Not for you, they aren't. But you seem to be weighing the argument on whether or not you "like" it.
"liking it" is just a turn of phrase. More precisely I would say, I don't find those arguments to be logically sound.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Not for you, they aren't. But you seem to be weighing the argument on whether or not you "like" it.
So, your link references a Rueters poll which offers the following ordered list of ...
The world's most dangerous countries for women
- Afghanistan ...
- Congo ...
- Pakistan ...
- India ...
- Somalia ...
Note that the predominantly Christian Congo precedes Pakistan on the list while Pakistan's predominantly Hindu neighbor, India, directly follows Pakistan on the list, and note further that Indonesia and Turkey are not listed.
Do you see any reason to think that Islam is not the predicate for global misogyny? Or is bigotry and white man's burden condescension too strong a lens?
I highly doubt most people with the OP history of argument want Islamic reform. Rather, they want the elimination of Islam. No amount of 'reform' would be satisfactory, because the view holds that Islam CAN'T be liberal or it isn't 'real Islam.' They are only an ally to 'their sisters' so long as they 'switch sides.'
I strongly advise against criticizing moderation.
This risks getting rapped knuckles, poofed posts, & locked threads.
That was part of your initiation process.Not to mention wedgies in the locker-room when all you want to do is go home for the night after a hard day's posting.
Err...or perhaps that was only me.
That was part of your initiation process.
That was protection money.Really? I thought the brown paper bag full of unmarked bills I had to give @4consideration was my initiation?