• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

No Evidence for 1st Century Nazareth

A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
And you know that how?

Your knowledge of 2nd Temple Period Israel is laughable. More interesting is your willingness to denigrate 1st century Jewish and Pagan society as "fringe Hebrew schismists."

I think he means "Christians" or more precisely, the Gospel writers (?).
 

Heathen Hammer

Nope, you're still wrong
And you know that how?
Know what how? Are you promoting the idea that Jesus' followers fact checked him? lol
Your knowledge of 2nd Temple Period Israel is laughable. More interesting is your willingness to denigrate 1st century Jewish and Pagan society as "fringe Hebrew schismists."

I know what the various sites already cited here as possible evidence, say, and that involves this area during that period. The criticisms of your assumptions are sound. Again, how am I denigrating pagan society?? The fringe I am talking of are Jesus' followers at that time. They were a fringe group at that point, get used to it. You are already all over the map of stupid in your kneejerk defense. I guess it's time for an avalanche of strawmen from your side. Have at it, I won't be on long.
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
Minus the ignorant part, as demonstrated by you. :)

The speed and power of your intellect light up RF and the rest of the world with the brightness of the infinite stars.

Break our chains. Lead us out of our gloomy cave and into the life-giving warmth of day.
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
Be still my soul!

We have met Jay's teacher!

At long last love has arrived. Let us hope that he has compassion for us - not only to show us the error of our beliefs in Nazareth - but to perfect us in every way.
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
So the 'theory' is:
  • one or more fringe Hebrew schismists sloppily, foolishly, and unnecessarilly fabicates Nazareth.
  • a group of fringe Hebrew schismists certainly weren't going to go tromping across the desert to simply go check if the place existed.
  • and, fortunately, none of the opponents of these fringe Hebrew schismists knew enough or cared enough to expose this sloppy, foolish, unnecessary fabrication.
I wonder what desert our newfound friend had in mind.
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
Excuse me while I strip down to my undies and run around the library, waving my arms about not as a madman, but as one ecstatic with the pure joy of actualizing the Heathen Hammer.
 

Heathen Hammer

Nope, you're still wrong
So the 'theory' is:
  • one or more fringe Hebrew schismists sloppily, foolishly, and unnecessarilly fabicates Nazareth.
  • a group of fringe Hebrew schismists certainly weren't going to go tromping across the desert to simply go check if the place existed.
  • and, fortunately, none of the opponents of these fringe Hebrew schismists new enough or cared enough to expose this sloppy, foolish, unnecessary fabrication.
I wonder what desert our newfound friend had in mind.

Interesting, how are these assumptions wrong? You assert they are, but offer no real information to the contrary, only scorn. You've probably been here a while, but you're not very good at this, are you?
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
I wonder what desert our newfound friend had in mind.

The desert of the soul.

Be patient with our friend - he is one of the few of us who fulfilled the ancient oracle "know thyself."

I'm afraid that coming out from this journey he's having trouble telling the difference between the inner world and the outer world -- we can call it "fantasy" and "reality."
 

Heathen Hammer

Nope, you're still wrong
What desert? :)

Levant "2. Climate Characteristic of the Levant is the large extent of dry Ecological Zones, both desert and sub-desert, with no - or sparse vegetation. Mountains are also extensive and most forests in the region are confined to mountains, in particular the wetter submontane zones. Steppe vegetation, dominated by grass and shrubs, cover the drier mountain zones." Im sorry, what?
 
Top