• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) in the Eyes of Non-Muslims

Gharib

I want Khilafah back
yes we are allowed, the people chose the Helife (that's what an islamic leader is called), unlike you country,
 

Gharib

I want Khilafah back
yeah an election for the prime minister, i know that. what about the queen, the leadership , the big job.
 
yeah an election for the prime minister, i know that. what about the queen, the leadership , the big job.
In England there is a constintutional monarchy, meaning there is a Queen, but she has no legal power. The big job is the Prime Minister. They lead the country with the cabinet, but the big man is the prime minister.
 

Gharib

I want Khilafah back
no i understand the prime minister thing pretty well actually. i know that they are the leader but they are controlled by the queen, her desiccion can override anyother if she wants the prime minister gone then it will happen, she has controll over the country with the prime minister but the prime minister is like a pupet of the queen. is that right?
 

Steinninn

Viking
but the queen gets paid for doing nothing. correct
Yes, but that's not the point.

The point is, are they able to vote for who is in change? Yes.

They vote for the person that will controle the countrie.

The Queen is just a simpol of sorts, and pointing out that they don't vote for her is not a good argument.
 

Gharib

I want Khilafah back
ok i think i should leave it here before i go into too much detail. thanks for making that point Seinninn i understand, i guess we need to wait for England my lionheart to continue with his questions and see where he takes it.
 

kai

ragamuffin
the Queen is a figurehead she gets paid because she is the ambassador for the united Kingdom, People like having her around ,she brings in tourists, and if we didnt want a queen we just have to have enough of us to think so and shes gone. she has no power at all, she does not lead the union.
 

Steinninn

Viking
ok i think i should leave it here before i go into too much detail. thanks for making that point Seinninn i understand, i guess we need to wait for England my lionheart to continue with his questions and see where he takes it.
Well, I still want to know... do you honestly believe that because of the Queen the English don't get to vote for a leader?
 

Gharib

I want Khilafah back
Well, I still want to know... do you honestly believe that because of the Queen the English don't get to vote for a leader?

yes thats what i think. i don't know if you know this but Australia is also controlled by the queen, they decided to break up i think quite some time a go, it was on the news, but they decided not too, she goes to australia collects the money and beats it. she does the same thing in the UK, and if she had no power then how is she allowed to do that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: kai

kai

ragamuffin
yes thats what i think. i don't know if you know this but Australia is also controlled by the queen, they decided to break up i think quite some time a go, it was on the news, but they decided not too, she goes to australia collects the money and beats it. she does the same thing in the UK, and if she had no power then how is she allowed to do that?


ha ha thats really funny eselam i have to frubal you for one of the funniest posts i have seen for a long time, where oh where do you get this from , :D
 

England my lionheart

Rockerjahili Rebel
Premium Member
yes thats what i think. i don't know if you know this but Australia is also controlled by the queen, they decided to break up i think quite some time a go, it was on the news, but they decided not too, she goes to australia collects the money and beats it. she does the same thing in the UK, and if she had no power then how is she allowed to do that?

Where on Earth did you get this info LOL,its so funny
 

Steinninn

Viking
yes thats what i think. i don't know if you know this but Australia is also controlled by the queen, they decided to break up i think quite some time a go, it was on the news, but they decided not too, she goes to australia collects the money and beats it. she does the same thing in the UK, and if she had no power then how is she allowed to do that?
Oh, yea, it's true. And Canada to. She goes to Canada, shows up for a meeting, can't deside anything, can't controle anything. All she does is get her picture taken for the money stamp. Goes back home to England, but not before she collects a hole bunch of money from the taxpayers.

Wachington is also on the US dollar. He's also the kind of image for the US. So Bush isn't rely the head of that country, it has to be George Wachington.

Oh yea, I have another example. Let's take the white house for example. The actual house. It's been there forever and never get's changed (like the queen). You can't vote for a new white house (like the queen). The actual house dosn't have any legal power (like the queen). But you like to have it around, taking pictures of it for postcards (like the queen). So just because the white house is more important than the president doesn't mean they don't have a just voting system.

See how silly this is?

Ok, this is getting into a policital debate. I'll stop right here.
 
Top