man of faith said:
Then we both agree, they were once under ocean water, sorta like a flood.
But those mountains were only under water over 50 MILLION OF YEARS before man ever existed. (actually there were no mountains known as the Himalaya; not until the Indian tectonic plate met with the Eurasian plat, causing the uplifts.)
The Himalaya, including Everest, was never under water 4000-5000 years ago (c. 2340 BCE for the Noah's Flood), if that what's you're getting at?
Not unless you think Noah was there 50+ million years ago. Do you know how ridiculous your claim is, MoF?
And the Himalaya certain didn't rise up after the supposed Noah's Flood 4300 or so years ago.
There are geological evidences to support that weren't much change to the elevations of the Himalaya, including Mt Everest in the past 10,000 years.
You (and the author of that silly article, John Morris) are completely ignoring the age of the marine fossils. If Morris seriously believe that the flood occur 4300 years ago to cover in water the region now known as the Himalaya, then I'd doubt seriously his PhD credential...which I do.
I can't believe that you would provide such garbage of an article, MoF.