IsmailaGodHasHeard
Well-Known Member
I agree completely.
Thank you.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I agree completely.
Thank you.
Nazareth was actually a town in the sand dunes of Neptune, presided over by Lord H. P. Dumpty III.
That's why your evidence leads you to believe that Nazareth did not exist. It wasn't on earth!
Booga Booga
The only 'Nazareth' that existed in the 1st century is the one in your head! Say! You would'nt happen to be a card-carrying member of the Flat Earth Society, would you? :biglaugh:
Typical response from those addicted to Sensation.
Next!:sorry1:
I am a Green Knight of the masons of Jericho. I don't carry a card. I carry a phaser of the Star Trek the Next Generation variety.
We guarded the Treat Pea Tolls for 3 long years before they were rediscovered by the Buddha and published in the International Journal of BS.
Snooga Snooga
In all seriousness, it is impressive to me what someone can do with spam and how abstinently they can defend it.
I may have seen worse, but I can't remember when that was.
Kudos
Well, then, please allow me to jog your memory. For excellent examples, take a look at all the fabrications the Catholic archaelologists created to defend the notion of a 1st Century Nazareth.
Here: The truth about Nazareth
Besides, you've incorrectly remembered the "definition:"
No sir
I was generally generalizing with key notes E flat
So then there was the story about the monk who dozed off on a midsummer afternoon up in a tree down the road from the monastery. Suddenly, he came to the overwhelming realization that he knew everything. Excited at his new discovery, he jumps down out of the tree and begins to run back up the road toward the monastery to tell all the other monks. Halfway up the road, he encounters another monk coming toward him. Before the first monk could open his mouth, the second monk says:
'Hey! Aren't you the guy who knows everything?'
More yummy spam.
Later perhaps some whine?
Why, the Bible tells me so, that's how, and ooh pooh pee doo!
*****If the Bible were spam, you'd believe that too.:yes:
Well, it turns out that it actually IS spam, and that is why I do NOT believe it. However, there are certain things about the story of Yeshua that cause me to understand it as being truthful. Some of hose things are mystical in nature, and I have verified them via of my own experiences. There is no other way that anyone can have come up with them other than via of direct experience.
Fortunately it wasn't included in your source.
It was included: the reference was the several mentions of a 'city of Nazareth' in the NT, and that it was not mentioned in the OT. The Talmud was also included as a listing of Galilean towns and villages.
I think that it's just as pathetic and tragic for a person to thoughtlessly "believe" the bible as it is for others to blindly accept obviously deceiptful crap written about it.
There is nothing that I see as being 'obviously deceitful'. What is obviously deceitful is the transformation of Yeshua into the fictional Jesus, complete with his fictional hometown called 'Nazareth'.
All the poof for Naz-beth you can't handle