I agree with you. The literature continually reports on experiments regarding evolution. Not sure how anyone could miss that.Now you are putting words in my mouth.
I only spoke of Evolution only in general term. I didn’t make an claim of Evolution being “gradual” or “sudden”. I have not mentioned anything as to the rate of change.
Please, stop making things up.
All I said, what you quoted from me, is that Evolution do “do” experimental tests. I even gave you a couple of examples of such experiments, like thermoluminescence dating, radiometric dating and DNA test/analysis. All 3 are examples of experiments being performed.
As I said, I wrote nothing about gradual changes or sudden changes, so this is nothing but you, using strawman.
I don't know of any evidence for sudden change in evolution. I suppose it depends on what is meant by sudden. One hundred thousand years could be sudden in terms of evolution. Insubstantial change in a generation could be seen as sudden (a trend towards an increase of a specific mutation in a population), but that would be insufficient to claim speciation. Sudden usually means quickly and without warning. Like a duck suddenly turning into a crocodile. I wonder if that is the sort of "sudden" that is being claimed?
Have you seen anyone define sudden or present evidence for sudden speciation? I haven't.