Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You just disqualified yourself from debate since she has. You may disagree with her policies but that does not mean that she has not explained them. Meanwhile my claims about tRump are true.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
New York Times endorses Harris as ‘the only choice’ for president
- Thread starter fantome profane
- Start date
Regiomontanus
Eastern Orthodox
To be fair, Biden does this too. I would like to buy an EV by the Chinese company BYD. Insanely affordable and the quality is supposedly very good. But Biden has a 27.5% tariff on the cars.
That said, if Captain Bone Spurs gets his way, everyone will pay much more for a wide variety of everyday goods.
Last edited:
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Pure projection.
You are speaking of Trump who has had 9 years to come up with a "concept of a plan."
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
And confession. Don't forget that.
Regiomontanus
Eastern Orthodox
I have family in heavily agricultural parts of California. The farmers there rely almost 100% on migrant labor. So yeah, the impact would be HUGE.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Because the people that cross it are stealing and eating american pets?
That’s the purpose of tariffs, to help products made in America competive with cheaper imports. Trump wants to impose tariffs on imports that aren’t made in America. It’ll just add to the price. Stupid.
Outrageous concept, in fact. They're only women, after all -- why the heck should they have any say? It's up to their fathers until they get married, and then their hubby tells them what to do. If hubby dies, then her sons, brothers or brothers-in-law are her decision makers. This is God's will for women!Yeah, so maybe it should be up to the person who's health is being risked, what they want to do with their own body.
Crazy concept, eh?
stvdv
Veteran Member
Finally, now they can't blame Putin for messing with the votes, that would be hypocritical
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
She is the equivalent of pointing out the table of contents , but when you open the book all the pages are blank.
Terrywoodenpic
Oldest Heretic
Hardly....
Most of the whole world would prefer Harris to Trump.
You need to be infected with the Maga virus to see it differently.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
If they are illegal they are getting the boot and good riddance. That's what screwed up the economy in the first place.
Regiomontanus
Eastern Orthodox
Yeah, so maybe it should be up to the person who's health is being risked, what they want to do with their own body.
Crazy concept, eh?
Or...
Maybe the state should stick up for these innocent unborn children? Protect them from murder?
The problem with debating abortion is that the 'pro-choice' side only has an argument if they completely discount the value of the unborn. You and others treat them as disposable tissue, which I find abhorrent.
Yet, we keep speaking past each other....round and round we go.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Yeah, women aren't responsible enough to make their own decisions! Someone else should be making them for us.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
So you haven't thought about it very deeply at all.
Awesome.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
No just the opposite. People hire illegals because of they are far cheaper than hiring citizens living there , so what happens to Citizens wages then when it's much cheaper to get illegal labor? Ever stop to think of that?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Please. You have to do better than that. Here is your problem. You are not reasoning consistently. It is impossible to go into massive detail in one short interview. And if you make this claim about Harris your attack against Trump should be ten times stronger because he does not even have that.
You need to use the same standards for both. You do not get to use impossibly high standards for Harris and no standards at all for Trump an claim that Harris is the one that failed.
Clizby Wampuscat
Well-Known Member
I would want better guidelines for doctors to follow. They should define what health risk means.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
The pro-choice side actually says, it's up to he individual person to decide what's best for themselves, rather than having politicians legislate on what they know nothing about.
I find that the supposed "pro-life" crowd often doesn't give a rat's patootie about the health/life of the woman involved and seems to think they're better equipped to make life decisions for other people than those people are themselves, while giving all the value to a fetus that hasn't been born yet, isn't developed yet, and doesn't have an actual life with social ties, responsibilities, and connections with other born and developed human beings. A woman that just died trying to obtain a life-saving abortion had a husband and a six-year-old child at home. I cannot say that her life is worth less than a fetus. I don't see how it could be.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
They stagnate. But once again you are not looking at the big picture. And remember how you keep complaining about inflation? Your proposal of ending illegal immigrants as sources of labor would be extremely inflationary when it came to fresh produce. You would be paying several times as much for most fresh fruit and vegetables. Our country right now depends heavily on illegal immigrants. Trump has no solution to that. He is lying when he says that he will deport them all since even he is not that stupid. His base on the other hand is extremely gullible and will eat up all of his lies as if they were the word of god themselves.