert Mueller hearing: “impeachment’s over”

As I viewed it (some) Mueller was unconvincing with all of his stuttering, Democrats were fishing, and Republicans were on the election trail.

 

[shmogie]

It is up to congress to take down Trump, and i look forward to that day Trump is out office

Congress will do jacks**t. Even if impeached, he will not be removed from office by the senate.

Impeachment is a dead duck, and if they try it, it will only come out bad for the democrats.

 

[shmogie]

No, he was under orders not to indict the President.

Who gave him those orders ?

 

[Spirit of Light]

Congress will do jacks**t. Even if impeached, he will not be removed from office by the senate.

Impeachment is a dead duck, and if they try it, it will only come out bad for the democrats.

So the President is above the law now then?

 

[The Reverend Bob]

Who gave him those orders ?

The OLC.

 

[The Reverend Bob]

So the President is above the law now then?

Not when he leaves office.

 

[Spirit of Light]

Not when he leaves office.

True, But he is not above the law when he is in office too, right?

 

[The Reverend Bob]

True, But he is not above the law when he is in office too, right?

Not really, but current policy is not to indict a sitting president. If they want to impeach then they need further investigation

 

[Spirit of Light]

Not really, but current policy is not to indict a sitting president. If they want to impeach then they need further investigation

Well if we must wait until 2020 we must, but i hope he get impeached before that

 

[Enoch07]

It warrants further investigation then

3 years and $22 million is sufficient enough, of which not enough evidence was found to support a case.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Well if we must wait until 2020 we must, but i hope he get impeached before that

He is impeached, then what?

 

[The Reverend Bob]

3 years and $22 million is sufficient enough, of which not enough evidence was found to support a case.

Yet the Republicans still want to investigate Hillary and her emails.