Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Wow.Well Mestemia is obviously not your real name so you have multiple names, does that mean you have a split personality. Your bluffing because you have no belief in God.
What contradictions?How you do you reconcile the contradictions of being involved in a conversation about God's you have no belief in, are you so weak in your faith that you have to belittle others belief's to feel better about your own??
Knowledge of which god?
There are literally thousands of them you know.
Do you have knowledge of them all or are you having one particular god in mind?
Are you ever going to get back to the question you dodged
I see you are not interested in honest discussion.You have the rather illogical from my perspective, faith that you're right about everything!!
Except you did not state which god....You're obviously not even bothering to read my posts as I answered your question quite clearly in post #175
Ok..I accept that you did not fully understand where I was coming from..I think you missed my point. I don't expect any of that.
You're "just beyond a monkey", too. Any knowledge that's beyond my capabilities is beyond your capabilities as well.
So what do you understand about the Upanishads and the religious practice of Sanatan Dharma that you sign off on it with the outhouse trolling signature..."unsubstantiated rhetoric"..Not acceptable here.
Unsubstantiated rhetoric.
We know enough about the conscious mind, not to be fooled by ancient mythology.
You always go no no no no no
But not once substantiate a single claim.
Provide credible sources.
Note that your above post was a response to my post above...if you are not familiar with Sanatan Dharma and the Upanishads, then you are out of your depth and would be better confining yourself to Everything but the Kitchen Sink Forum. If you insist in making persistent "unsubstantiated rhetoric" claims about posts by people who have studied the scripture of Sanatan Dharma, without your being familiar with it, and without you providing some explicit support for your claim...then you are out of order...So what do you understand about the Upanishads and the religious practice of Sanatan Dharma that you sign off on it with the outhouse trolling signature..."unsubstantiated rhetoric"..
The irony is that you have no clue about what Brahman really is, and your claiming posts by those who have studied it as unsubstantiated rhetoric is itself unsubstantiated rhetoric...
So what do you know about the conscious mind that refutes the idea that the cosmos is one, and is infinite and eternal..?
Brahman is an indivisible one...mortal minds such as yours as it is presently developed, can never be still long enough to understand what non-dualism means
Link is well-meaning, but I feel naive.
Where have I read that response before....Substantiate your claims with credible sources.
Stop dodging the point
What do you mean?You need to follow and understand what you write.
Your always dodging your unsupported claims like to to understand what non-dualism means
What do you mean?