McBell
Unbound
Yep.What are you talking about?? I think you have a misunderstanding. There is only 1 Quran.
Just like there is only one Bible....
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yep.What are you talking about?? I think you have a misunderstanding. There is only 1 Quran.
By the way, which Qur'an? are we talking about? There are people in Germany right now translating version of the Koran that was found in Persia (Iran), I'm looking for that point out this material from the National Geographic Society special on the Koran, Video -- Interpreting the Koran -- National Geographic
As the above points out, there seems to be a greater degree of interpretation than the Bible would lend itself to? It is of course a necessity for any person seeking God to ask, How do we know that the Bible is the Word of God, and not the Apocrypha, the Quran, the Book of Mormon, etc.? , and as far as Abrahamic religions go, it would of course be right for Muslims to ask, Do the Quran and Muhammad affirm or reject the Bible? Should a Muslim read the Bible? . We conservative Protestants believe we have the correct book from God, and we follow a consistent hermeneutic What is Biblical Hermeneutics? in, interpreting the Bible. A very formal statement on how it was done was issued some years back, Chicago Statement on Biblical Hermeneutics (1982) We, would be the first to admit those of other ideas about father Abraham may have very different ideas on interpretation of not only the Old and New Testaments, but what is to be considered holy scripture.
No actually not the same at all because as far as I know different versions of Bibles incorporate different stories.Just like there is only one Bible....
The Qur'an has one single form from which translations are produced. Every single copy of the Qur'an is identical.
What exactly does interpretation have to do with the fact that each Qur'an is identical?And yet there is still countless intepretations of it.
Because they are not identical.What exactly does interpretation have to do with the fact that each Qur'an is identical?
There are multiple versions of the Koran in English, for example.
As A-man ESL said the Qur'an is in referenced only to the book in Arabic. Translations are referred to as just that translations, for example one does not need to be in a state of purity to read a translation but does to read the Qur'an in Arabic.Because they are not identical.
Of course I realize, I have read several. They are called translations however, they are not looked upon as different versions of the Qur'an but as different translations of the Qur'an.There are multiple versions of the Koran in English, for example.
One reason that I am impressed is because the narration of the Qur'an is then, assuming you are a Muslim, from Allah to the Angel Gabriel to the Prophet Muhammad to humanity. I prefer my religious texts to be unaltered.Though I do wonder why you are so impressed with something that you used to be able say only because one Muslim warlord picked his favourite version of the Quran then went to great lengths to eradicate all other versions.
And yet you do not know that the warlords favourite version was not altered.I prefer my religious texts to be unaltered.
I like how much arrogance you have so as to subscribe what I do and do not know. Either way you are going to have to prove your statement because I have support of the formulation and transmission of the Qur'an from the Prophet to the people and the opinion of well known Orientalists who agree with my conclusion that the Qur'an is unchanged here.Mestemia said:And yet you do not know that the warlords favourite version was not altered.
I like how much arrogance you have so as to subscribe what I do and do not know. Either way you are going to have to prove your statement because I have support of the formulation and transmission of the Qur'an from the Prophet to the people and the opinion of well known Orientalists who agree with my conclusion that the Qur'an is unchanged here.
And please if you are going to attempt to be inflammatory and disparaging be realistic in your slandering, Uthman was in no sense a "warlord" as his rise to rule and its basis was on the basis of democratic election, nor did its codification begin with Uthamn.
Where is the original Koran?I like how much arrogance you have so as to subscribe what I do and do not know. Either way you are going to have to prove your statement because I have support of the formulation and transmission of the Qur'an from the Prophet to the people and the opinion of well known Orientalists who agree with my conclusion that the Qur'an is unchanged here.
And please if you are going to attempt to be inflammatory and disparaging be realistic in your slandering, Uthman was in no sense a "warlord" as his rise to rule and its basis was on the basis of democratic election, nor did its codification begin with Uthamn.