Sonofason
Well-Known Member
No evidence that what you say is trueLanguage is learned through assimilation. Sexual orientation is at least partially genetic. The two are not synonymous.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No evidence that what you say is trueLanguage is learned through assimilation. Sexual orientation is at least partially genetic. The two are not synonymous.
You're a good cherry picker. But really, you're right...in a debate forum, I couldn't care any less about your personal opinions. How about sharing facts, or maybe some evidence?Given the above statements, I am rather curious what you are doing on a debate forum.
Really??? I thought you believed that God wrote the Bible. Who would have thunk?That is ridiculous, just because a man had concubines does in no way suggest that God condoned it.
Really? Well these scientists don't agree with you. And btw,..I could have posted hundreds of studies...serious studies proving you wrong.No evidence that what you say is true
I believe I just did regarding the genetic basis for homosexuality. I have yet to see much in the way of evidence to the contrary from you however.You're a good cherry picker. But really, you're right...in a debate forum, I couldn't care any less about your personal opinions. How about sharing facts, or maybe some evidence?
I can't wait. The ooey gooeyer the better!ROFL...Dessert it is my dear. I hope you like all sorts of gooey and decadent things for dessert. And trust me when I say you are lucky not to live here where the one of the most likely candidates for president is a Trumped-up (pun not intended) ******* with a seriously bad toupe.
Amen to that sugar. He scares me. And too many are just laughing his progress off, not seeing that he has the potential to really be our next (shudder) president.I can't wait. The ooey gooeyer the better!
Trump is truly a nightmare. He's great when you need a good laugh but as a serious candidate, the guy is seriously off his rocker.
If the election were tomorrow, it's quite possible that he could be the next president and that is a very, very scary thought. But as usual, I think things will work themselves out as the election approaches and saner (though not completely sane) heads might prevail. Let's hope so. I'm not American but just the idea of this egomaniac being the leader of a country is frickin' terrifying.Amen to that sugar. He scares me. And too many are just laughing his progress off, not seeing that he has the potential to really be our next (shudder) president.
ALL the evidence points to those things being true.No evidence that what you say is true
She's not batsh** crazy though. That's what makes the Donald truly scary to me.I find it disturbing that so many are either scared of Hillary or scared of Trump.
Sure, sure...Trump looks like a bull in a china shop.
But Hillary is a hawk with a secretive authoritarian streak.
I cast a wary eye at both.
Neither is crazy.She's not batsh** crazy though. That's what makes the Donald truly scary to me.
She's a known quantity, one which I find having opposed me in too manyHilary just does nothing for me. She never has. I want to like her, but I can't. And I'm not even really sure why. Maybe it has to do with what you say here.
The evidence lies in just about any 100-level sociology, psychology, and anthropology textbook.No evidence that what you say is true
He says and does truly outrageous and crazy things. I don't think it's an overreaction to question his sanity or his integrity. I don't think an egomaniac who can barely control himself should be running a country.Neither is crazy.
Trump just doesn't adopt the persona of the artful politician.
So the opposition enjoys over-reacting
I think they're both weird, just in different ways. Hillary strikes me as a phony, which I guess supports what you're saying.She's a known quantity, one which I find having opposed me in too many
places....hawkish, anti-gay marriage, big government, secretive, authoritarian.
But Trump has no history for me to compare with his rhetoric.
So I don't support him, & I more actively don't support her.
If "insanity" is to be so broadly used, then everyone who voted for Obama is insane.He says and does truly outrageous and crazy things. I don't think it's an overreaction to question his sanity or his integrity.
No argument on this point.I don't think an egomaniac who can barely control himself should be running a country.
Phoniness is an undesirable trait, but that is the least of her flaws from my voting perspective.I think they're both weird, just in different ways. Hillary strikes me as a phony, which I guess supports what you're saying.
You really think I'm using it so broadly has to basically have no meaning?If "insanity" is to be so broadly used, then everyone who voted for Obama is insane.
For McCain too.
No argument on this point.
I guess it's pretty typical of (American) politicians.Phoniness is an undesirable trait, but that is the least of her flaws from my voting perspective.
Exactly.You really think I'm using it so broadly has to basically have no meaning?
No.You've heard Trump speak, right?
And Hillary is different?He says outrageous things that have no basis in reality, then refuses to take responsibility for making things up.
Agreed.That can be very dangerous.
If you want to make a case for insanity, it would require some evidence.Especially when you're tweeting things like whites killed by blacks account for 81% of crimes in the US. Or that Mexicans are basically all rapists and murderers.
I guess it's pretty typical of (American) politicians.
I use it when people demonstrate that they are detached from reality.Exactly.
It has come to mean...."There's someone I disagree with, or I find'm repulsive."
Maybe that's why you don't get what I'm talking about?No.
I never listen to politicans' speaking.
Most people are different.And Hillary is different?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-inaccurate-tweet_56524c0de4b0879a5b0b6c10Agreed.
But I see grave danger from most of the candidates.
If you want to make a case for insanity, it would require some evidence.
Paraphrasing doesn't do it for me.
Is it really detachment from reality....or is it that they perceive it differently?I use it when people demonstrate that they are detached from reality.
I get it to an extent.Maybe that's why you don't get what I'm talking about?
So many statements.....Most people are different.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-inaccurate-tweet_56524c0de4b0879a5b0b6c10
"I am being proven right about massive vaccinations — the doctors lied. Save our children and their future." — Twitter, 2014
http://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2015/1...ks-reporter-with-disability-berman-sot-ac.cnn
"I have people that have been studying [Obama's birth certificate] and they cannot believe what they're finding... I would like to have him show his birth certificate, and can I be honest with you, I hope he can. Because if he can't, if he can't, if he wasn't born in this country, which is a real possibility…then he has pulled one of the great cons in the history of politics."
http://www.ew.com/article/2015/06/29/donald-trump-most-offensive-comments
"You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes.
Blood coming out of her wherever." –Donald Trump, insulting Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly over questions she asked during the first Republican primary debate
"He’s not a war hero. He’s a war hero because he was captured. I like people that weren’t captured.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/trump-attacks-mccain-i-like-people-who-werent-captured-120317
“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ents-connecting-mexican-immigrants-and-crime/
These are stupid people that say, `Oh didn’t Trump declare bankruptcy? Didn’t he go bankrupt?’ I didn’t go bankrupt.”
http://www.inc.com/john-brandon/20-outrageous-donald-trump-quotes-on-business.html
The Bible contains 66 books written by 40 different authors. It seems your presumptions about what I believe are incorrect. But that is not surprising to me.Really??? I thought you believed that God wrote the Bible. Who would have thunk?